Jump to content
 

modfather

Members
  • Posts

    718
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by modfather

  1. Was it ever confirmed that there actually was an OLE defect ? The ADD I am familiar with consists of an air supply passed under the pantograph carbons, arranged so that if the carbons are dislodged or damaged, whether due to an OLE fault or a pan defect, the pan will lower. The procedure should then be to stop and examine the pan for any damage. Surely there would be an indication on the 800s of which pan had the ADD activation, or did both ? Regardless, an ADD activation should not have affected the ability to run in diesel mode, although if the pan was damaged and had become foul to gauge or the OLE the train would be stuck.

    The add also has an over height dump valve on the 800 leading to a choked exhaust that lets the pan sharply drop away from the wire then damps the travel to rest.

  2. So nothing to do with all the variation orders then?

    It sounds as if they were a bit skimpy on the initial build!

    The first batch was built before the test trains had started in the UK. up to #8 from memory, plus the mod work which included all sorts from interior labels to reworked control panels such as the one to the left of the driver which isn't as factory...

  3. designs change it happens apologies to all for leading up a blind alley

     

    Nick

    Not complaining, just saving the next person the time spent trying.

     

    Question 2 - are the jinty conversion roads designed to be used single thickness or laminated?

     

    Kind regards, cautious of Auckland.

  4. If it's retro-fitted.

     

    Retro-fitting anything is a nightmare!

     

    A truly sensible path is to fit it to a new fleet, then cut overonly once all the unfitted trains are gone. Which isn't an easy thing to do on a railway with a stack of different routes and/or fleets operating over it, and freight locos will always be a problem, because they travel far and wide.

    Which is why the 80x fleet currently has the most expensive speedo in the uk

  5. Ian Rice often advocates the idea, with an american operating style. I think in the light railways book he mapped the brill branch out, which seemed like a great idea, if a little challenging for the rolling stock!

  6. Maybe just tired of 180s ! Bi modes would have a taken care of the non electric Hull but an all singing dancing unit does allow away from the OLE , standing for Old Lectric Equipment.... But really putting bus engines under trains is that really a way forward ... he says after 16 years experience of 220s at work !!

     

    Robert

    Definitely not a bus engine. The engine has its distant roots in a railcar application. It's already used in a selection of power rafts for units on the continent and has absolutely nothing to do with a bus. At least, that's what I learnt at the MTU factory, on behalf of HRE.

×
×
  • Create New...