Jump to content
 

Anycubic Vyper 3D FDM Printer


Recommended Posts

I have recently purchased a new Anycubic Vyper FDM printer:

IMG_6689.JPG.8628c50a74b888110d9329b9542f9a8c.JPG

 

Why you may ask when I already have 2 Anycubic DLP printers?

 

DLP (Digital Light Processing) printers use a technology that exposes uv sensitive resin (in my case) layer by layer building up a 3D object over time. The majority of resins are extremely brittle (as Tony Wright discovered on my V2 bodies) but can be mixed with more flexible (and last time I looked) and more expensive resins. The finished prints have to be cleaned in Methylated Spirits or IPA and generally smell unpleasant. The resins are toxic and gloves need to be worn. Care must be taken when washing prints so that resin does not go down the sink. Putting a machine to bed on finishing can be a messy business and takes time.

 

So to answer the question why, I found using the resin printer too much hassle.

 

An FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) printer on the other hand prints by laying down "cables" of molten filament a bit like a clay coil pot.

 

I had managed to pick up two reels of SUNLU PLA (Polylactic Acid) Silk filament in a fetching shade of pale green from a charity shop so was able to start playing when the machine arrived. Assembly was very straightforward and I was soon able to print off the supplied test print of an owl:

IMG_6151.JPG.ae9e463b010faab72ddb959bbef64823.JPG

 

The owl is quite a coarse print so layer lines are very evident. I decided I really should do a proper job of it and calibrate the printer. The first and most important is to check and configure the e-steps.

 

FDM printers feed filament through a heated nozzle at a specific rate. If the software requires 100mm of filament to be fed through the nozzle but the printer only physically feeds 95mm then the filament will be under extruded. Likewise feeding too much filament results in over extrusion. My machine as supplied was under extruding so I had to reconfigure the machine to correct it. In order to measure and configure the e-steps setting you need to connect the printer via the supplied usb cable to a computer and use a control program to remotely control the machine. There are many articles and videos on how to do this so I will not go into any further details.

 

With the e-steps correctly configured I then printed a calibration cude to check the dimensional accuracy of the printer:

IMG_6180.JPG.9d17c90e656a3f7ff1b9e943c2d05114.JPG

 

I then downloaded and printed a temperature tower from thingiverse to test the effect of different nozzle temperature on the PLA (Polyactic Acid) filament I was using:

IMG_6182.JPG.ba640387ba1c98ff99c63641b1d3dd53.JPG

 

This determined the best temperature for the Anycubic PLA to be 190 degrees.

 

I then decided to print a benchy (well one has to really):

IMG_6184.JPG.4fed492bacb0dda2217eb85987863438.JPG

 

The last test which I have only printed today is to test various overhangs to determine at what point overhangs need support:

IMG_6692.JPG.3276a88c1a2c5cf41a17f67825678c91.JPG

 

IMG_6693.JPG.f869bafd2aeac6cf3b3d203359e0ad6e.JPG

 

Unfortunately I rescaled the downloaded overhang test so the lettering is unreadable.

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I should also point out that the Vyper comes with an arm to support the filament roll however I decided to buy a roller carrier to stand the filament on as seen in the first photo above.

 

The now followed a period of playing, mainly printing bits for my Grandsons.

 

A T Rex tooth:

IMG_6191.JPG.00bf1ba810b2a9da43f348aeb29312d5.JPG

 

Velociraptor claws:

IMG_6193.JPG.4efd1733a21cb473e77a7a04a4797692.JPG

 

T Rex skull:

IMG_6195.JPG.7c4b393d509a6f05ca2488c9feff928a.JPG

 

I also printed some filler strips to cover the grooves in the printer bed to stop bits falling into them:

IMG_6691.JPG.87c563556cfc2c31a56b4a5e0b54238b.JPG

 

Finally, and just for the hell of it I had a go at printing a GNR 6 wheeler. OK, needs work (a lot):

IMG_6155.JPG.e569ebc588f6542e852839fff883c663.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to get serious.

 

On Thingiverse I found someone had posted a model of a Sentinal Railcar and set to printing it:

IMG_6626.JPG.bac9ed7b77120aabc5520350bf8e1abf.JPG

 

IMG_6627.JPG.1a17a6f558dc40a241f85aed2c302746.JPG

 

You will note I have some surface blemishes which need to be addressed. Unfortunately having printed out all the parts I discovered they were to the wrong scale and did not really reflect any LNER variant of the Sentinels.

 

After the disappointment with the downloaded Sentinel I decided it might be interesting to produce my own model of the Clayton Railcar Trailers that were supplied to the LNER. My rational being that I could use the ends to experiment with slicer settings and try and improve print quality.

 

I came up with the following parts:

IMG_6656.JPG.17fa59b6787aaab6f6a714f5c8723a29.JPG

 

The vehicle features recessed doors and I wanted to print the sides flat-on-the-bed so had to produce the doors separately. The sides had strengthening strips added top and bottom over the door cutouts to hold the sides in place. Tabs were added to the corners of the sides to help stop the thin sections warping during printing.

 

Assembly was carried out using Deluxe Plastic Magic. The doors were fixed in place, the droplights fitted and the first side glued to the floor:

IMG_6640.JPG.1be0d7d7cbd7b5ae8fc2b869986ae806.JPG

 

The second side could then be added:

IMG_6641.JPG.b7c822ea57a035f3637a3ee5cde69a82.JPG

 

When the solvent had set the top and bottom alignment strips could be razor sawed off:

IMG_6643.JPG.38975e0d429a4234b1351ea3fa3cbd3a.JPG

 

First attempt at the roof with some warping evident in the corners:

IMG_6646.JPG.1170a6c50b03ab642e5f4777bb170fd5.JPG

 

Based on the first prototype I carried out lots of experiments in an attempt to improve the surface quality. I also took the opportunity to revise the original 3D model to improve it:

IMG_6658.JPG.c99e0fea923baaf71d9d630b5407ea1b.JPG

 

Experiments took place to try and eradicate the printing lines on the surface. This was acheived using a combination of knife scraping, sanding and spraying with Halfords' Filler Primer:

IMG_6668.JPG.be7b8def2eef7f66caafe6e7f4447e4d.JPG

 

IMG_6670.JPG.51a7f583d42ad36ac5dfae3c1796d4ea.JPG

 

Print quality does depend on print orientation. For the roof I ended up printing it vertically which gave the best print finish. The rainstrips being so small struggle to print well so I decided to take them off and leave grooves to allow strips of styrene to be added:

IMG_6671.JPG.07e58aa78c54433b6ca0642fec1a7763.JPG

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Without wishing to be too pedantic your resin printers were presumably MSLA, not DLP. 
 

Nice results on the Vyper though. I’ve never bothered to try and optimise my FDM printer, just use it for ‘functional’ parts, and stick with resin where I value finish!

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike I am looking forward to seeing what settings you believe will work best on your FDM printer. I recently bought an Ender 3 S1 hoping it might achieve results almost as good as a resin printer on 4mm wagons. Unfortunately I just have not had much time to play with it since it arrived, but the couple of N gauge items I scaled up to 4mm in the Creality slicer package printed as well as I could have hoped for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Carlislecitadel2 said:

Hi Mike I am looking forward to seeing what settings you believe will work best on your FDM printer. I recently bought an Ender 3 S1 hoping it might achieve results almost as good as a resin printer on 4mm wagons. Unfortunately I just have not had much time to play with it since it arrived, but the couple of N gauge items I scaled up to 4mm in the Creality slicer package printed as well as I could have hoped for.

I suspect it will be very difficult to match the print quality of a resin printer especially in the smaller scales. One thing I can state is I seem to get through far less filament printing things than I did resin printing things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with resin printing the model needs to be put through a slicer to produce the machines native gcode. In my case I am using the free version of Cura. Compared to resin printing there are a LOT of potential print settings to use.

 

Cura, on slicing a model, can display the paths the filament will be laid in. Taking the example of my Clayton Trailer side:

default.jpg.6a630e00d932ab2a15200be9b2c3eca5.jpg

 

By default here the top layer fill is diagonal which for railway parts may not be the most desirable. Cura does have settings to all the fill pattern to be configured to different angles but I found the easiest option was just to rotate the model 45 degrees in Cura:

 

rotated.jpg.951b84e347cd401b0d2e635e4f9ba83c.jpg

 

The settings on the right hand parameters allow theTop/Bottom Pattern to be changed. Here is ZigZag where you can see the pathfolds back on itself when it reaches edges:

zigzag.jpg.8cc1b7d1bc4a9724c7e12dc4ce3d505d.jpg

 

Concentric results in the following:

concentric.jpg.4b6344695573bde52cd66564551f43cd.jpg

 

Finally here is the same side with Lines:

lines.jpg.76482854d03967f819bfed63ca2dadaa.jpg

 

I mentioned I carried out lots of tests using the Clayton Trailer end. Here are a few of them. Closer study reveals the different fill patterns used to asses each:

IMG_6655.JPG.764bddc45a59c722d26ecb342971c7ff.JPG

 

I finally decided that using Lines parallel to the side gave the best result.

 

There is a feature in Cura called "Ironing" which adds an extra process to the extrusion and is supposed to give a very good surface. The end with Ironing enabled certainly had a very smooth finish however it rather destroyed the beading:

IMG_6649.JPG.b92dfe1c705e5c165b2048015df734a2.JPG

 

Following a comment by @JCL I tried printing a GNR carriage side at 7mm flat on the bed with the line pattern horizontal and at the minimum layer height of 0.06mm (the Vyper has a 0.4mm nozzle BTW). Stepping is very evident on the lower panels:

IMG_6673.JPG.e541676921070e65fea7f354d36ae08d.JPG

 

However taking just a section ofthe side and elevating it 45 degrees a far more acceptable finish results (yes there is still some tweaking to do):

IMG_6677.JPG.59bded2608c2a22798e7c0d44ca2c0d4.JPG

 

IMG_6679.JPG.8751e4d88bc00a525f65c1603dc89e77.JPG

 

Try as much as I can I cannot completely eradicate the surface markings on the Clayton sides and ends other than filing, sanding and priming. I have read that the quality of the nozzle as supplied with the Vyper is not very good so I have ordered some high quality ones from AliExpress and will repeat some of the tests when they arrive.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As an experiment I thought I would give the free version of Prusa Slicer a go. At the moment it does not have a profile for the Vyper but it is not too difficult to adapt an existing one.

 

For first attempts I have used sides and ends from a GNR fruit van produced by @JCL and @chris p bacon. Really please how they have turned out although they do need some additional tweaking. In all cases they have been printed flat on the bed at a 0.1mm layer height using Anycubic PLA with the print lines running horizontally. The last two images have had a light spray of Halfords' primer:

IMG_6702.JPG.37dae24ddf51ed5ed1b6002b8d4c8e55.JPG

 

IMG_6705.JPG.2a92a2b7836cef28c0aff599d0861d72.JPG

 

IMG_6707.JPG.1e29873b1d4df53dc058a1b8ca029cd8.JPG

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

There are some good videos on YouTube about stringing and also how to improve definition of prints. I have a cheap Aldi rebranded FDM printer and when I showed someone who also had a Resin printer he was very impressed with the quality and definition I am able to get. I use the supplied 0.04 nozzle. I am using the latest Cura slicer and have tweaked a lot of settings (after having enabled them).

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaulaDoesTrains said:

The latest Cura slicer, version 5, has a completely rewritten slicing engine which has been shown to produce noticeably improved detail compared to previous versions. The same engine can be found in the latest Prusa Slicer which I believe is still in beta.

Thanks. I am already using Cura V5.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...