Jump to content
 

Dave F's photos - ongoing - more added each day


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

Some photos from the Keighley and Worth Valley this afternoon.  They were taken between 1968 and 1970 when there were some interesting liveries.

 

 

 

attachicon.gifm Mytholmes tunnel 41241 Oxenhope to Keighley July 68 J1369.jpg

Mytholmes tunnel 41241 Oxenhope to Keighley July 68 J1369

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth ex L&Y 957 painted for Railway Children Film Sept 70 J2340.jpg

Haworth ex L&Y 957 painted for Railway Children Film Sept 70 J2340

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth No 63 Oxenhope to Keighley Sept 69 C119.jpg

Haworth No 63 Oxenhope to Keighley Sept 69 C119

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth Royal Scot 46115 Scots Guardsman July 68 J1351.jpg

Haworth Royal Scot 46115 Scots Guardsman July 68 J1351

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth W&M railbuses M79964 and 79962 July 68 J1362.jpg

Haworth W&M railbuses M79964 and 79962 July 68 J1362

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth yard with railbuses Sept 70 C351.jpg

Haworth yard with railbuses Sept 70 C351

 

 

David

 

That's a strange coincidence - I'm watching 'The Railway Children' (1970) on ITV3 at the moment! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. Great to see the photo's of the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway - bright liveries excepted. The Midland line photo's are terrific and show a good variety of traction including a begrimed 8F 48126 in photo' J07. Good to see the semaphore signalling at Pye Bridge as well, including a bracket signal with three distants on it.

 

All the best,

 

Market65.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that in the early days the preserved railways saw a need to be clearly different from BR - after all they were using locos and stock which had been in normal use on BR until only a year or two earlier.

 

I'm also not sure if BR required some sort of livery change as a condition of sale in those days.  Perhaps someone else may know.

 

David

David

 

As a purist I have always disliked these fake liveries that the conservation railways used at the time. So, I was interested to read either on this, or another, website recently that BR required that (working) locomotives (and possibly other stock) could not be in BR liveries. This meant there was a problem when it came to the newer locos - such as Ivatts, Standards and the Diesels. I've no idea when this request was rescinded.

 

Paul Bartlett

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Wasn't that one of the various demands of Alan Pegler in 1963?

 

As well as having to resign from the BRB if he dared purchase 60103, he would not be allowed to run it on BR if it remained in its current livery?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Some photos from the Keighley and Worth Valley this afternoon.  They were taken between 1968 and 1970 when there were some interesting liveries.

 

 

 

attachicon.gifm Mytholmes tunnel 41241 Oxenhope to Keighley July 68 J1369.jpg

Mytholmes tunnel 41241 Oxenhope to Keighley July 68 J1369

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth ex L&Y 957 painted for Railway Children Film Sept 70 J2340.jpg

Haworth ex L&Y 957 painted for Railway Children Film Sept 70 J2340

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth No 63 Oxenhope to Keighley Sept 69 C119.jpg

Haworth No 63 Oxenhope to Keighley Sept 69 C119

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth Royal Scot 46115 Scots Guardsman July 68 J1351.jpg

Haworth Royal Scot 46115 Scots Guardsman July 68 J1351

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth W&M railbuses M79964 and 79962 July 68 J1362.jpg

Haworth W&M railbuses M79964 and 79962 July 68 J1362

 

 

attachicon.gifs Haworth yard with railbuses Sept 70 C351.jpg

Haworth yard with railbuses Sept 70 C351

 

 

David

Nice Triumph Vitesse

 

Kevin

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

David

 

As a purist I have always disliked these fake liveries that the conservation railways used at the time. So, I was interested to read either on this, or another, website recently that BR required that (working) locomotives (and possibly other stock) could not be in BR liveries. This meant there was a problem when it came to the newer locos - such as Ivatts, Standards and the Diesels. I've no idea when this request was rescinded.

 

Paul Bartlett

I'm not sure when this rule was recinded, as I'm sure the Q6 ran on the NYMR in BR black around 1970,although when they got the class 24 in 1976 it had to have the double arrows removed and for some reason the 24 part of the number.

I wouldn't have minded some of the fictional liveries such as LMS on a 2mt tank,but red and CR blue on the lakeside 2.6.4 tank...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure when this rule was recinded, as I'm sure the Q6 ran on the NYMR in BR black around 1970,although when they got the class 24 in 1976 it had to have the double arrows removed and for some reason the 24 part of the number.

I wouldn't have minded some of the fictional liveries such as LMS on a 2mt tank,but red and CR blue on the lakeside 2.6.4 tank...

You're right. Through-out summer of 1969 the Q6 was re-painted into BR Black at Thornaby. It was re-liveried into NER black on the NYMR in August 1970. I've wondered whether the NCB imposed a similar restriction with the "NYMR" legend quickly replacing "NCB" on Lambton No.5 or it was in this case, just a matter of new management imposing their own identity?

 

I certainly agree about the fictional liveries. I've never been a fan, but fully understood the financial reasoning behind wall papering a Black Five or having a loco painted in Hogwarts livery.

 

P

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I'm not sure when this rule was recinded, as I'm sure the Q6 ran on the NYMR in BR black around 1970,although when they got the class 24 in 1976 it had to have the double arrows removed and for some reason the 24 part of the number.

I wouldn't have minded some of the fictional liveries such as LMS on a 2mt tank,but red and CR blue on the lakeside 2.6.4 tank...

But wasn't part of the reason on the 24 that the loco had been sold for scrap and resale wasn't allowed?

 

Andy G

Link to post
Share on other sites

But wasn't part of the reason on the 24 that the loco had been sold for scrap and resale wasn't allowed?

It was the same with the Q6. BR wavered the rule to allow the Q6 to be bought from Bolckows, and there is of course, the now well known tale of how 63395 never reached Bolckows at Blyth due to large amounts of Brown Ale being administered to the rostered crew.

P

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. I really like the photo's of Grantham. They certainly show how much things had changed at Grantham from the years that the famous layout is based on - the '30's -  and the '70's of your photo's. I especially like that last photo', C1691, of a class 55 on the 27th, July, 1974.  A very classy view.

 

All the best,

 

Market65.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. Like the photo's of Carlisle. In the first two there can be seen two engines begrimed in brake dust. Then in photo' C9104, of 37014, on an empty oil train from Dalston on September 1st, 1987, you have got the 37 looking most imposing. In the final photo' it is clearly a very wet day!

 

All the best,

 

Market65.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I never thought I'd actually get nostalgic about 'blue diesel days', but I am! I even enjoyed watching a Deltic singing through 36E this morning (however, it was ttGreen). They don't whistle or roar and I though throb was a bit vulgar!

Great shots Dave. Carlisle was still a place to try to visit in the early 80s.

Phil 

Edited by Mallard60022
Link to post
Share on other sites

C9111 is a nostalgic photo, as 26026 is the only loco that I have driven - although it was at Thornton Junction at the time and there was a strike on, so nothing was moving.

 

I only went to the foreman's office in order to ask what the number was, as the loco was parked behind the depot wall. And yet he asked an older driver if he would escort me around and as part of the tour he took me into the cab of 26026, started it up and then drove it up the yard, stopped and said would I like a go.

 

:O :o :O Would I like a go??? :O :o :O :o

 

Is the Pope Catholic??

 

So there I was, shunting the 26 along the track - an event never to be forgotten.

 

Thankyou to everyone at Thornton Junction.

 

 

100852.jpg

Great stuff, wish i was around back then for the chance of things like that (was only born in sept 87)!

keep the pics and snippets of info coming, one of the best topics and still going!

cheers

james

Edited by jessy1692
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Hi, Dave. What  a great selection of photo's of Sowerby Bridge. In C149, in October, 1969, in spite of the fog, it is possible to make out that the class 101 DMU has a class 110 TSL. The fog makes things quite eerie and ethereal back in 1969.

 

All the best,

 

Market65.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

C9111 is a nostalgic photo, as 26026 is the only loco that I have driven - although it was at Thornton Junction at the time and there was a strike on, so nothing was moving.

 

I only went to the foreman's office in order to ask what the number was, as the loco was parked behind the depot wall. And yet he asked an older driver if he would escort me around and as part of the tour he took me into the cab of 26026, started it up and then drove it up the yard, stopped and said would I like a go.

 

:O :o :O Would I like a go??? :O :o :O :o

 

Is the Pope Catholic??

 

So there I was, shunting the 26 along the track - an event never to be forgotten.  

 

Thankyou to everyone at Thornton Junction.

 

 

attachicon.gif100852.jpg

 

Early - mid 80s, similar thing happened to myself. Fortress Toton was the target, we were on a tour of the east mids area and my mates dad said if you dont ask you dont get so off he went with two young teenagers in tow, the foreman couldnt have been much nicer, spare driver collared to give us a tour. After wandering round the shed and yard, we happened to ask if we could 'cab' the 56 we were next to (56060). Once in the cab, driver started it up which was ace but then delivered the ultimate question, "who wants to drive first?"

 

You could have floored us with a feather, (as above, are bears catholic, does the pope defecate in the woods etc etc), my mate ended up driving out towards the exit signal and I drove her back towards the shed, a memory that will stay with me forever! 

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent stuff, Banger Blue. I am glad that I was not the only one who was treated to such excitement by depot staff. It did make such a difference to the surly and downright rude attitude shown by some employees who knew exactly why we were there and had probably tried to do the same in steam days when they were young.

 

I know this ought to be obvious, but what struck me about driving a diesel loco was how smooth the movement was from a standing start, as power was applied to the traction motors. All I had ever known was a car or van and those are quite jerky accelerations with gear changes.

 

As you say, a memory never to be forgotten.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...