Jump to content
 

5&9Models

Members
  • Posts

    661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Blog Comments posted by 5&9Models

  1. 7 hours ago, Ravenser said:

    Just a thought , but was the bright idea behind the raised ends to provide a form of wind protection when running, the shelter preventing the passengers' hats being blown off? (That the feature did not become common suggests it was an idea that didn't work.)

     

    The original 3rd class coaches would have given a view forward . Those with raised ends wouldn't. We take it for granted that you can only see out of the side of a railway coach. Early passengers may have had a different expectation - are we seeing some daring passengers kneeling on the seat to get a view of the approaching tunnel over the top of the end , such as passengers in the other open coaches would get anyway?

    It’s possible. Of course it’s only a short step to putting a roof on and being able to justify the second class fare a bit more comfortably and there were plenty of carriages converted in that way. This one seems to be that odd ‘missing link’ in between.

    the attached pics show the second and an unconverted third.

     

    IMG_8036.jpeg

    IMG_8030.jpeg

    • Like 5
  2. 19 minutes ago, number6 said:

    I’m prepared to accept that early depictions of the railway might have been subject to some unfamiliarity by the artist! Like being aware of handed running? So in an image like that it may not have seemed important to have flipped it. See early images of giraffes or rhinos - until you’ve seen one for real hard to argue it’s incorrect! 

     

     

    D1C1C804-4E75-4BB5-982C-67DA12C48D25.jpeg

    Love the Pinguyn… with rabies?!! 😂

    • Like 1
  3. 21 hours ago, whart57 said:

    The engraver is not much cop if he makes a basic mistake like that.

     

    The engine up front looks to be a 0-2-2 like Rocket, not a 2-2-0 like the L&B Bury passenger engines, or indeed the L&M's Planet which replaced Rocket and it's class.

    Stephenson’s engines were not welcomed on the London & Birmingham. It was exclusively run with Edward Bury 2-2-0 and 0-4-0 locomotives. Any resemblance to Rocket or anything other than a Bury would be a lack of accuracy on the part of the artist. They did sometimes run the goods 0-4-0 engines on passenger services with the coupling rods removed so it could be intended to be one of those.

    • Like 1
  4. 14 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

    Wonderful. I suppose the standing lady in Bury's painting means it cannot be urinals then? 🙂

     

    Lovely figures too in very natural poses. Not Modelu I think?

     

     

     

    Thanks Mikkel, not urinals but what a thought....! The gent is ModelU but the two ladies I carved from dental plaster and cast in white metal. Ok as long as you don't look too closely, they resemble Morph!

    Morph.jpg

    • Like 5
  5. 8 hours ago, Dave John said:

    A nice model, it is an unusual vehicle.

     

    Looking at the engraving I see that each of the four end  coaches has a brakesman.  I wonder whether that would be the reason for running such coaches at the rear of the train ? 

    Thanks Dave,

    You're probably correct about the position of the braked carriages although not all carriages with roof seats were fitted with brakes. First class carriages had roof seats at both ends and if they were fitted with brakes only one seat had a brake handle. Apparently in the early days you could buy a roof seat ticket much as you might do on a stage coach journey. I doubt that was particularly popular!

    • Informative/Useful 1
  6. 23 minutes ago, Schooner said:

    What an exciting update! Useful too - tungsten putty is a new one to me and looks very handy indeed.

     

    FWIW, https://coventry1839.org/ might save readers a moment's confusion :)

    Thanks Schooner, and I'm immensely grateful to you for pointing out my blunder regarding the website address! I'd love to say I did it on purpose just to test you all but sadly that's quite untrue! I've amended the entry with the correct address. Tungsten putty is available easily online from fishing suppliers. It's not cheap but I find a little goes a long way.

    Cheers.

    • Like 2
  7. On 29/12/2022 at 18:26, Ruston said:

    This is superb! I don't see any pickups though and I can see that it's going to be very difficult to fit them to such open bar frames. Or are they going on the tender only?

    Sorry bit slow to reply. Thank you. No pick-ups in those pics but I’ve since fitted very discreet ones. Tender will have pick-ups on the rear wheels.

    • Like 1
  8. 4 minutes ago, figworthy said:

    I must say, they do look rather splendid.

     

    Should the wagon carrying the 4 wheeled carriage have the carriage shafts lashed down as well ?

     

    Adrian

    Thank you. The shaft of the four wheel carriage isn’t there, it’s already been detached. The splinter bar could be lashed down I suppose, not sure whether it’s necessary. I’ll look into it.

  9. 1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

    Lovely work on the loco. Out of curiosity, although it is metal it cannot weigh much given the size. Does it need added weight?


    Thanks Mikkel, yes, weight (or lack of it) is an issue. I milled out as little as possible from the copper firebox so that still has a reasonable weight to it but needs balancing at the smokebox end. Might be using up my little pot of tungsten putty!

    • Informative/Useful 1
  10. 33 minutes ago, Northroader said:

    Some real craftsmanship involved in doing this model. There’s an intriguing thread running on the the WT site. So far a L & B carriage has featured, but there’s a Bury goods lurking in the background, all done for 2 1/2” gauge!

    https://www.westernthunder.co.uk/threads/london-and-birmingham-rly-in-g3.10824/

     

    Thanks Northroader, I will check that out, sounds intriguing.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...