Manitoba

It was a request to prevent imminent dispatch of an order to an unattended address. So it did require a timely acknowledgement from A/S. Initial contact sent Tuesday morning, follow-up sent this morning. This afternoon as I posted, I received a request to give feedback on how my chat had been handled (before any response had been received). Hence the choice of RMWeb as the nuclear option, knowing that it would resolve the issue (which thanks to A/S's usual alertness it has), albeit stirring up the expected hornet's nest in the process. I have attempted to change the title of the thread..... Phil

Thanks Fran, All sorted. Sorry to have do this publicly but RMWeb does work... Phil

Roy, Thanks for your feedback. You may not be aware that: 1) If you sent A/S and e-mail it goes to the web chat anyway, and 2) On 24 August McC of A/S posted "Our teams response time for the month of august is under five minutes with mean resolution times at 16 minutes so we’re never too busy to help! " Phil

Contacted Accurascale Customer Support via e-mail yesterday morning. After over 24 hours I have yet to receive a response (apart from the initial automated acknowledgement). There seems to be no other means of contact apart from Instagram and Facebook - neither of which I use. I have tried SMS, but it just tags onto the original mail. I post here out of some frustration....... Phil

Me too - not sure they're even in the country yet..... Phil

From occasional eye-balling of the online signalling sites over the last couple of days there does appear to be a marked reluctance for up trains to use the dive-under. Network rail needs to get this sorted, or the DfT won't be very impressed that they're not using their new £200 million bit of train set.

Are we certain about this? The CAD shows the top/rear part of the bunker as a separate piece, just as on the 16xx (unless I am mis-reading it). Phil

Thanks for posting this. How does it look from the side? Phil

I firmly agree with the last point. I had been planning to buy the 16xx, but the rear of the bunker looks too much like a botch, and I will be hanging on to my drinking vouchers. Let's hope it's not too late to save the day for the 15xx Phil

Was Wattle and Daub not considered?

CV settings for the sound-fitted version: CV9 = 50 CV56 = 255 CV57 = 65 CV58 = 20

Interesting. I sent one back with a similar fault earlier in the week. Let's hope it's not a design / QC problem for the model.

Wondering how the principle of limiting discounts squares with the legal points in the attached link. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/529969/RPM_60SS.pdf Phil

Just checked out the Parkside section of the new site. What a mess! O and OO offerings jumbled up, with no clue as to which is which apart from price level and product code (if you happen to know their system by heart). Phil