RMweb Premium jamie92208 Posted December 11, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 11, 2020 Just to add to my post above this was the inspiration for my comment above. Construction methods 110 years apart. Hopefully we'll have some similar shots of 21st century methods soon. This was in 1910. I've resisted putting up the pictures of the steam navvy and the horse drawn MSC wagons. Jamie 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Northmoor Posted December 11, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 11, 2020 27 minutes ago, jamie92208 said: According to some, that's how HS2 should look when finished as a 25mph line speed is apparently "quite sufficient". 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ess1uk Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 13 hours ago, APOLLO said: Sweden ---- Brit15 They were regraded in the summer by their teachers to BCCB 6 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 5 hours ago, jamie92208 said: .....Construction methods 110 years apart.... ....Hopefully we'll have some similar shots of 21st century methods soon...... The modern day equivalent are the haul roads that have been and are being constructed, to allow access for heavy equipment and the movement of the vast amounts of earth and spoil. . 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium TheQ Posted December 11, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 11, 2020 6 hours ago, jamie92208 said: Just to add to my post above this was the inspiration for my comment above. Construction methods 110 years apart. Hopefully we'll have some similar shots of 21st century methods soon. This was in 1910. I've resisted putting up the pictures of the steam navvy and the horse drawn MSC wagons. Jamie Steam Navvy that's a bit modern isn't it.. PS my great Uncle is in there somewhere.. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zomboid Posted December 11, 2020 Share Posted December 11, 2020 That looks like a cutting that's going to need lots of expensive remedial work over the following centuries... 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 HS2 have put up a diagram to illustrate the bore size of the Chilterns tunnels. . 5 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Northmoor Posted December 14, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, Ron Ron Ron said: HS2 have put up a diagram to illustrate the bore size of the Chilterns tunnels. . This makes sense since the trains are going to be going rather faster than through any of the other tunnels; the air's got to go somewhere. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin_m Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Northmoor said: This makes sense since the trains are going to be going rather faster than through any of the other tunnels; the air's got to go somewhere. Comparing the HS2 diameter with that of the Channel Tunnel, which carries much taller road vehicle shuttles, confirms that the aerodynamics are more important than the train size. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium melmerby Posted December 14, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 14, 2020 46 minutes ago, Edwin_m said: Comparing the HS2 diameter with that of the Channel Tunnel, which carries much taller road vehicle shuttles, confirms that the aerodynamics are more important than the train size. The japanese decided to keep the tunnel size on the Shinkansen as small as practical and concentrate on vehicle aerodynamics, that's how the elongated "duck bill" fronts on the later trains come about. Without them there is a considerable shockwave in front of the train that noisily exits the tunnels as the train emerges. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zomboid Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 That decision also necessitates the small windows that Shinkansen trains are fitted with, I believe, and of ultimately a factor in the relatively short service life of the trains. 1 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Controller Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 10 hours ago, Edwin_m said: Comparing the HS2 diameter with that of the Channel Tunnel, which carries much taller road vehicle shuttles, confirms that the aerodynamics are more important than the train size. Don't forget that the Channel Tunnel has Piston Relief Ducts, at approximately 250m intervals, between the Running Tunnels. When these are closed, maximum speed is limited to 100 kph for all traffic. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
david.hill64 Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 4 hours ago, Zomboid said: That decision also necessitates the small windows that Shinkansen trains are fitted with, I believe, and of ultimately a factor in the relatively short service life of the trains. The trains are sealed with a constant pressure inside the car which means that the bodyshells expand and contract as the pressure outside changes (as it does in a tunnel transit). The smaller windows are better able to withstand the flexing and are less likely to pop out. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zomboid Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 Now you mention it, I would have expected my ears to pop like crazy on the Sanyo & Kyushu Shinkansen, but I don't remember that happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium corneliuslundie Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 But the amount of spoil to be removed is half as much again as for the Channel Tunnel. That comes at a cost. Presumably the calculations have been done. Jonathan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium melmerby Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 Oh Dear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-55303978 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium jamie92208 Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 24 minutes ago, melmerby said: Oh Dear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-55303978 Not good, what's the point of having two disconnected networks, HS2 and NPR. Jamie 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Northmoor Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 31 minutes ago, corneliuslundie said: But the amount of spoil to be removed is half as much again as for the Channel Tunnel. That comes at a cost. Presumably the calculations have been done. Jonathan You don't seriously think they haven't do you? The design team will know to within a few hundred cubic metres how much spoil will be generated from tunneling, how much is required for constructing embankments, where any excess/deficit will be disposed of or obtained from and the cost of transporting it. That's how construction projects work and partly why projects like HS2 cost so much before anyone has even picked up a shovel, because of all the prep work done first rather than met with surprise halfway through. 5 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_mcfarlane Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, melmerby said: Oh Dear: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-55303978 As one of Lilian Greenwood's constituents, you'd be forgiven for thinking that she hibernates between elections, occasionally waking to have a carefully worded pop at the Government in the media before disappearing for another couple of months. Edited December 15, 2020 by pete_mcfarlane 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium corneliuslundie Posted December 15, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 15, 2020 I wasn't meaning that aspect, but the pros and cons of a larger bore tunnel long term in terms of the initial cost versus the long term benefits.. And yes, I sincerely hope they have done the sums too. But having seen the dithering by politicians that goes on for decades with some of these projects, one begins to wonder (see the above post, for example). Jonathan 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Ron Ron Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 (edited) More tunnelling machine sections being delivered. This time to the Long Itchington tunnel in Warwickshire. https://www.facebook.com/groups/404004009667284/permalink/3639916162742703/ . Edited December 15, 2020 by Ron Ron Ron 4 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satan's Goldfish Posted December 18, 2020 Share Posted December 18, 2020 There's a lot of pages to wade through, but did this explanation for the requirement of HS2 over other options make it on to the thread? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete the Elaner Posted December 18, 2020 Share Posted December 18, 2020 4 minutes ago, Satan's Goldfish said: There's a lot of pages to wade through, but did this explanation for the requirement of HS2 over other options make it on to the thread? I've definitely seen it before & am sure there is a link to it somewhere on here. The problem is the anti-HS2 lobby won't watch it or accept any of the arguments. Gareth puts forward a lot of information but I feel he comes across as being overly biased towards it which makes his arguments easier to dismiss as non-factual. I try to imagine what it was like in the 1950s before the motorways were built & feel that in 60 years time, we will accept HS2, HS3 etc in the same way. 2 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium melmerby Posted December 18, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 18, 2020 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Pete the Elaner said: The problem is the anti-HS2 lobby won't watch it or accept any of the arguments. Because they know that unlike all the planners, engineers, et al that do this thing for a living, they are right. Edited December 18, 2020 by melmerby 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium jamie92208 Posted December 18, 2020 RMweb Premium Share Posted December 18, 2020 27 minutes ago, Pete the Elaner said: I've definitely seen it before & am sure there is a link to it somewhere on here. The problem is the anti-HS2 lobby won't watch it or accept any of the arguments. Gareth puts forward a lot of information but I feel he comes across as being overly biased towards it which makes his arguments easier to dismiss as non-factual. I try to imagine what it was like in the 1950s before the motorways were built & feel that in 60 years time, we will accept HS2, HS3 etc in the same way. In the late 50's I lived at Giggleswick on the A65 which is the main road between the West Riding conurbation and the then thriving resort of Morecambe. Every Bank Holiday weekend there used to be traffic jams several miles long caused by the then narrow bridge at Settle. These all disappeared when the M6, 62 and 61 opened. Jamie 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now