-
Posts
828 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Exhibition Layout Details
Store
Everything posted by Tom Burnham
-
Identifying old cars from their registration numbers
Tom Burnham replied to Jim Martin's topic in UK Prototype Questions
Kent Archives have some very early registration records - up to about the early 1920s at least - as handwritten ledgers. Other county records offices may well have similar for their own areas -
Pre Grouping Workbench content links
Tom Burnham replied to Graham_Muz's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
No, not that I saw. I think the owner had just picked up some items he liked the look of - there was also a 15 inch gauge Cagney 4-4-0 (built in America and retrieved from an amusement park in Peru I believe). The main feature was the extensive 2 ft gauge system and this was just a sideshow... Tom -
Pre Grouping Workbench content links
Tom Burnham replied to Graham_Muz's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
This very fine large-scale model of a Caledonian 2-4-0 was in the museum area at the Richmond Light Railway (mid-Kent) when I went to their annual open day a couple of weeks ago.- 49 replies
-
- 11
-
The Sheerness branch, which was pretty busy in its middle years, was single track until it was doubled south of Swale Halt for electrification in 1959. It had a reasonable passenger service (including two boat trains each way daily) and a fair number of excursion trains. Apart from general goods and domestic coal, it served the naval dockyard at Sheerness and (from the early 1900s) several factories and a coal wharf at Queenborough and Ridham Dock. When it opened in 1860, most of the structures apart from the road/rail lifting bridge were built wide enough for double track, although it was nearly 100 years until advantage was taken of that.
-
There were plans of the LBSC van in an old MRC - late 1940s maybe.
-
Some late Victorian prices
Tom Burnham replied to lanchester's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
Yes, particularly in terms of transporting goods for local industries and farmers. Steam traction engines and trailers were available for heavy loads but tended to damage the roads. They were expensive to run and the highway authority was liable to charge you for damage to the road if you were moving "extraordinary traffic" in the meaning of the Highways Act. And if a farm was more than two or three miles from a station, it was reckoned it needed to keep an extra carter, wagon and team of horses just for transport. This was all gone into in the debate before the Light Railways Act of 1896. -
Some late Victorian prices
Tom Burnham replied to lanchester's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
Indeed - as I understand it Victorian accountancy wasn't able to allocate costs and revenues to a particular line or service (and maybe not until the last 50 or 60 years). When the LCDR was discussing at a shareholders' meeting whether to take over the Sittingbourne to Sheerness branch, one of the shareholders said branch lines were usually spoken of as feeders, but in his view they were often suckers. Thus some people in Victorian times were dubious about the policy of expansion but generally didn't have the data to prove their case -
The SECR had some ex LCDR 6 wheelers rebuilt with gangways for ticket issuing by the guard on the Sheppey Light Railway - these may be the ones that ended up on the IoW in SR days, converted to 4 wheelers.
-
A LSWR, LBSC & SECR crossover point?
Tom Burnham replied to Olive_Green1923's topic in UK Prototype Questions
The ex-Brighton lines in East Sussex used SE&CR Trio-C 3-coach sets (mostly with 'birdcage' lookouts) increasingly from the late 1920s. Ex-SE&CR locos also appeared. There were some M7 tanks used also, although they're said to have been unpopular with crews used to the H class. The Southern converted a lot of compartment carriages from all 3 constituents to electric units (details are complicated) and this had an effect on the carriages used on the remaining steam services, especially in Kent and Sussex. Also there were width restrictions on certain lines - Maunsell corridor carriages were built to 3 different profiles reflecting the restrictions on the pre- Grouping lines. -
And I think there's a railway connection with the first photo, which looks like Hammersmith Terrace, childhood home of Colonel Holman Stephens, doyen of light railways.
-
I think dead-end branch termini were very much the exception in rural East Sussex away from the London suburbs and the coastal belt. Possibly because most secondary lines in that area were aimed at protecting "territory" rather than just serving a town bypassed by the main line. Brighton Kemp Town might give inspiration, with the line disappearing into a tunnel in the cliffs.
-
There seems to be a view that the Lord Nelsons were only moderately more powerful than the Maunsell King Arthurs in everyday working.
-
Pre Grouping layouts
Tom Burnham replied to Graham_Muz's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
Thanks - when we are that way again we'll try to see the layout in operation - 4pm to 5pm Wednesday was the only time we were able to go there on this visit. I should say I was also impressed by the view of the Study Centre through the glass door. -
Pre Grouping layouts
Tom Burnham replied to Graham_Muz's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
- 457 replies
-
- 12
-
Pre Grouping layouts
Tom Burnham replied to Graham_Muz's topic in Pre-Grouping - Modelling & Prototype
We were in Derby recently and visited the Museum of Making (used to be the Silk Mill). A couple of photos of the Kirtley Junction layout, 0 gauge, showing Midland Railway practice of the early 20th century. Evidently some work to finish reinstating it (no signals yet, for example) but it should be very impressive.- 457 replies
-
- 13