Jump to content
 

richbrummitt

Members
  • Posts

    2,762
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by richbrummitt

  1. 10 hours ago, WillCav said:

    Excellent advice.  I am researching the O11/O15 and V12/14/16 types at the moment as there seems to be some uncertainty as to where the V hanger should go (central / slightly offset / more offset) on somw types and Atkins is not that helpful in this instance.

    I have too many DC1 braked vehicles thanks to Cooper craft's instructions too!

    Thanks

    Will

     

    For the Minks: V12 offset V hanger, central on V14/16. I haven't actually finished any Opens so unable to help on those. I found this out after I finished bending a PECO body and NGS ends into a V12 so have the same issues as you and @Enterprisingwestern have found yourselves in. Since I'd already done the painting and lettering I hid behind a parapet. 

    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  2. There's sometimes a mix for all sorts of reasons. The two applying to you also apply more generally.  Having through hole components gives a more robust fixation to the board for anything that is touched or shaken. An SMD is only attached to the pad(s) on one side and they can delaminate. A through hole should have solder all the way through the hole onto the pads on both sides. 

    • Like 1
  3. 56 minutes ago, kitpw said:

    "GWR Freight Wagons & Loads In Service On The Great Western Railway And British Rail, Western Region" has a picture (Fig 11) dated to 1910 of a 4 plank open (No 54156) with a caption "...a different system of loading sawn timber into open wagons" - although the "sawn timber" looks to be riven, not sawn, and may be protecting another sort of load behind  a "hedge" of timbers standing upright in the wagon.  Nevertheless, JH Russell suggests that sawn timber was carried in GWR 4 plank opens in 1910 and I dare say it was already established practice. 

     

    I've made a model of that wagon and will always wonder if it is atypical. 

     

    SmartSelect_20200227-220222_Chrome.jpg.73d5b34c38a7310374516c39554a0c98.jpg

     

    I assumed the surrounding timber was increasing capacity for more timber. 

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  4. My memories of going to the Pontefract show years ago (with someone else's layout) are largely to do with how good the hospitality was, especially the exhibitors lunches. Good to hear you were well looked and after.

     

    Congratulations on the silverware.

    • Like 1
  5. I used to walk the path adjacent to Basingstoke regularly as our first home (the wife and I) was just off the top edge of your crop of the nls sourced map on the RHS of the top edge and when we bought our first house it was only a few minutes walk to the north.

     

    The 'pop up' car parks, as at Basingstoke, were installed in the last couple of years to increase capacity at a number of stations between here and London Waterloo (and probably a number of other places also?).

    • Like 2
  6. If you had a passenger train between 8 and 6 then it is unlikely a freight would precede it and therefore your first scenario seems void in real world situation. To shunt freight out in front would be improbable. More likely a head shunt (siding in the opposite direction at the entrance to a fan of sidings) for the sidings created by 2 through 4 would be provided with a LH? connection creating a line parallel to the track 6 to 11.

     

    Sidings in the bottom right could work well and add interest in the opposite direction main running line.

    • Informative/Useful 1
  7. 2 hours ago, Kylestrome said:

     

    I am sold on the big stuff but I need more space!

    Best of luck getting sound into a 2mm Class 08 ... ;)

     

    David

     

    I think the way to do it is probably a sound decoder in the layout consisted to a locomotive. Might not work convincingly for anything other than small to medium layouts but to fit a larger decoder and speaker in our little engines is asking too much. 

    • Like 2
  8. Van would be the term for a full brake. I.e. capacity to carry things but not passengers. 

     

    I believe that the GWR were particular with their language regarding brake third and van third. It is clear they made the effort to distinguish.

     

    I therefore suggest that your trains in the post would - in correct GWR parlance - be:

     

    *Stands up for shooting*

     

    Van Third, Third, Composite, Van

    Brake Third, Composite, Van Third

    Brake Third, Composite, Third, Van Third

     

    although I haven't looked in Williams' books for a long time to check his terminology.

     

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...