Jump to content
 

MarcD

Members
  • Posts

    2,751
  • Joined

Everything posted by MarcD

  1. Yes it is. I have three micro layouts under development one in P4, one in S7(33mm) and one in S7(I)(36.75mm). The S7 one is up first. It is a bear baseboard at the moment with some of the rail down. It has to be ready for mid October. So no pressure there then. Marc
  2. The Furness and the Cambrian wagons were exactly the same size at 1ft6 high(from the floor), LNWR were 1ft10, as was the GWR. Marc
  3. Most of the cambrian's wagon stock was 2 planks both fixed side and drop side and they were used to move slate. The Furness two planks has an extrodany long life in traffic but ths was only because they were the only wagons that could be loaded at the slate wharf at Kirkby. The last ones only being sold out of service, to BHSC, in the late 1950's when the slate wharf whent out of use. Is the key to two plank wagon Roofing Slate? LNWR used them in North Wales, as did the Cambrian and the GWR. Furness used them at Kirkby and Coniston and the Cally at Ballachulish. The only place I can't think that extracted slate and had a mainline railway conection but didn't use two plank wagons was Delabole Slate Quarry in Cornwall which was connected to the LSWR who used 1 plank with 12 in sides or 3plk drop side wagons. Marc
  4. A bit of progress with this after a few years off. 3 prototypes built. Class D 2 plank open built circ 1870 painted as 1900 piped only. Class D 3 plank drop-side built circ 1890 painted 1900 piped only (8ft6 WB) Class D 3 plank centre door (9ft WB) built circ 1895 fully fitted with round hand wheel. The 3 planks are available in 8ft6 and 9ft WB with a range of brakes and buffers. Also should have a shale wagon and a 2 plank ballast wagon on the stand at GuildEx in September. The bodies can be produced in HO, 4mm S and G1 if anyone wants them in these scales. Marc
  5. Not sure what was going on with the one I saw but it didn't sound like that. There were a few of us and none of us though it was quite right. It might just need synchronization. I had a chip in a terrier that had the same problem until it popped. Marc
  6. Having listened to one go round the Carlisle test track this afternoon I'm not convinced the sound is that great. It sounded more like a 3 cylinder compound than a 2 cylinder shunter. It looked good even though this one was in in BR black. I think I might be tempted to get a DC one and fit my own chip. Marc
  7. Could the last batch of 299's with the extra vertical strapping be the same as the WD wagons? I don't suppose there is a photo of the 299's in WD livery? Marc
  8. Just goes to show that you can't have enough LNWR Dia 1 wagons. Marc
  9. It has all the characteristics of a Caledonian cattle van. I used to do one in 7mm. The giveaway would be the axle boxes but you can't see them. Marc
  10. There is a similar LNWR case. There is a drawing for a 4 plank open on a steel underframe. The LNWR were experimenting with steel underframes on wagons around the date of the drawing and all wooden wagons with identical dimensions were bing built at the same time but there is no evidence that any 4 plank wagons were built with steel underframes, not even one for a test. Having said that the late Prof Mick Aston all ways used to say absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. If you can't prove people were there you can't prove that they weren't. Marx
  11. I think Its less about the wheel base and more to do with the over hang. if he had turned the loco round then don't think he would have the same problem. I have the same problem running my terrier's bunker first through set track points. I might have to get one to run on WC Boggs. It would go well with the LSWR terrier. Marc
  12. The 2 plank got a coat of paint this morning And to go with it 2 GNR(I) opens. A 4 plank And a 6 plank. They should all be getting their wheels, buffers and brakes added tomorrow. Marc
  13. I didn't think it was operational. Last saw it in the museum near stoke.
  14. Wagon wheels then. That will keep the cost down. Is that the same are the one that ran on the Ratty?
  15. What size wheels does it have?
  16. A bit fishy if you ask me. If I was about to bring a new product to market I would be showing off any prototype I had. Marc
  17. I have just printed the first body of a DNGR diagram 1 2 plank open. It's a first for my as it's first venture into Irish railways. I have a few more designs in the pipeline. I have some 5ft3 rocking underframes on the way so they will be running on 36.75 track. Marc
  18. The trick with rubdown transfers is to use scotch magic tape to hold down the transfer while you rub it down. It's sticky enough to hold everything down without ripping off the paint. I did a short video on how to apply different types of transfers on my YouTube channel. Marc
  19. I've used the Powsides transfers in 7mm. I use the 4mm ones for the 3 planks as the 7mm are to big. I have also used Fox transfers for my tram locos. Marc
  20. These were manly used as general merchandise wagons rather than minerals. Coal on the LYR was mainly moved in PO wagons. I have all the LYR wagon books so if you can get a side view I can give you what where and when for the dia. Marc
  21. From 1890 to 1917 the stock would probably a mix of steel and wooden underframe wagons and vans with the majority being of GER origin. From 1917 onwards then numbers of wagons and vans from other companies would increase. I have photos of NER F4 vent vans being loaded at Wisbech pre WW1. I'm currently building a micro layout based on the W&UT. So I'm all over the books at the moment. Marc
  22. Ouch! I stopped using aerosols for that reason. I bought myself a decent airbrush and a compressor. I've also to a greater extent stopped using enamels as they are a pain in the bum to clean up. Marc
  23. As soon as I have finished the baseboard I will post some pictures of the progress. Marc
×
×
  • Create New...