dj_crisp

Layouts looking great! From my electrical numptys viewpoint I've found wiring my layout for DCC easier than DC. I couldn't tell you if I have less or more wires though! I've gone for the approach of wiring each section of rail which I'd have done for both DC or DCC. Where things are easier for me to understand is things like lights, accessories or controlling points. I just wire up the input wires to the DCC device and wire up the corresponding output wires to the item. There's no control panel to wire up as I can get a PC to do that or atm as things are simple I'm just using my phone. Although I intend getting a cheapo tablet to replace that soon. And it's nice driving trains up to others.... messing about with lights etc which is easier on DCC.

This is brilliant! Hmmm I was too late to order any 2cs and I have one too many 2b TSOs for my eventual waterloo to exeter rake. I might just have to do some copying :)

Enjoy your weekend and a few pints! Cheers Will

They aren't too bright so I doubt anyone will really know with mine. I'll have a look to see how my Bachmann 158 works out of general curiosity.

I used my sprog and decoder pro to programme... when reading the decoder type cv it gave hundreds of options then with the help from this forum I found the right light bar option. Then it's plain sailing. I've got 2 mk2f sets and have so far only programmed my virgin one. It was a breeze in the end. As there's an option to have CDLs operating one side or the other or both they're now directional as well as the tail lights. I've never really noticed if CDL lights illuminate platform only side or both on the real thing tbh!

That's interesting. Did you use the standard coupling with the magnetic coupling? When i tried the supplied magnetic coupling i had a much larger gap whereas yours looks great on the straight.

Thanks - your post inspired me to have a go and trial one to see if I can convert mine using a similar approach. Fits the space and predrilled hole perfectly. Brilliant. The only difference is I now prefer hunt magnetic couplings over kadees to couple intermediate stock. I've used them on all of my DMUs and I'm pleased with them. Hopefully one day there'll be a similar coupling with a smaller head but they're quite hard to see under a corridor connector anyway. I've lost my lifetime warranty on the shells though 😉 The corridor connectors are Keens for MK2s which I've altered the shape along the roof line ever so slightly to match Accurascale/Bachmann. It does mean drilling the lovely end doors, and removing a little detail which always feels terrible! I've also trimmed down the Accurascale connector to allow enough space for the springing to work, and to let them go round curves which also needs a slight trim of the supplied spring. The only downside to this is the Accurascale corridor connector is hollow so I'll need to fill this attempt in, but on others I might try and not file through to the hollowed bit. I set my stock up to go round 4ft radius curves which these will do... probably can go a little tighter.... below is shot on a curve coupled to a MK2f I was tempted to keep the original close coupling but generally prefer a simpler setup even if it means my coaches are coupled a little wide. With the magnetic coupling and sprung connectors there's no slack or a pick up goods loose coupling effect 😀 The only downside to this approach is I've now got permanent inner coaches and need to plan my outer ones. Still it focuses me on producing a rake. Even if the solution is a little crude there's no gaps in corridors between coaches! My no1 pet hate! Cheers Will

I'll be interested in hearing how you get on... there's a few items that look like just what I need that'll help for my current projects.... and I have no chance in printing myself

Hi Mike Agreed. I have a few photos in my favs of services labelled as going to Barnstaple in the 80s such as (cant share those actually on the line). Were these the Saturday summer specials? Cheers Will

In my modelling world there are some such as Barnstaple to Exeter, I think Newquay had some too. Never quite sure whether the Scottish far North or West highland lines count as branchlines ;)

Now you've mentioned it I may just have to correct my Hattons version.... or do a bit of heavier weathering. A good spot!

Yeah the Bachmann 66 always looked underscale to me in comparison to other stock. Whereas the Hattons one seemed bigger and had more layout presence to me. So I briefly owned a Bachmann 66 until the Hattons versions came out 😉

Thanks for sharing this... interesting that the kadee fits so well. I'm currently using kadee housing and hunt magnetic couplings on my coaching stock for middle vehicles so will be trying something very similar to you. I'll also plan to add some keen sprung corridor connectors which I like to use as they absorb any coupling slop. Sadly means a bit of hacking of the coaches!

Yes... totally agree with you. The major dimensions on some of the older models were great. Then if you can add shawplan frames a very nice model can be made. I've got a few of Brian's etches and plan to add to some mk1s (NSE ones so easy on the respray ;) )

The arrival of Accurascale MK2bs has inspired me to sort out my long term coach projects and actually focus on finishing some rakes. So I've dug out my Bachmann MK2fs and along with some nice MK2bs have spent an age re-wheeling them all to EM (about 18 in total hence me being so quiet on here!). One positive of re-wheeling is I can then try and get them to all to ride at similar heights in a rake. Both Bachman and Accurascale benefit from reducing slop which raises them ever so slightly but based on my dodgy measuring does result in spot on a height for the MK2f and a very close one for the MK2b. There will be some variation but then the real thing also had! The coaching stock review has seen me sell off all my Bachmann MK2a coaches bar one that I've kept for sentimental reasons and one i may raid in a MK2d FK project i have in mind. While the body sides are ok I've never liked the roof which is noticeably higher than the Mk2f or Mk2b.... so I look forward to an Accurascale MK2a announcement! So thoughts have moved to MK1s which again I've always felt Bachmanns effort rides too high.... especially with commonwealth bogies. So I've spent a while trying to get it looking ok amongst the MK2s. I'm using Brassmaster bogies and sticking on the sides of the original bogie frames. In fact ive cheated and stuck them on off centre to allow a gap between the bogie and body. Hopefully that bodge is passable. Again Im thinking the bodysides are ok with the roof being a smidge high as seen in the photo below. Now the Bachmann MK1 body is basically a kit of parts (i really wish it wasnt and was one piece). Ive noticed my RMB is badly fitted so ive taken the RMB apart to investigate any problems.... number 1 being the sides are glued to the ends which resulted in me cracking one end! Grrr. A real nasty fix to add to the project list! I guess that's the fun in modelling.... I wonder if someone will announce a retooled MK1?

Pretty much as Nick says. There's alot of underframe improvements that can be done with extra detail thats missing. Using the 150 is a good idea that i hadnt thought about. One main issue with the 153 is the wheel sizes are way too large which really messes things up. A big improvement is better corridor connectors as this helps improve the face somewhat. From the hurst etch the cab side windows are useful. I did have a mad moment planning on grafting on a Dapol 155 roof and using the hurst conversion kit fronts but rumours of a new model hitting the market in the next few years mean I've sold up my project as recently as last week. I'm rather surprised this one hasn't been retooled sooner tbh.... its a small unit that has trundled all over the country with loads of liveries. Good luck with yours!

I'd prefer an alternative to knackered and ready for the scrap heap :)

Interesting points which are all valid but I'd have expected Heljan to compare info collected in the field with production drawings and measurements which must be available for the 47. I wonder if the body can be raised to create more of a gap between the body and the bogies as for me the side view really spoils this one.

I think there's space for celebrity locos but only ones that don't need a heavily revised tooling. Me I just like some nice 47/7s in NSE :)

Thanks for the offer. I'm trying to do something with DCC so will see if I can do something that works. If not I'll be in touch! Cheers Will

Hi Bruce! Many thanks for your detailed reply.... you can guess what I've been playing with the last few days ;) Sounds like I need to try something alternative... maybe a DCC lightbar or similar. I'll have a think. Cheers Will

I'm just looking at adding flashing tail lights and thinking that adding a DCC decoder could be a solution. In my searches i saw this comment and just wondered if anyone's looked at adding a function decoder to the existing circuit? Have to admit ive no idea how to do the hack! I guess an alternative option is to wire up a function and common output from the decoder to the pickups? Ta Will

Hi Bruce Many Thanks for your help which has resulted in me finding it in decoder pro...! All working fine now and I can reprogram to my preferred set up :) cheers Will

Sorry if this has already been discussed but searching and reading the thread I didn't find the answer i was looking for. Does anyone know which ESU decoder has been used in the DCC fitted versions - I'm using a sprog and that gives me many options so I'm not sure which one to use. My aim is just to change the DCC address, swap direction on a few coaches (for tail lights) and change the function mapping. Currently i can read a coach but not write so i think i've chosen the wrong one. thanks! Will

Thanks again for the info. I've very crudely added some detail to the BSO guards interior that could be viewed from the exterior. Opening the windows out meant I needed to remove Bachmanns attempt at a brake wheel and as its visible Ive addedd a stenson wheel instead. The base maybe improved if i can see it when illuminated but for the time being is a quick and simple approach. There's another window added to side.