Ruston Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 I've only ever heard of the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway 2-4-2T engines being known as Radial Tanks but tofay I bought a book on Hull & Barnsley locomotives, published by the HMRS. On the cover is a H&B Class F2 0-6-2T, built by Kitson & Co. of Leeds. The picture is a maker's coloured photo and the loco is described as a "Hull, Barnsley & West Riding Junction Railway Six-coupled Radial Tank Engine. So, what exactly defines a Radial Tank Engine from any other tank engine? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pH Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 Here's a simple explanation of radial axles: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_axle Here's a discussion of modern diesel radial trucks, where each axial behaves 'radially' within the truck, rather than the truck behaving as a single, fixed unit: http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/741/t/132447.aspx 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steamport Southport Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 Someone will come up with a technical answer, but it was the fact that they had radial trucks rather than fixed frames or normal bogies. A radial axle is an axle on a railway locomotive or carriage which has been designed to move laterally, along the arc of a circle, when entering a curve in order to reduce the flange and rail wear. From Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radial_axle Jason Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcD Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 The Furness described there 0-6-2t as radial tanks but having resently got my hands on some GA drawings it turns out the had bissle trucks. I have some GA drawings for various NER locos that have a true radial axles. Are both correct? Marc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steamport Southport Posted April 14, 2018 Share Posted April 14, 2018 Two other types that are Radial Tanks. Obviously the LSWR Adams Radial Tank 4-4-2Ts and the LBSC E3/E4/E5/E6 0-6-2Ts. Jason Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted April 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2018 (edited) F.W. Webb was a great enthusiast for radial axles - if not their progenitor - and for many years would not go near bogies. Although Crewe wasn't in charge of carriage design for the LNWR, it did, I think, build or supply the components for iron/steel underframes as Wolverton didn't have the capability. This resulted in radial 8-wheel coaches - the two inner axles fixed and the outer axles radial. When well-maintained and very tightly coupled, they are said to have run very smoothly. Webb's various 2-4-2T and 0-6-2T classes all had radial axles for the carrying wheels. I'm away from my books so not sure about the leading axles of 2-4-0s. T.W. and Wilson Worsdell, with their Crewe training, were, as Furness Wagon notes, also radial enthusiasts. Edited April 15, 2018 by Compound2632 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenrithBeacon Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Churchward put a radial axle box on the trailing wheels for his 2-6-2T engines. Collett followed suit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim.snowdon Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 A very large proportion of all the locomotives that had a single trailing axle were provided with some form of radial axle. Actual trucks, ie with the axle rigidly mounted in a pivoting frame were unusual and generally confined to locomotives that had to cope with smaller than average curves. Their use on large locomotives in the UK can, I think, be attributed to Stanier, and developed by Bulleid. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LMS2968 Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 I think the leading wheels on FWW's 2-4-0s were rigid in the frame, but am open to persuasion. J.A.F Aspinall was one of FWW's premium apprentices and took the same design of radial axle to Horwich, causing FWW to demand royalties when he later found out! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted April 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2018 A very large proportion of all the locomotives that had a single trailing axle were provided with some form of radial axle. Actual trucks, ie with the axle rigidly mounted in a pivoting frame were unusual and generally confined to locomotives that had to cope with smaller than average curves. Their use on large locomotives in the UK can, I think, be attributed to Stanier, and developed by Bulleid. Jim Is a 2-6-0 large? Presumably the American moguls imported at the turn of the (twentieth) century had Bissel trucks but was Churchward first to use them on a home-grown engine? Or the SECR moguls? I wouldn't be surprised to be told that British engines built for export had been using them for years before this. I think the leading wheels on FWW's 2-4-0s were rigid in the frame, but am open to persuasion. J.A.F Aspinall was one of FWW's premium apprentices and took the same design of radial axle to Horwich, causing FWW to demand royalties when he later found out! I realised I should have included Aspinall in my list of Crewe-trained radial users. As far as I'm aware Adams didn't have a Crewe connection - did he develop the radial axle independently or was he in fact the originator, with Webb taking the idea up? There must have been sufficient differences in the design for Webb to have a patent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Ian J. Posted April 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2018 Reading up a bit on what a radial axle is/does (as I didn't know before reading this thread), I'm not surprised that the Adams Radial 4-4-2s were the only locomotives found best suited to the Lyme Regis branch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talltim Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 (edited) It’s funny, other tank engine types with a prefix describe the shape of the tank, side, pannier, well, etc. A newcomer to railways could easily be confused! Edited April 15, 2018 by Talltim 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 (edited) The radial axle rides withing its own frame, which in turn is cast like a banana which slides within runners. So the wheels don't just have side play; They also turn in an arc so they are in effect steering the chassis. Simplistic and understandable, I hope. Edited April 15, 2018 by coachmann Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grovenor Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 jim.snowdon, on 15 Apr 2018 - 09:41, said: A very large proportion of all the locomotives that had a single trailing axle were provided with some form of radial axle. Is a 2-6-0 large? Presumably the American moguls imported at the turn of the (twentieth) century had Bissel trucks but was Churchward first to use them on a home-grown engine? Or the SECR moguls? I wouldn't be surprised to be told that British engines built for export had been using them for years before this. Jim was careful to say "trailing axles", thereby excluding leading axles. Regards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruston Posted April 15, 2018 Author Share Posted April 15, 2018 The radial axle rides withing its own frame, which in turn is cast like a banana which slides within runners. So the wheels don't just have side play; They also turn in an arc so they are in effect steering the chassis. Simplistic and understandable, I hope. So, it's not a seperate bogie or a pony truck, it's an axle in a frame within the locomotive's main frames? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 A picture is worth a thousand words? The outsides of the axleboxes are angled so that when the wheels go into a curve the axle and axleboxes together move sideways with a radial motion. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Heres another example 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Compound2632 Posted April 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2018 Jim was careful to say "trailing axles", thereby excluding leading axles. Regards Jim, my apologies for not reading carefully enough. Grovenor, thank-you for pointing this out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PenrithBeacon Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 A very large proportion of all the locomotives that had a single trailing axle were provided with some form of radial axle. Actual trucks, ie with the axle rigidly mounted in a pivoting frame were unusual and generally confined to locomotives that had to cope with smaller than average curves. Their use on large locomotives in the UK can, I think, be attributed to Stanier, and developed by Bulleid. Jim Churchward used pony trucks on 2-6-0 and 2-8-0 designs, Hughes on the Horwich Mogul, Fowler on his 2-6-4T. There were others too, including Gresley. It’s a mistake too attribute the use of pony trucks to Stanier and Bulleid, then you shouldn’t forget Cartazzi of the GNR either.Essentially the radial axlebox is an implementation of the inclined plane and that goes back into deep time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Michael Edge Posted April 15, 2018 RMweb Premium Share Posted April 15, 2018 I think the leading wheels on FWW's 2-4-0s were rigid in the frame, but am open to persuasion. J.A.F Aspinall was one of FWW's premium apprentices and took the same design of radial axle to Horwich, causing FWW to demand royalties when he later found out! 2-4-0 tender loos normally had fixed leading axles, most tank locos with a single trailing were radial. Notable exceptions were the LNW "Bissel tanks", 0-4-2T with a pony truck and the SR 0-6-2T rebuilds of LBSC E1 0-6-0T - these (E1/R) used spare pony trucks from the Woolwich moguls. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcD Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 I though that to until I got the Furness GA's which were described as redial tanks on the GA but when you look at the actual drawing they all have bissel trucks. I thought they would have been similar to the LNWR/NER type. As the Furness tanks were design by W.F. Pettigrew, who was Adams's chief designer, has anyone had a good look at the Adam's radial GAs? Marc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grovenor Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 As the Furness tanks were design by W.F. Pettigrew, who was Adams's chief designer, has anyone had a good look at the Adam's radial GAs? Marc Post #17 above! Regards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim.snowdon Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Churchward used pony trucks on 2-6-0 and 2-8-0 designs, Hughes on the Horwich Mogul, Fowler on his 2-6-4T. There were others too, including Gresley. It’s a mistake too attribute the use of pony trucks to Stanier and Bulleid, then you shouldn’t forget Cartazzi of the GNR either. Essentially the radial axlebox is an implementation of the inclined plane and that goes back into deep time. I was referring to trailing axles, not leading ones. The situation with regard to leading axles is almost exactly the reverse - pony trucks were the normal arrangement, with radial axleboxes used relatively rarely. The Cartazzi arrangement adopted by Gresley is only another variety of radial axlebox. Jim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Johnster Posted April 16, 2018 RMweb Gold Share Posted April 16, 2018 Churchward put a radial axle box on the trailing wheels for his 2-6-2T engines. Collett followed suit. As he also followed suit with the 56xx 0-6-2T, a development of the Rhymney Railway 'R' class. South Wales 0-6-2T engines in general had radial trucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wickham Green Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 I was referring to trailing axles, not leading ones. The situation with regard to leading axles is almost exactly the reverse - pony trucks were the normal arrangement, with radial axleboxes used relatively rarely. The Cartazzi arrangement adopted by Gresley is only another variety of radial axlebox. Jim Indeed .... 'cos if you try to fit a pony truck at the rear of a loco you'll find someone's put a firebox where you want the pivot to go ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now