Jump to content
 

The non-railway and non-modelling social zone. Please ensure forum rules are adhered to in this area too!

Driving standards


hayfield
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Pete the Elaner said:

 

Having looked at the location on a map, I am concerned how someone could have lost control with enough speed to go through a fence & kill somebody.

 

Just what I was thinking

 

Our local chippy was destroyed in a similar incident, admittedly an elderly driver but you do start to wonder what happened.

 

About 25% of RTA's dont involve another road user which says all you need to know

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
29 minutes ago, Pete the Elaner said:

 

Having looked at the location on a map, I am concerned how someone could have lost control with enough speed to go through a fence & kill somebody.


driving a wholly inappropriate 2.5 ton 250bhp vehicle in an urban environment probably didn’t help, any real need for such a big powerful car in the city other than for vanity

 

it does however say the driver had a medical emergency, if they passed out and blipped the throttle then a car that big and powerful that can do 0-60 in 6 seconds is no better than a missile, a wooden fence isn’t going to stop it, the building looks like it did however, unfortunately at the cost of a young life 

 

looking at the BBC link I find the whole, live update thing distasteful, especially the photos of the vehicle taken from the air, a child died there, do we really need to see multiple angles of the car, and the whole timeline thing… ‘parents are arriving to collect their children’……‘An ambulance has left’ it’s really of no real interest to anyone outside of those effected at the scene surely 

  • Agree 13
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
6 minutes ago, big jim said:


driving a wholly inappropriate 2.5 ton 250bhp vehicle in an urban environment probably didn’t help, any real need for such a big powerful car in the city other than for vanity

 

it does however say the driver had a medical emergency, if they passed out and blipped the throttle then a car that big and powerful that can do 0-60 in 6 seconds is no better than a missile, a wooden fence isn’t going to stop it, the building looks like it did however, unfortunately at the cost of a young life 

 

looking at the BBC link I find the whole, live update thing distasteful, especially the photos of the vehicle taken from the air, a child died there, do we really need to see multiple angles of the car, and the whole timeline thing… ‘parents are arriving to collect their children’……‘An ambulance has left’ it’s really of no real interest to anyone outside of those effected at the scene surely 

But that is the fundamental problem with news video clips. Because they are on the spot, they think they have to tell you every minute detail, rather than what is actually relevant. Watching a reporter, standing in front of a police tape, tells you SFA of importance.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 minutes ago, johnofwessex said:

What I might hope although I doubt if it will happen is that with the switch to EV's we ask some serious questions about the sort of vehicles we allow on our roads and their maximum permitted speeds

Not going to happen. Some would be EV owners, since the operating costs are potentially (sorry) lower, will take the view that as such a vehicle will cost less to run, they may as well spend the savings on a bigger/more powerful vehicle!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, kevinlms said:

Not going to happen. Some would be EV owners, since the operating costs are potentially (sorry) lower, will take the view that as such a vehicle will cost less to run, they may as well spend the savings on a bigger/more powerful vehicle!

 

Groan..........

 

By definition the sort of person who wants that sort of vehicle is the very last person who should have it 

  • Agree 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, big jim said:


driving a wholly inappropriate 2.5 ton 250bhp vehicle in an urban environment probably didn’t help, any real need for such a big powerful car in the city other than for vanity

 

it does however say the driver had a medical emergency, if they passed out and blipped the throttle then a car that big and powerful that can do 0-60 in 6 seconds is no better than a missile, a wooden fence isn’t going to stop it, the building looks like it did however, unfortunately at the cost of a young life

 

Given it's a new Land Rover costing over £60k I thought it would have come with autonomous braking which ought to catch this kind of thing.

Any vehicle that can take off like a rocket should you twitch your right foot should have some safeguards in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I went back to tech college (remember them?) in Cambridge, Clive Sinclair had his office close by. Now, regardless of what many people think of him, he was a very clever guy, and the college did have close connections with him. It was said by my tutor, when Clive was interested in developing an electric car, the biggest problem he had found, was slowing down the rate of accleration.

Of course, this was in the era when the big oil industry and car industry (combined) were totally opposed to switching to electric cars. What did Clive end up with? The C5, powered by a washing machine motor, and really a potential danger on the roads - though I do find them fascinating.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

If this Chelsie tractor thats caused this is a diesel or petrol vehicle it will have anti stall,so if your foot is not on the brake and its in drive or a gear it will keep going until the brake or clutch pedal are pressed.........most EV have to be driven down hill,if you back off throttle the regeneration system slows the vehicle.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
5 hours ago, johnofwessex said:

What I might hope although I doubt if it will happen is that with the switch to EV's we ask some serious questions about the sort of vehicles we allow on our roads and their maximum permitted speeds


Then there is the road wear angle: https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/electriccars/article-12237529/Britains-pothole-crisis-worse-electric-cars.html

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PhilJ W said:

What a load of clap-trap, EV's cause no more damage than their petrol and diesel equivalents. 

 

Quote

Electric cars, which are roughly twice as heavy as standard models

 

Gotta love a carefully researched article...

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, stewartingram said:

When I went back to tech college (remember them?) in Cambridge, Clive Sinclair had his office close by. Now, regardless of what many people think of him, he was a very clever guy, and the college did have close connections with him. It was said by my tutor, when Clive was interested in developing an electric car, the biggest problem he had found, was slowing down the rate of accleration.

Of course, this was in the era when the big oil industry and car industry (combined) were totally opposed to switching to electric cars. What did Clive end up with? The C5, powered by a washing machine motor, and really a potential danger on the roads - though I do find them fascinating.

My wife and I were nearly run down on a local seafront pedestrian promenade last year, by a bunch of Hooray Henrys and Henriettas in C5s. It turns out there is a C5 "specialist" locally who also hires them out, presumably to any daft pr*ck.

  • Funny 2
  • Friendly/supportive 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolute classic yesterday. Had to come to a halt when exiting a roundabout yesterday. Why? I hear you ask...

 

A bit of heavy traffic at the top as I think there'd been an accident. Such as it is you just accept your fate and join the queue of traffic. Not sure Lord/Lady ballbag wanted to though, as they decided to reverse back down the slip road, reverse onto the roundabout and drive another way. I'd normally just let it pass but they'd actually prevented myself and the car behind from exiting the roundabout and caused a delay.

 

I have dashcam footage that I'm sure Cambs Constabulary will be happy to view (I have indeed reported it).

  • Like 2
  • Round of applause 2
  • Friendly/supportive 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
5 hours ago, PhilJ W said:

Not now due to tough anti-discrimination laws.

It's supposed to be tough and Uber claim they block drivers from their app, at the 2nd offence. So clearly the message isn't getting through.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
7 hours ago, kevinlms said:

It's supposed to be tough and Uber claim they block drivers from their app, at the 2nd offence. So clearly the message isn't getting through.

Was that in Australia? Here in the UK the rules are a lot tougher.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 24/04/2023 at 10:03, Nick C said:

Driving back from SWAG yesterday, I got caught up in the inevitable traffic jam passing Stonehenge, which as is often the case, had backed up across the Longbarrow roundabout (https://goo.gl/maps/9bxEJMJkbVbvjgdy7) - in fact the traffic shown in the aerial photo there pretty much matched what it was like, although it back up a bit further yesterday. The reason for posting in this thread though, was the number of drivers who were desperately trying to push their way further forward in the queue getting across the roundabout - blocking the 'keep clear' where the A360 joins, and trying to push further instead of merging in turn at the merge - why? At most it got them two or three places further in the queue, and several of them I subsequently overtook on the dual carriageway after Amesbury (including a Lamorghini SUV thing that crawled past the speed camera at 55 (the limit being 70) then roared past everyone a mile later...)

 

Bloody Neanderthals - Just because they invented the wheel they think they own the road !!!!

 

Brit15

 

  • Funny 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, PhilJ W said:

Was that in Australia? Here in the UK the rules are a lot tougher.

Yes, it is in Australia. The link was for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, more or less equivalent to BBC.

 

It is 100% illegal for taxis/Uber etc to refuse guide dogs, but these idiots do so anyway. Also businesses, such as restaurants. Every so often, one of the latter get caught out publically and have to do the big public apology and promise staff 'retraining', but drivers seem to endlessly, not understand the law.

  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
21 hours ago, johnofwessex said:

 

My personal view is that 'fail to stop' should be dealt with in the same way as gun/knife crime.

Treating it like that hasn't gone down well in France.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...