Without this getting too drawn out and dull, I think you are missing the point I was trying to make as regards the rundown of a fleet of locomotives well before their best before date.
That is where the farce lies. If you don't think its farcical, that is your opinion and are welcome to it.
This is not a dig at EWS/DB and I am not anti- them one bit, however it does seem mad to withdraw locos with a good few years left in them!
Of course I am looking at it from an enthusiasts point of view. I am not a railwayman, however I do have family members who are, and my friends are all drivers, and they too share the view that they have been sidelined way too early.
Obviously money is the key factor here (or general lack of it at the moment) as I imagine that if the world wasn't in the financial squeeze that we are in, then there would be the industry, the freight borne from that and the locos would still be running.
Of course people at DB know how much it costs to run their trains! If they didn't there would be a problem wouldn't there?!
As you say it does seem to work with a small handful of 60's to handle things to 3000 tonnes single handedly, which is good for us as enthusiasts.
I feel your question aimed at me personally asking whether I had carried out a monetary review of the cost of maintaining/running/rebuilding 60's opposed to the use of 66's was pointless and a bit daft, but there we go, you say tomato etc.
I think we should leave it there!!!