Jump to content
 

MJI

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    5,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MJI

  1. I need a lot more Mark 1s but availablity is not great at the moment, so considering Comet ones.

     

    As to Mark 2/2a, there is an accurate model you could fit the Bachmann windows and bogies to, scrapping the shells.

     

    Triang Hornby, they are spot on with major dimensions, just the glazing, and poor bogies on later ones, they do scrub up well.

     

    This is why I asked for one to be put next to a Accurascale 2B, to show how accurate the new model is.

     

    You get the feeling the toolmakers got to play with a real Mark 2.

    • Like 2
  2. I want a longer* mineral wagon train, so started the usual bid on Airfix 16T with low bids, did not get any. 4 are 10ft, 4 or 5 are 8 shoe.

     

    Anyway will be maximum of 34, aiming for 15 or so. So of course checked thingiverse, printing out 2 at a go, now using ABSlike resin, no topflap conversion, no VB conversion, BUT no suitable for 9ft, so will be attempting my first resin axlebox swap, just need some split ones.

     

    Also at the annoying stage of needing a minimum of 6 of a particular loco class, 4 of another, and a lot more of a third.

     

    Getting to stage of not another 47.

     

    * got a 6 modeled so far of 9 MCV MXV MDV mixed rake

    • Like 2
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  3. 9 hours ago, The Johnster said:

    I feel much the same about Midland 0-6-0s and inside cylinder 4-4-0s...

     

    If you want to find out the differences between GW loco, try accurately modelling one with the allegedly standard parts from another class, and see how easy it is to cope with different cylinder and boiler centre-line heights.  I expect it's the same with the Midland 0-6-0s and 4-4-0s!

    Just different sizes, as to 4 4 0 they are all similar.

     

    Same as most GWR panniers.

     

    More variety with prairies.

  4. 22 minutes ago, Michael Hodgson said:

    Silly boy question, but these cranes look as though they can only unload long rails on one side of the wagon as the upright would obstruct the load if wanted on the opposite side.   I can't believe they would design a train so that it has to go to the nearest triangle for turning.  What am I missing?

     

    Sorry I don't know, I was working off spotting information, then found a picture.

  5. 10 hours ago, Scottish Modeller said:

    Hi Martin,

     

    I've only seen Sturgeon with cranes in preservation.

     

    Embsay and Bolton Abbey Railway  have (had) one.

     

    Are you sure it was a sturgeon with cranes?

     

    I can think of Elk and Salmon with cranes.

     

    Phil H

    Yes, some had cranes. Either fit cranes or break off all end bits.

     

    The instructions are not exactly good.

     

    Crane ones fit with my plans.

  6. If you want it make it,  i don't have the time to wait. Been waiting 40 years for cross country DMUs so made my own.

     

    I also have a short wishlist in with ironmink. Who was already considering the wagons.

     

    If any are done chassisless, would be my request due to different axleboxes .

×
×
  • Create New...