Layout plan has been Templotted and using 12' heel switches I've managed to get it into just under 5' long, I was hoping to get it inside 4'8 1/2" for the scalefour challeneg but its pushing it a little bit, it needs a bit extra to actually make the loop useful I think. I dont seem to be able to get the 2 short sidings at the front like Iain plan, but may be thats a good thing, we'll see.
The plain track part of the loop can hold 6-7 clay hoods and 10'liner wagons. I can get 3 VAA length wagons, and 4-5 tanks in there. The loop headshunt will hold a cl50, which is the longest of the planned stock with Westerns and Peaks coming in just shorter than the Hoover. If I stand stock over the turnout to the right which routes to off scene top right, run round and then push the rake in to the head shunt I can add several more wagons to the rake. I think thats an exceptable amount of stock, what do others think? Would such a run round and then push in to head shunt seem silly or is there any basis for it in reality?
The slurry loading point will still be on the front siding and can hold 4 TTA sized tank
Scenic wise I was thinking of either creating something similar to the Combe station bridge, but putting track through both sides, or going a long the lines of mirror imaging the bridge in to Carbis wharf.
Combe station: http://www.flickr.com/photos/actonwellsjunction/5997879543/in/faves-14819322@N06/
Carbis: http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?app=core&module=attach§ion=attach&attach_rel_module=post&attach_id=339162
Anyway this is what it looks like so far
I've begun looking in to drys and which one to use as a prototype, I do like the older styles such as Iain Robinson's, Wheal Elizabeth and Trerices, probably becuase they're smaller and fit that small style layout.
Out of curiosity when was bagged clay first collected in closed wagons?
Thanks for reading
Dave