Zero Gravitas

“A beginner's guide to dry airbrushing techniques” What is dry airbrushing? I’ve heard of airbrushing, and of dry brushing, but never dry airbrushing... or is it a cunning scheme to pique my curiosity to the extent that I buy the magazine to find out

I think you’re right. One thing - you mentioned in the OP that the car would be registered in his name. I think that would be the problem for the insurance company - why is he not the main driver if the car is registered in his name? If you registered the car in your name and you were the main driver with him as a named driver, it’s much more difficult for any insurance company to argue that he is not an occasional driver.

It doesn’t matter who I think the main driver is - that’s why I edited my post. If something happens and the insurance company find he’s driving a car registered in his name, some distance from home and he’s only a named driver then the insurance company’s interpretation is likely to be fronting, which opens up a whole new world of insurance pain... It all depends on your risk appetite...

Interestingly (having been through this with two offspring now) it’s often more expensive to insure that sort of small-engined small car because that’s what most new drivers have and so the claim fate against that type of vehicle is higher. Often a larger, duller car is better for starters - daughter ended up with a 1.8 diesel focus estate that was cheaper to insure than a 1.3 petrol fiesta... Putting yourself as a named driver definitely helps (assuming you own driving record is good :-) ), and really shop around...

One tiny problem - what you’re proposing could easily be interpreted as “fronting” and is illegal: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/money-made-easy/why-fronting-for-your-child-could-cost-you-dear/ Probably not a good idea. (Edited to make it clearer that the interpretation is important)

FYI - Tesco are currently selling a twin pack of Model Rail July 2018 and Ideas for Layouts Volume 3 for £4.99.

Yes. 112 so far. However, for a bit of perspective, at my local parkrun on Saturday, one runner was celebrating his 250th parkrun - at the age of 85... I’ve still got a bit of a way to go.

Firstly, and very, very importantly: Never, ever, ever phone a private parking company. Ever. What has happened to you is, in spite of their claims that their ANPR equipment is infallible, so common that it has its own name - it’s called a “double dip”. The best advice now is go to the parking tickets forum on the moneysavingexpert website: https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/forumdisplay.php?f=163 There’s a “newbies” thread that explains what you should do. One of the main reasons for not phoning the parking company is that if you do they will try and get you to admit you were driving, which will remove one of your most important protections in law. This is all explained in the linked forum. It’s important to be aware that you are dealing with an unregulated and unscrupulous industry that cares not a jot for reasonable behaviour and is only interested to parting you from your money using what amounts to a scam.

An FYI on parking... the private parking contractor at the hospital is a company called UKPC. UKPC are currently banned by the DVLA from access to their database, meaning that at the moment UKPC cannot find out to who owns a vehicle and whom they might attempt to hold liable for any tickets that UKPC have issued. It is not known why UKPC have been banned, but they have been banned before. The last time it was because they had been caught falsifying the time stamps on photos of cars to make it appear as though they had been parked for longer than they actually had in order to issue tickets. So, if you have received a ticket on your car from UKPC this weekend the advice is to ignore it and make no contact with UKPC whatsoever. They can can only find out who you are if you tell them. HTH.

FYI - subs copy arrived this morning. And for the record: Mrs. Trellis - I salute you. Your Tiny Ruston* is exquisite modelling and is truly a thing of beauty. It’s not my gauge or my time period, but it’s absolutely the sort of thing for which I get MRJ. * for any ISIHAC fans - this is not a euphemism...

There was quite a long discussion about subscription in the MRJ 262 thread - my post #19 explained what I think is happening. I’m not technically competent enough to link to that post, so here’s the text cut and pasted: “I’m pretty sure that Cygnet can defend themselves and I’m also pretty sure that this has been explained before, although I can’t immediately find the relevant post. So... If you’re a “big” publication, then your printer tends to handle your distribution as well. So they print the mag, bag up and post the subscription copies and send the rest out to the newsagent through the usual channels, hence subs copies tend to arrive before the shop copies. However, if you’re a “small” publication (and in the overall scheme of publishing things, MRJ is pretty small) the magazine is printed, newsagent copies are distributed and the subs copies are sent back to the publisher, who then bags up and posts; hence the subs copies tend to arrive after the shop copies. I subscribe to MRJ to make sure I always get a copy, not because I want to get it more quickly. And to paraphrase something I’ve posted before, a world in which I receive my copy of MRJ after it is on sale in WHS Ealing is still infinitely preferable to one where there is no MRJ at all.”

I see Mrs. Trellis has been promoted from the letters page...

Brilliant - Adam, thank you very much indeed!

That Prestwin is a thing of beauty - but you tease with the brake linkages... any chance of a photo of the underside to see your interpretation, please :-)

I’d actually say that for me, it’s the best trade including Warley. And given the choice of attending Railex or Warley, Railex would win every time. And I find that I don’t think of shows in terms of scale representation. For me, the question is whether there is modelling that I will admire, and which will excite and inspire me. And that’s got nothing to do with scale.

Adam, I’m slightly ashamed to say I’ve had a part-completed Prestwin in a box for literally 25 years because I can’t work how how the brake gear actually all fits together... if you’ve got any clues, I’d be very grateful and might even celebrate by finishing the thing...

Splendid! With a bit of luck, it'll be waiting for me when I get back from Shanghai tomorrow night (Virgin Atlantic willing). I'm particularly excited to see a new Martyn Welch article - I'm presuming it's about unpainted wood (a particular interest of mine, sadly).

Pecketts. Oh God. So many Pecketts..

Why can I now not get the Velvet Underground "I'm Waiting for the Man" out of my head? We all just need that next fix of MRJ...

Well, there are April Fools that bend plausibility just enough to be believed; and then there are those that fundamentally trash all of the laws of the known universe...

I’m pretty sure that Cygnet can defend themselves and I’m also pretty sure that this has been explained before, although I can’t immediately find the relevant post. So... If you’re a “big” publication, then your printer tends to handle your distribution as well. So they print the mag, bag up and post the subscription copies and send the rest out to the newsagent through the usual channels, hence subs copies tend to arrive before the shop copies. However, if you’re a “small” publication (and in the overall scheme of publishing things, MRJ is pretty small) the magazine is printed, newsagent copies are distributed and the subs copies are sent back to the publisher, who then bags up and posts; hence the subs copies tend to arrive after the shop copies. I subscribe to MRJ to make sure I always get a copy, not because I want to get it more quickly. And to paraphrase something I’ve posted before, a world in which I receive my copy of MRJ after it is on sale in WHS Ealing is still infinitely preferable to one where there is no MRJ at all.

And there was I expecting a picture of lots of bits of wood, and wondering what made them specifically GWR...

Except, of course, when you need to renew your MRJ subscription...

Sometimes I hate myself for biting... but where’s the “disagree” button when you really need it? Whilst I have no desire to be unnecessarily critical - and being mindful of the fact that I have been accused of bringing MRJ threads into disrepute on more than one occasion, I don’t feel I can let this pass without comment. Rather than just say that it’s “poor”, could you be ever so slightly more specific about what led to this conclusion? Is it that the contents do not reflect your particular interests; or perhaps that the contents did reflect your interests, but not in a way that you found helpful, or informative, or inspiring. And if not, what would you like to see? And how would having a permanent editor improve this situation, do you think? What would be different and how would that deal with the apparently ongoing “poorness” issue? There’s already been one instance this week of a small supplier withdrawing a product range because of negative comments posted on RMWeb; and whilst I don’t think Cygnet will take their ball home about this, I do think we have some responsibility to be at the very least constructively critical, rather than just appearing to have a moan. Perhaps it’s just because I’m a bit grumpy because I’m off with man flu at the moment, but a world in which there is an issue of MRJ that is not as fantastic as I might like it to be is still infinitely preferably to one where there is no MRJ at all. Yours - quite literally - snottily, Z.G.

I’ve got the Proxxon FBS240E and I’ve been very pleased with it. I also have the Micromot drill stand, and have had no problems will small drills at any speed. Hope that helps.