Jump to content
 

Bachmann Peppercorn A2


Guest TomTank
 Share

Recommended Posts

Theories as follows:

Production slot missed or not allocated properly

models manufactured but fault discovered requiring corrective action.

All first batch sold and not available from Bachmann (but would this not still show up on schedule?)

Container lost on dock somewhere

Someone on a ship/Hong Kong has decided to build the Edinburgh/Aberdeen line and requires alot of A2s

 

Does seem very strange for a model to go from 60 days (which usually means production complete and awaiting shipping), to 'awaiting'. I could understand a later production date due to schedule slipping. Seems very strange.

 

The waiting continues....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Max Stafford

Better to take one's time and get it as right as you reasonably can. If indeed there is a problem which might not be the case!

There's an old saying; "We don't have time for short cuts". :)

 

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest TomTank

Blue Peter now back in the 60-day slot.

 

Dave.

 

Hmmm and interestingly Blue Peter has taken the place of A1 Great Central on the 60 day list... hopefully in time for Christmas then :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesentingly they have dropped Great Central off the radar.... Didn't they do it a couple of years ago?

 

As for Blue Peter release like you all mine's on order but with a 10 month "imminent" release I am not counting my chickens....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The new A1 is Great Eastern guys, not Great Central, which has indeed already been done. As to the delays, I think these must be down to things outside Bachmann's control - either production slots being changed or shipping problems. I can't imagine that they would want to make themselves open to unneccesary crticism, and appear hopelessly inefficient, by publishing details on the website that they had not been given assurances about at the time. We shall all just have to be patient I'm afraid, though it's not something I'm very good at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Max Stafford

I shouldn't have thought this would be a problem seeing as both models in all probability share a common block. The motor problems have never re-surfaced on the A1 or any other model as far as I know and I imagine the A1 and A2 would also share their motor too.

 

Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could it just be that there's a problem with part of the tooling? It's unfortunate for Bachmann that it's slipped in and out of the 60 day slot. What I find interesting is that the 7F is Dec/Jan I wouldn't be surprised if it were April/May or June next year

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the Bachmann A1 not long after it came out, for 'bashing' potential into A2 form, and came to the conclusion that there was too much to throw away to really contemplate this. Because Bach have the bolier and smokebox as one piece, from their perspective the major reuseable parts which contribute to external appearance would amount to the tender and cab plus backhead, the cylinder block, deflectors, front bogie and rear Cartazzi wheelset, and a few detail bits and pieces. Not a lot considering how similar these two classes look when belting along the main line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the notifications on 'in stock' & 'due dates' on the Bach webpage actually refer to the Barwell stores location? Having said that, I'm eagerly awaiting the 2 green versions of the Cravens unit (yes I know, its not an A2!) which I've pre-ordered with Trains4U; these have been reviewed in all the mags (presumably airfreighted) and are shown as delivered in the last 30 days, yet none of the dealers appears yet to have them delivered!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I looked at the Bachmann A1 not long after it came out, for 'bashing' potential into A2 form, and came to the conclusion that there was too much to throw away to really contemplate this. Because Bach have the bolier and smokebox as one piece, from their perspective the major reuseable parts which contribute to external appearance would amount to the tender and cab plus backhead, the cylinder block, deflectors, front bogie and rear Cartazzi wheelset, and a few detail bits and pieces. Not a lot considering how similar these two classes look when belting along the main line.

Hope I won't be out of place offering a few corrections:

Deflectors won't be interchangable, the front running plate (above cylinders) is lower on the A2 than the A1 (to accomodate the cylinders being lower due to smaller diameter driving wheels). Therefore the deflectors themselves will be taller (head to toe) on an A2 than an A1.

Similarly, I'll be interested to see if they'll reuse the A1 cylinders (just at a different height above the rail head), or if more changes are necessary.

 

My guess is that they committed to the A2 on the basis that they've got major body parts for the A1, and then discovered more work was necessary! I remember a quote on here regarding a mockup at the original announcement in July 08 which was assembled just to 'see if it was possible'.

 

If its the wheels they've corrected, I do hope they've got them round (a number of Bachmann locos have distinctly off-round wheels).

Happy to wait as long as it takes to get a good looking and running model at the end!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...