Jump to content
 

Gilbert

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    5,696
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Gilbert

  1. 1 hour ago, stewartingram said:

    Am I correct in thinking that the GE version is one of the discontinued/withdrawn items?

    257 is the GE version

    LNER G5 Class 0-4-4T No. 67322 BR Lined Black Early Emblem with Westinghouse pump and 2-rail cage back bunker
    [Great Eastern area loco]

    • Thanks 1
  2. 10 minutes ago, MrWolf said:

    I wouldn't worry about the type of coupling you choose, so long as it suits your purposes. There are some and we have all met them, who can drone on for hours about how you have chosen the wrong coupling.....

    Thanks - I find Kadees go down very well with most of the crowd at shows....playing trains...will it catch on?

    • Like 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  3. Just now, Jonnyb said:

    If you don’t mind me asking, what did you use for ballast on this layout and is there a build thread for it?

    I'm adding to this thread as I go.

    Ballast is Woodland scenics buff and light gray plus Green scenes grey. Over spray of Precision weathered sleepers and rails picked out with rust.

    • Informative/Useful 2
  4. Just now, MrWolf said:

    Nice model, I have always had a soft spot for the J70. Don't worry about the Tri-ang style couplings, they come right off. At least it doesn't have a face on it! ;)

    Since the foto they have had sound fitted as well as Kadees which I know don't suit everyone but allow for a bit of delayed action shunting fun.....just need to fire up the airbrush for a  bit of weathering....

    • Like 2
    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  5. 45 minutes ago, NHY 581 said:

     

     

    Thanks Wooders,  

     

    I am really enjoying starting this particular project. I think, yes, my style will fit well with the prototype. ( Though I'm not sure I have a style as such) I think part of the challenge is adapting yourself to the prototype you are trying to create. 

     

    I see this layout as minimalist. Few buildings, low in height and well spaced to hopefully achieve an open look to it all. 

     

    I will be staying with Standard Sheep Operating Procedure ( S.S.O.P ) and using RTP buildings. 

     

    Hornby R9777 Weighbridge is on its way. R9777-PO01_20201014_3621307_Qty1_1.jpg.fab69cff5c578aa28041469f82d53cd3.jpg

     

    I will also collect a second weighbridge, again Hornby, R 8588. R8588-U_3157986_Qty1_1.jpg.bdf957f9eff2b6ebda338a59fb120911.jpg

    R8588-U_3157986_Qty1_3.jpg.4b9f4299d8ba83787e028e0bf06cf5b4.jpg

     

    These clearly are not W&U buildings but they give a hint if you squint. 

     

    ( The plate thing will be consigned to somewhere) 

     

    Both buildings will be tweaked  detailed and weathered. 

     

    Onward. 

     

    Rob. 

     

    I think #1 is pretty close...

    • Agree 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, MrWolf said:

    For some reason, I am thinking of a road in open fens, tramway down one verge, a road junction on the opposite side guarded by a disused pillbox. Telephone poles down the other verge and very little else. 

    Oh yes the pill box.....I resisted on Lockdown Fen but it would look good...small stretches of unnecessary brick wall also add to the overall picture.

    • Friendly/supportive 1
×
×
  • Create New...