Jump to content
 

Limpley Stoker

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    2,013
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Limpley Stoker

  1. Further to Graham's comment's Mike's Pull & Push bible will show you that there were three similar Driving Trailers built on second-hand frames but : -

    1) two used former 'Ironclad chassis so had truss-rod underfames on very different bogies and were a foot shorter ....

    2) had fully-panelled driving / brake compartments ....

    3) had a totally different arrangement of passenger compartments ............... a MAJOR cut 'n' shut job would be required to produce these from a Hornby oroginal !

    Thank you for that - major surgery is not on my agenda, but perhaps somebody might fill that niche with a RTR model of a driving trailer- based on any of the pregrouping panelled stock.

     

    Mike

    • Like 1
  2. Some of the loose coaches were latervPull Push fitted and ending up in number of Pull Push sets as replacement coaches as trailer cars rather then driving cars.I believe there were two diagram 31 and six diagram 97s so converted.

    Thank you for that information, I will shelve my plans for ruining a perfectly good model !

     

    Mike

  3. It would be worth looking at An Illustrated History of Southern Pull-Push Stock by Mike King to see if any of the Hornby brakes can be converted to a driving car. In the absence of any Southern pull-push sets that predate the Maunsell pull-push sets it would be worth having a go and I would be interested to see the outcome. British Railways did remove the lavatories when they converted the Maunsell coaches into pull-push sets.

    The 8 compartment brake 3rd could be converted then, having no lavatories - I will have to get the book which hopefully has some illustrations and drawings.

  4. Great model, all the details are there: 3 domes, lots of squared corners and an outsize cab. I think the BR version in lined malachite is the best looking.

    Perhaps I should have a rethink on the USA Tanks ... Hmmm, powerful, functional, utilitarian ... but still ugly. A Q1 looks positively pretty in comparison.

    It's Southern-ish, but I'll happily cope without one.

    I don't know whether you'd weather one........

  5. Cheers Phil. 

    We've got all the castles on the list, including Leeds, plus Canterbury Cathedral.  Also planning on the RHD and maybe the KESR. We will be using the trains too, where we can.

    Hadn't heard about the Atom Bomb factory, will seek more info. Walking and bird watching..... depends on the boss.

     

    As for sleepy Cornwall... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-37016913

    If you are visiting the South coast you could also squeeze in a visit to Rye, especially if you are an E.S. Benson fan. Lovely cobbled streets, small fishing harbour and the ancient Mermaid Inn for lunch.

  6. Correct. And very good it was too. I did not consume any sausages, as that would have been rude, but we did enjoy the view before and after the meal.

     

    From where I was sat, I could just see the mouth of Parsons Tunnel, very distant across the bay, but you could only see trains along that part of the Sea Wall when the sun had come round and was shining on the rear cab.

     

    Here's the view across the bay from a location just a bit further up the road from the tea rooms:

    attachicon.gif20160808_170750.jpg

     

    I sneaked a few shots of the cliff railway as well, which I'd not seen before:

    attachicon.gif20160808_171730.jpg

     

    attachicon.gif20160808_171809.jpg

     

    attachicon.gif20160808_171838.jpg

     

    attachicon.gif20160808_171843.jpg

    That takes me back to the mid- fifties : Platform 1, Paddington, the Torbay Express to my auntie's in Torquay, packed lunches on endless cliff walks, usually in drizzle, and up and down that cliff railway- I haven't seen it since. The journeys there and back were the best bits, though!

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...