I like to view it positively in this way. Peco do steel sleeper track, C&L however do not. Peco do concrete sleeper points, C&L however do not. Peco Track is cheaper and you probably get an extra sleeper for every length of track, C&L track is more expensive and you get less sleepers per length of track. Peco points are inexpensive and ready made, C&L are however certainly not. Peco sleepers do not require a track base to form a good shoulder of ballast, C&L require a track base in order to have a shoulder of ballast there for creating more work. At the end of the day it comes down to C&L has a price tag of £110 per box of 25 (this is often a problem if you have a huge layout), Peco however has a price tag of £55 a box of 25. There are the key differences explained in great detail on RMweb already. My personal view is life is too short to build every single point from scratch and have it 100% accurate, and then count every sleeper, every bolt, every nut, every key and every chair on the track. If your not going to live long enough to see it finished then simply it's not worth doing because ''you'll be dead''. The advantage Peco track has over all others is it can be put down and trains can be running within a few weeks, no need to waste time building things that can be bought ready done although slightly less accurate. In today's world you might get the sunday and evenings off if your lucky so best to use the time wisely. I say this because I'm currently building a large layout for myself, but positively looking at fine scale track I suppose if your with a group of people in a club or building a very small layout then Fine scale track is a good idea. As for me I see Peco Code 75 track a good compromise between time saving, realism and detailing, there for I gladly pic it every time. These new sleeper tools seem a good idea and increase the realism but for ease of laying curves I believe a 'flexable' sleeper tool should be available, this would have the advantage of being used everywhere on the layout and for every situation, then the only compromise us basic average modeller has to put up with is point work - perhaps someone could invent a tool for this too! Happy Modelling Cheers, Reece