AY Mod

Apples and oranges.

The problem seems to be the photographers, not the models.

They were in the process but not, I don't think, where people were led to believe they were. As jjb said:

1 - I don't think we can. 2 - I'm not saying which of course but it depends what's more important at the time; the money or the model?

I think that one was a user error, it was a link to the document rather than a capture/upload.

We're down to the last few spots available now.

Such stigma pales into insignificance compared to leaving random alien objects in shot compounded by them going unnoticed in the photoshopping process.

The case being discussed there is nothing to do with DJM. It was an example shown to illustrate how a liquidator can conclude reports without full information. Starting to chuck incorrectly used words around such as 'slander' causes me to spend unnecessary time addressing the misplaced comments.

I asked him that too.

Turnover should have been well above the revenue threshold for at least a couple of years.

One of the casualties of the software change earlier this year was the Exhibition Layout Database which was a mess under the old software anyway. I have reconstructed this in a very simple format here - https://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/exhibition-layouts/ - this page can also be found via the Browse menu. If you wish to add your layout details including images and pertinent info as suggested please do feel free.

At least you can sleep at night. You may not have masses to show for the effort but at least it wasn't at the expense of others and have a millstone to carry for years. I don't mean that to sound glib as I know just how much can be taken up by making something work.

If you report posts in which an argument is taking place Phil I am somewhat limited in what I can do if the post you are porting uses the same phraseology as the response you are reporting. Also quoting things which you then report doesn't make it any easier to edit; so I won't.

I've taken a look at the Companies House entries for Final Accounts to be created as part of the liquidation of for other businesses where CG Recovery have handled the process and it seems that it takes 8-12 months where the situation is comparatively straightforward, the examples I looked at had a small number of unsecured creditors. So don't expect anything illuminating any time soon. However, they do seem to have the mechanisms to proceed even if full information isn't made available to them as shown in this example.

At the time of announcement of the 74 Dave asked me, as I had a view copy of the Class 71 CAD, if I could do a mock-up of the 74 end - not to deceive anyone that the CAD was at that stage but purely as an illustration. In hindsight I should have told him no, not because it was deceitful in any way but because, ultimately, too much use was made of 'favours' in general without Dave himself acquiring skills and putting leg-work in himself to do something which someone in that position should be doing. It was originally mentioned as I'd personally pressed Dave on this on 5th April 2018 (along with a very long list of concerns*) that there was no evidence that anyone had done any work on the 74 whatsoever beyond the photoshop mock-up of one end. Consequent to that Dave could not provide proof to Kernow that there had been any progress hence their laudable decision to put a stop to the process. We know that Kernow took a hit on costs in doing so but it was about doing the right thing at the right time, especially in hindsight. I understand Dave had offered to cover some of those costs incurred but I don't believe that ever happened. * Any responses to the concerns raised did not allay the fears I had on any of the points made.

There's some great off topic posts I'm having to hide just to stand a chance of keeping this one from self-defeating.

Have you tried the 2018 Jigsaw Puzzle yet? There's some pieces missing and there's some cloudy bits that you can't quite tell where they go but if you screw your eyes up and look at it there's no mistaking what it is.

There's plenty of parking on side streets close by if you're visiting for less than two hours - just make sure it's not a permit holders only space.

You widened it by heading it off to the sun. :p

Some users have quoted receipts itemising VAT on the deposit, which is as would be required. All mentions of 'investments' are red herrings; people were paying, by instalments, for a specific product and, as such, the Consumer Rights Act applies to all sales. Depositors did not buy shares or interests in the business/product and neither was the money any form of gift or donation.

We are aiming to give further benefits to our RMweb Gold members and we have arranged a special private viewing day at Pendon Museum on Friday October 18th at no additional charge above the membership fee. The event is limited in number and first dibs was given to the existing Gold members but we do have a very limited number of spaces left. If you would like to try and grab one of the spaces you can become a Gold Member by signing up here. Once you have signed up you can confirm you wish to join in by emailing rmwebgold@warnersgroup.co.uk It'll be a 10am start for coffee before we split into three groups. You'll then enjoy guided tours of the Madder Valley Railway, Dartmoor Scene and Vale Scene. There will also be a workshop by Mick Bonwick on 'weathering road vehicles' and a talk by Chris Webber, Tim Peacock and Martin Ray and meet the BRM team. A buffet lunch will be provided too and it's a social occasion too. The plan is to finish at around 4pm. RMweb Gold is our new membership scheme that brings with it a whole host of benefits: All members benefit from: • Access to the BRM Digital Library – 160+ magazines going back to 2007, plus all future issues. • One free ticket to a Warners exhibition each year. • Free copy of 'How to Build Your First Trainset' bookzine (complete with DVD). • The ability to sell products in the new RMweb.co.uk ‘Classified’ area. • RMweb.co.uk unlimited image size ability per post. • RMweb.co.uk increased PM storage. • RMweb.co.uk Private Personal Image Gallery. • Exclusive RMweb.co.uk Gold Private Forum.

Only one person could answer the "why?" question there, but he's not likely to. I can imagine the liquidators running through famous Donald Rumsfeld lines when they look at numbers.

There's no proof of either of those statements so they can't be considered a summary.

You're right, I'm not sure anyone ever will get a wholly correct set of figures as the liquidators didn't seem particularly bothered whether a full list of consumer creditors would be built (if not provided by the Director), if an individual wants to be listed than they may get on the list (but won't get anything) but I suspect most won't bother if they get a credit card refund (surely they were still a creditor at the point of ceasing trade and it's the credit card businesses who reimbursed the customer - whether they then have claim to be a creditor if they cannot claw back funds is up to them I guess and some people (probably mostly Paypal customers) just write it off to experience. In my conversation last week I explained that I may have a useful overview but they didn't even ask for contact information. In, out, next.

Disappointingly few cinemas screening around these parts but I'm determined to see it. May just wait for Blu-Ray as I'll keep wanting to re-watch bits.