big T, on 05 September 2010 - 13:34 , said:
The last couple of years have been a complete sham with the run down of 56's, 58's and 60's. ...
This is what happens when accountants run businesses.
FARCICAL.
EWS weren't / DBS aren't running a spotter's benefit. Is there any evidence that not having the 56s or 58s in their fleet has interfered with their ability to run the trains that they wanted to run? Have you done the costings that demonstrate that retaining and maintaining a fleet of 60s would be cheaper, overall, than using a fleet of 66s (and some 59s, I suppose)?
I like the 60s as much as the next person; I'm sorry to see their gradual demise; but that demise is neither farcical nor a sham. It's the way of things, just like the demise of the Deltics, the Westerns, the 9Fs and pre-grouping steam was. And I'm sorry to say it - and I know that it's hopelessly unsexy to say this - but what happens when accountants don't run businesses is that they go bust, usually in pretty short order.
Jim
Rubbish, if BR still existed I suspect these loco's would still be working and better looked after.
Keith