RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 Two points here. The flippant one first - Rochester's mock epitaph on Charles II: "Here lies our sovereign Lord the King, whose word no man relied on He never said a foolish thing and never did a wise one." To which the King is said to have responded: "Too true, for my words are my own but my actions my ministers'." Secondly, Edward II's opponents were no doubt familiar with St Augustine's teaching that the efficacy of the sacrament does not depend on the worthiness of the minister. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
webbcompound Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) re the mediaeval nature of things I think the peasants are beginning to revolt. When my father was learning Russian for the military one of the teachers was a White Russian emigree who had married a Mr Worthington. The unfeeling junior subalterns were wont to sing (to the tune of don't put your daughter on the stage..) "Throw another peasant on the fire Mrs Worthington" She was most indignant and protested that she had always treated her peasants properly. I fear we are in the state we are now because we have indeed been throwing some of our peasants on the fire. Edited September 24, 2019 by webbcompound 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium nick_bastable Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 Given today's events will CA parish by laws be further codified ? Nick 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
webbcompound Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 I think the parish council is a purely advisory body. It is after all the Edwardian era in Castle Aching Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Northroader Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 Just so long as present incumbents don’t end up the same way as poor old Edward 11. Did your lecturer want to go into that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 36 minutes ago, Compound2632 said: Secondly, Edward II's opponents were no doubt familiar with St Augustine's teaching that the efficacy of the sacrament does not depend on the worthiness of the minister. Very good point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 7 minutes ago, Northroader said: Just so long as present incumbents don’t end up the same way as poor old Edward 11. Did your lecturer want to go into that? Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "poker face" 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Sweepstake on tomorrow’s Daily Mail front page headline anyone? 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium nick_bastable Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 35 minutes ago, webbcompound said: I think the parish council is a purely advisory body. It is after all the Edwardian era in Castle Aching But the Edwardian's where true gentlemen and a loaded revolver sat in many desk draws Nick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeysarefun Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 4 hours ago, brack said: You mean I dug a ditch in my garden for nothing? Down here theres no need for a ditch when you've got the Pacific handy... https://www.smh.com.au/national/that-summer-when-prime-minister-harold-holt-vanished-at-sea-20131214-2ze92.html 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroth Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, nick_bastable said: But the Edwardian's where true gentlemen and a loaded revolver sat in many desk draws Nick Just had a look through the Army&Navy store catalogue for 1907. You could get various marks of Webley revolvers , likewise Smith&Wesson revolvers, Colt revolvers, Colt Browning automatic pistols, Webley&Scott automatic pistols and Mauser automatic pistols, at prices to suit all pockets, as it were. If you were really annoyed, you could get as many as you wanted of "The New Short Lee-Enfield Service Rifle" at £6/10/- Govt quality or £5 Ordinary. Suitable ammunition (per 100) .303 solid 15/3, hollow point 15/9, split bullet £1, "Jeffry" split bullet £1. I must say that the hollow point and split bullet varieties sound unethical.... 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroth Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nearholmer said: Sweepstake on tomorrow’s Daily Mail front page headline anyone? It could be a close race to the bottom between the Mail and the Express. Here you go! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-49820055 Edited September 24, 2019 by Hroth 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 29 minutes ago, Hroth said: Just had a look through the Army&Navy store catalogue for 1907. You could get various marks of Webley revolvers , likewise Smith&Wesson revolvers, Colt revolvers, Colt Browning automatic pistols, Webley&Scott automatic pistols and Mauser automatic pistols, at prices to suit all pockets, as it were. If you were really annoyed, you could get as many as you wanted of "The New Short Lee-Enfield Service Rifle" at £6/10/- Govt quality or £5 Ordinary. Suitable ammunition (per 100) .303 solid 15/3, hollow point 15/9, split bullet £1, "Jeffry" split bullet £1. I must say that the hollow point and split bullet varieties sound unethical.... Hollow point was the British developed expanding bullet of 1897. Colloquially called the Dum Dum bullet, after the British-Indian arsenal that had first developed expanding bullets (though using a different method). The British used them with great effect at Omdurman in 1898. The Germans complained about them and they were banned for use in warfare by the Hague Convention of 1899. The Americans dissented and went on to use them in the Phillippines. They could still be legitimately used for hunting, however. Unethical? Well, that's a nice point in this case. The development of full metal jackets for Enfield rifle bullets was found to create smaller wounds than the soft lead bullets of the rifle previously in service, the Martini Henry. This was a problem, because it meant that the Enfields had less stopping power. Now, if you are a British infantryman of the day, your likely opponents come on very quickly, in the 'Fousands' and are often whipped up to a frenzy by drugs (e.g. Zulus) or religious fanaticism (e.g. Mahdists) and what you really need in you ammo pouches is something that will literally stop them in their tracks should you hit them. Guaranteed. Every time. That's what I'd want and I rued the day that we gave up the SLR (self-loading rifle) with its 7.62 round in favour of the SA80 with its 5.56. I always felt that someone put down with an SLR, be he dead or alive, wasn't getting up again. That, I'd imagine, is a good feeling when the other chap is trying to kill you. The soft lead bullets of the Martinis would do this, because they expanded on impact and did a lot of damage. The Enfield round caused less damage, so you could not be so sure that you had incapacitated enough of your enemy before they were, literally, on top of you. All of which goes to remind us what an absolutely horrific business warfare is. However, the Dum Dum was not an attempt to make it more horrific, but to keep the effect of new bullets the same as that of old ones. In other words, to avoid the unintended consequence of a better weapon, one otherwise more efficient at killing the opponent. 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium nick_bastable Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 41 minutes ago, Hroth said: Just had a look through the Army&Navy store catalogue for 1907. You could get various marks of Webley revolvers , likewise Smith&Wesson revolvers, Colt revolvers, Colt Browning automatic pistols, Webley&Scott automatic pistols and Mauser automatic pistols, at prices to suit all pockets, as it were. If you were really annoyed, you could get as many as you wanted of "The New Short Lee-Enfield Service Rifle" at £6/10/- Govt quality or £5 Ordinary. Suitable ammunition (per 100) .303 solid 15/3, hollow point 15/9, split bullet £1, "Jeffry" split bullet £1. I must say that the hollow point and split bullet varieties sound unethical.... I assume the later two are Dum Dum ? Nick 41 minutes ago, Hroth said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) When did it cease to be possible to buy an arsenal from the A&N by mail order? I have in mind that people went to an awful lot of trouble to procure similar things for irregular use in Ireland not long after 1907, so before then, presumably. I also have in mind that when I bought a raincoat in the A&N about fifteen years ago, the place didn't look as if it stocked weaponry, in fact it looked like very run-down shop indeed. Edited September 24, 2019 by Nearholmer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium St Enodoc Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, monkeysarefun said: Down here theres no need for a ditch when you've got the Pacific handy... https://www.smh.com.au/national/that-summer-when-prime-minister-harold-holt-vanished-at-sea-20131214-2ze92.html Is the back beach at Portsea on the Pacific or the Southern? Either way, it's an ocean - if he'd swum away at Bondi, for example, it would definitely have been the Ditch/Dtch (previous correspondence refers). 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buhar Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 That outline of bullet options put me in mind of my thinking when I seriously considered joining the army when I was in my mid-teens. Tank corps, no thanks, too big a target and you're in a box. Artillery, no, the enemy know where you are, next to that big gun. Infantry, yes. The chance to run away if confronted by death. Fortunately, the defence of the realm was enhanced by me taking an alternative career path. Alan 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Nearholmer said: When did it cease to be possible to buy an arsenal from the A&N by mail order? I have in mind that people went to an awful lot of trouble to procure similar things for irregular use in Ireland not long after, so before then, presumably. I also have in mind that when I bought a raincoat in the A&N about fifteen years ago, the place didn't look as if it stocked weaponry, in fact it looked like very run-down shop indeed. As Sir Roger Casement discovered, running guns to one illegal paramilitary organisation was a capital offence whilst running guns to a different illegal paramilitary organisation was something cabinet ministers could do with impunity. Fortunately we're not there yet by a long chalk. Edited September 24, 2019 by Compound2632 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Sir Roger was exactly who I was thinking of. Before my MiL moved over to England, she lived not far from Banna Strand, which, setting aside its place in history, is a quite amazing place, with big sand dunes that go on for miles and miles and miles, and is usually as near deserted as makes no difference. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brack Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 (edited) Gun runners you say, I think I can get us perilously close to on topic in one move? Edited September 24, 2019 by brack 3 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 23 minutes ago, brack said: Gun runners you say, I think I can get us perilously close to on topic in one move? That sort of thing never ends well ... 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroth Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 1 hour ago, Nearholmer said: When did it cease to be possible to buy an arsenal from the A&N by mail order? I have in mind that people went to an awful lot of trouble to procure similar things for irregular use in Ireland not long after 1907, so before then, presumably. I also have in mind that when I bought a raincoat in the A&N about fifteen years ago, the place didn't look as if it stocked weaponry, in fact it looked like very run-down shop indeed. I haven't got it to hand, but I have (somewhere) a late 30s A&N catalogue* which I think still offered a range of firearms to suit all purposes. The true Army & Navy stores were in effect set up to supply the Officer class in the UK and across the Empire. The range of goods that you could procure was amazing, the weaponry is a mere few pages, its just amazing that it was available! I must also add that the Lee-Enfields bear the caveat that purchasers must be British Citizens... In "Secret Water" by Arthur Ransome, its mentioned that Captain Walker ordered supplies from the A&N for the childrens adventure. I suppose that after the Empire and both the Army and Navy dwindled post WW2 that their customer base evaporated and they more or less went out of business. The "Army and Navy" stores that I remember in the 70s onwards mainly sold camping gear and army surplus clothing and were, as you noted, very run down. I've a German gas-mask case obtained from such an A&N store that I used for many years as a camera bag. I've still got it, containing a Zorki 4K 35mm rangefinder (a vague Russian copy of a Leica) with lenses and filters. * Btw, these catalogues are not "originals" but reprints published by David and Charles some years ago. 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hroth Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 19 minutes ago, Edwardian said: That sort of thing never ends well ... The Ghost Train? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm 0-6-0 Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 9 hours ago, Regularity said: Why is that relevant? Too often on RMWeb and indeed other forums, we have speculation and assertion without any form of evidence or reason. OI!!! You lot haven't been speculating again have you? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Annie Posted September 24, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted September 24, 2019 Fortunately here in New Zealand all we have to worry about are rebellious sheep. 3 8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now