Jump to content
 

A Pantechnicon for Farthing


Mikkel

2,109 views

001.jpg.477e8e913e49e38194c35ce96978219a.jpg

 

A horse-drawn furniture removal van has appeared at Farthing. The kit is a reborn Gem product, marketed under the John Day Models label alongside other re-introduced whitemetal ranges. It’s all run by Daryle Toney who is very helpful (no connection).

 

 

002.jpg.c1128dc8a8ed1a536fc918c00fe3ca80.jpg

 

The main parts are a fair fit. As usual I used Loctite Gel to stick it together. Unlike most superglues it does not require a perfect join to bond well.

 

 

003.jpg.e86cca1ee22706fe15026e1ebaff7094.jpg

 

Some parts did require fettling. This is the front of the van. I filed the sides a bit and shortened the supporting bracket.

 

 

004.jpg.df3768f543e4ba09a5ebf5e2e6025db8.jpg 
Coming together. It’s quite a beast. If Wikipedia is to be trusted, Pantechnicons ranged from 12-18 ft in length. That’s 49-72 mms in 1:76 scale. The kit is 67 mms long. It’s also quite tall, more so than the common types seen in photos.

 

 

005.jpg.763472075983e738b036f6fa4cbf597c.jpg


For some reason the parts for the end section get in the way of each other, so required a bit of work. First the brackets on the end panels were shortened, using the “Salami method”.

 

 

006.jpg.09968c411ad938605fc760990866fcbd.jpg

 

The lower floor casting doesn’t line up with the end panels. The instructions suggest shortening the panels, but after consulting prototype photos I chose instead to saw off bits of the floor casting itself. 

 

 

007.jpg.8024c3e09946df66fa3bbc8505b8d4e6.jpg 
This allowed everything to line up nicely, with a section of styrene employed as gap filler. 

 

 

008.jpg.2e1027934e6d8d6c548b75d0d68e7f53.jpg


I then entombed the ghost of Mrs X in the van. Mother of a childhood classmate, she once tore into me for spilling cocoa on her sofa. It wasn’t my fault, her son pushed me, but she wouldn’t listen. I hereby condemn her to travel forever in this empty furniture van, with not even a pillow to sit on.

 

 

009.jpg.dbb736b3bd7456f22f5a4df4d5c49a51.jpg

 
Two padlocks seal her fate. Goodbye Mrs X, nobody messes with a railway modeller.

 

 

010.jpg.4afcfda6267aecf50ff0b50c6941ef6e.jpg


I couldn’t find room to fit the rear springs properly, so cut a notch in them for the axle.

 

 

011.jpg.bf46044a584588637fa393164ed0e218.jpg

 
You can’t see the dodge once the wheels are on.  I would have preferred slimmer wheels but couldn’t find appropriate replacements. Filing the spokes rarely leads to good results, so I’ll live with it.

 

 

012.jpg.6f30d93f4c4ce64b457f4c1b7f98dacb.jpg

 

A simple piece of plastikard prevents the fore-carriage from dropping off, while still being free to rotate.

 

 

013.jpg.ed5772303bfe53b6a997c10565b43abb.jpg 
The driver’s seat was filed to a more discrete size. Judging by preserved Pantechnicons, it was actually more common for the driver to sit on the roof, but I did find one or two photos with a lower seat.

 

 

014.jpg.a2a0c9d0db9d8ca1c7fa47ad20e3606b.jpg

 

Bits of 0.45mm wire were added for arm rests and supports. The foot-rest was raised a bit to match the driver. Forgot to scribe it but managed it later.

 

 

015.jpg.72b62e1f4719449837224e0a6133e212.jpg 
The shafts are fitted with bits of wire, which plug into holes in the fore-carriage.

 

 

016.jpg.46b1264a67ddb8b93bc4e23cbd88a8e9.jpg

 

The horse is included in the kit. The driver is a seated passenger from Andrew Stadden’s range. 

 

 

017.jpg.35043c036aeb9f678d47ac58ad36af15.jpg

 
At this point I was confronted by a delegation from United British Draught-horses for Liberty and Equine Defence (UNBRIDLED). They informed me in no uncertain neighs that a large Pantechnicon requires at least two horses.

 

 

018.jpg.41870656c6b1d7e4f2939471eed3014a.jpg

 
So I hastily fashioned a two-horse drawbar...

 

 

019.jpg.a7bafc9e9f778256f87afe29cc027f6b.jpg

 

...and ordered a couple of Shire horses from Dart Castings.

 

 

020.jpg.0576a9db66bf941a0f2b49e0233a2fc2.jpg

 
Fearing further industrial action, I added some steps and grab handles for the driver. Then primed the whole thing.

 

 

022.jpg.2682e3d399abdefa249e0f4313beb70b.jpg


Next, the livery. The prototypes were often extensively lettered.

 

 

021.jpg.f107cf96e0d5dff0b6afd58a2e42ec9a.jpg

 
And colourful. I normally go for subdued colours, but it’s been a dreary winter and I felt like a bit of Rock & Roll, so took inspiration from this striking example.

 

 

023.jpg.29f2566378cc81b1b265e5101f1e6200.jpg

 
I spent some time drawing up various designs in Microsoft Word, which has more options for sizing and spacing text than is at first apparent.

 

 

023b.jpg.9df231069b5f00744b9ffb5858d1cf4a.jpg

  
The curves were made to fit by importing a photo of the model into Inkscape, drawing the appropriate curves and then copying the shapes back into Word.

 

 

024.jpg.8bdf5e05bd0c5da49146ff4433b543c5.jpg 
I printed selected designs on paper, sprayed them with matt primer to protect the colours, and cut them with a fresh blade. Paper is of course a bit crude compared to DIY transfers, but it’s straightforward and you can test designs directly on the model. @kirtleypete has even used it for locos.

 

 

025.jpg.723946e971d7c574d545e23853888f94.jpg

 

The van was painted yellow and black, and the paper then mounted with a thin layer of lightly diluted PVA.  

 

026.jpg.f36b16b0cd3bef3423c16d5759b3d060.jpg

 
Final details included a driver’s handwheel for the brakes, plus tarps, rope and other rooftop clutter. 

 


027.jpg.5fb80c02bf146c9e0e7b7b2b9f93976a.jpg

 

I added some chains from Cambrian Models and finished off with MIG weathering powders. The odd-looking loading flap is prototypical, if rather chunky.

 

 

028.jpg.0379e19f6fd9916c67da1858cbbe3616.jpg

 
I also fitted chains to the Shire horses, mounted with a wire loop drilled into the harness. Looks like the Oryx wants in on their gig, probably an agent from DISRUPT (Dissident Ruminants for Progressive Transport).
 

 

29b(2).jpg.a0d4563cda494382f23b8fc50f81b873.jpg

 

As usual, there are no reins. My layouts are set up and dismantled all the time, so the normal solutions – e.g. fuse wire - are just not practical. What I need is something thin yet robust enough to fit quickly with a pair of tweezers. Ideas welcome.

 

 

 030.jpg.64904181ec00b09c25d76a9c97a10d97.jpg

 

As you can see, Bailey & Sons’ strategy was to locate their offices at railheads along the Berks & Hants line. This worked well and the company grew to become one of the major removal firms in the area.

 

 

031.jpg.3a693445f4cad99af4cdb4cb1c8f4531.jpg

 
Yet for Mr Bailey, Senior - lover of all things yellow – it was a source of constant irritation that his horses didn’t match his vans. 

 

 

29.jpg.e1c9927ea5dbf46dcc56e932d6e13413.jpg


Eventually Mr Bailey proposed to dye the horses yellow. 

 

 

032.jpg.fc228cd7a835317ea7863c61eb3745e0.jpg

 

But his sons - brought up in a sickening sea of yellow - finally rebelled and said no, father, enough now.


 

Edited by Mikkel

  • Like 24
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 26
  • Round of applause 28

57 Comments


Recommended Comments



4 hours ago, ullypug said:

Excellent modelling Mikkel.

It took a slightly dark tone there for a minute, a properly Scandinavian melancholy with shades of Edgar Allen Poe…

 

Entombing people is nothing compared with the dark deeds in this post   😮

  • Agree 1
  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

21 hours ago, richbrummitt said:

Bravo.
 

I note that the etched padlocks do not come with either etched keys or etched bolt-croppers. 

 

Ha ha, thanks Rich. Nope, I've thrown them away! What does stand out in the close-ups is that the padlock shackles don't pass through anything. Must do that better next time. 

 

 

12 hours ago, gwr517 said:

Another wonderful addition to Farthing.

Douglas Firth.

 

Many thanks Douglas. It seems that there are 11 horsedrawn vehicles at Farthing now, from GWR and local traders. More than is needed really, but I do enjoy building them. 

 

 

11 hours ago, Johann Marsbar said:

   in Colchester had this preserved example which they used for special events back in the early 1980's....

 

r81-142.jpg.c595d0fe6de4d0cd81b6e8641d14436a.jpg

 

What happened to it after that isn't clear, but I've never seen it anywhere since that time.

 

Interesting, I wonder if it the same as this one, from the same company, which seems to have been in the National Brewery Museum at one point:

 

52451873994_aa7bbb5946_h.jpgWilliams and Griffin horse-drawn Pantechnicon by Steve Knight, on Flickr

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 6
  • Round of applause 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

10 hours ago, C126 said:

Wonderful work as always @Mikkel .  Yellow was seen as 'decadent' from the 1870's onwards, I think stemming from the 'yellow-back' books.

 

https://artuk.org/discover/stories/colour-in-the-victorian-era-a-new-chromatic-age

 

 

 

Many thanks, also for that link - an enlightening read. I did not know about the Victorian colour explosion, it has made me see the pregrouping liveries in a new light. The "Decadent young woman" is superb, and I notice her yellow book!

 

 

9 hours ago, jwealleans said:

I have been looking for whomever made these and now find I have two sources thanks to this thread,  

 

There was a nice rail transported example on Penlan which I photographed some years ago:

 

spacer.png

 

Ah, very nice. Jonathan I think the Shirescenes version is your best bet if you are looking for one to go in a train (although it is currently sold out).

 

The Gem/John Day kit is so tall that I think it might be out of loading gauge, even with the roof boards folded down. So I clearly need another lower one if I am to fulfill the company's promises!

 

 

9 hours ago, magmouse said:

Very lovely work, as always, Mikkel, and a delightful continuation of your 'narrative' approach to modelling. I am looking forward to seeing what stories and characters we may encounter when Bailey's pantechnicon arrives in the good yard at Farthing.

 

For anyone considering loading a pantechnicon on a wagon, as in Penlan's example posted by @jwealleans, it is worth noting that the roof boards were either removable or in some cases hinged to fold down. This reduced to height, to keep within the loading gauge.

 

The HMRS website has their archive of images with quite a few examples of pantechnicons, which are useful for liveries. Also, pantechnicons feature in this discussion on the closely-related topic of 'lift vans' (early containers intended mainly for furniture):

 

 

Regarding the number of horses, in the pictures I have found, two seems standard. I haven't found any pictures showing four, and given the main use of pantechnicons was the transport of furniture and household effects, I suspect the load would never be that great. I write this in the hope that someone will prove me wrong, and so expand the body of available evidence!

 

Nick.

 

 

Thank you Nick, some very useful info there. The HMRS images sound like gold, very tempting!

 

Here are some shots with different numbers of horses, it seems to have varied with the needs an capacity:

 

van.JPG.f64813c2489cd8f39e999f64100a9cc2.JPG

 

jb-moving-services-pantechnicon.jpg.a15e02eabcf41b03303b2601506cd59e.jpg

 

   Udklip.JPG.79810f61f3e3c307abebe5bd04e27ffa.JPG

 

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 9
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
6 hours ago, ullypug said:

Excellent modelling Mikkel.

It took a slightly dark tone there for a minute, a properly Scandinavian melancholy with shades of Edgar Allen Poe…

 

It's the lack of light that makes us gloomy. Come to think of it, you're not much better off! 😄

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
42 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Here are some shots with different numbers of horses, it seems to have varied with the needs an capacity:

One thing I noticed was how narrow the wheel rims were on all the wagons in the photographs.  A sign of the improvement in roads since the earlier (1844) Knee's Pantechnicon that I modelled, on which the felloes of its wheels were recorded as being 9" wide.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
BWsTrains

Posted (edited)

12 hours ago, Mikkel said:

Regarding the font, it is Bookman Old Style. I must emphasize that I do not know much about fonts, so beware. I tried to check and it seems that this font is OK for my Edwardian period, but am not 100% sure.

 

Let me know if you need some hints on spacing and resizing in Word, it is a bit clunky and the options are distributed over three different menus.

 

Thx Mikkel,

 

I'll have a look at Word, I know what you mean! I might bring this project forward a little given the nudge your build has given me.

 

Colin

Edited by BWsTrains
  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
phil_sutters

Posted (edited)

If you want a Union view on horses per vehicle - from one of my wife's ancestors. I find the presence of angels around carmen an interesting touch. 

Edward Webb carman certificate1895.jpg

Edited by phil_sutters
  • Like 8
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

 

Many thanks, also for that link - an enlightening read. I did not know about the Victorian colour explosion, it has made me see the pregrouping liveries in a new light. The "Decadent young woman" is superb, and I notice her yellow book!

 

 

 

Ah, very nice. Jonathan I think the Shirescenes version is your best bet if you are looking for one to go in a train (although it is currently sold out).

 

The Gem/John Day kit is so tall that I think it might be out of loading gauge, even with the roof boards folded down. So I clearly need another lower one if I am to fulfill the company's promises!

 

 

 

Thank you Nick, some very useful info there. The HMRS images sound like gold, very tempting!

 

Here are some shots with different numbers of horses, it seems to have varied with the needs an capacity:

 

van.JPG.f64813c2489cd8f39e999f64100a9cc2.JPG

 

jb-moving-services-pantechnicon.jpg.a15e02eabcf41b03303b2601506cd59e.jpg

 

   Udklip.JPG.79810f61f3e3c307abebe5bd04e27ffa.JPG

 

 

 

I was looking at the horses.  The one on the top does not seem very large, the second set I am not sure they are shires as they have no feathering on the legs, and I wondered if the last three were Suffolk Punches, as it is an Ipswich firm.  I googled Suffolk Punch and in the images this one turned up, so three Suffolk Punches.

 

I did start wondering about  traction engine pulling one at Traeth Mawr, but I have seen no photographs of them there, so if I wish to add to the chaos of Station Road it will have to be horse drawn, although I too have quite enough horse drawn vehicles.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
ChrisN

Posted (edited)

This Web Site could be useful for fonts.  I looked at it but all the fonts I have used have ended up being printed at 0.5mm so it really did not matter if they were accurate.  You can search for all sorts of things, eg., 1900s.

 

Someone else shared this which is why I have it, but cannot remember who, probably Mikkel.

Edited by ChrisN
  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
14 minutes ago, ChrisN said:

This Web Site could be useful for fonts.

 

Thanks, Chris - that's very useful. Having said that, care is needed as signwriting styles are not the same as print fonts, but there is presumably some correlation as styles change over time.

 

Nick.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
On 04/03/2024 at 07:35, Mikkel said:

I think the printed sides work particularly well if there is a natural "frame" around them to conceal the edges, as here where the van is paneled. 

I have switched to using inkjet-printable vinyl, as it is much thinner than paper so the edges are much less of a problem.

 

Regarding fonts, I find 'Garamond' is useful for 'period' lettering.

 

Mike

  • Informative/Useful 6
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Excellent modelling as usual Mikkel and good to see “Horse drawn weekly” is still going strong🙂

 

Best wishes

 

Dave

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

Thank you Dave, and welcome back. I was thinking of your "Horse drawn weekly" phrase while building this one, there's material for several issues across RMweb by now 🙂

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Some interesting info above, thanks gents. 

 

I was a bit confused to see this photo, as I thought the original furniture store at the Pantechnicon was long gone by this time. But apparently there was a Pantechnicon Ltd company that traded right up to the 1970s.

 

gettyimages-102729201-2048x2048.jpg.38baea5aafe1d9c13e247eb3a109a311.jpg

Source: Getty Images, embedding permitted.

 

  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, Mikkel said:

Thank you Dave, and welcome back. I was thinking of your "Horse drawn weekly" phrase while building this one, there's material for several issues across RMweb by now 🙂

 

Thanks Mikkel🙂

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

I did a Duncan Models pantechicon in 0 scale, and used it as a load on a LBSC machinery wagon, which is how it would go by rail. The wagon had a flat deck, not a well, and the pantechnicon was a tight fit inside the wagon. The poster boards above the roof have to be removed, the drivers seat folded down, and the pole at the front removed. If it is loaded dead central on the wagon, I found it is just within load gauge limits, nothing to spare.

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
29 minutes ago, Northroader said:

I did a Duncan Models pantechicon in 0 scale

 

I have one of those in the kit stash, with a Scorpio diagram G8 GWR implement truck to carry it. Your experience is a useful reminder to check the loading gauge clearances carefully.

 

Nick.

  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

On 08/03/2024 at 16:53, Northroader said:

I did a Duncan Models pantechicon in 0 scale, and used it as a load on a LBSC machinery wagon, which is how it would go by rail. The wagon had a flat deck, not a well, and the pantechnicon was a tight fit inside the wagon. The poster boards above the roof have to be removed, the drivers seat folded down, and the pole at the front removed. If it is loaded dead central on the wagon, I found it is just within load gauge limits, nothing to spare.

 

Your comment made me realize that the prototype photos I have seen of Pantechnicons all show them on flat wagons, not well wagons.

 

@magmouse, can you think of photos that shows them on well wagons? (I looked in the HMRS collection but only found photos of them on the ground, but probably my error).

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Photos showing pantechnicons loaded on wagons don’t seem to be all that common. The ones I have seen show them loaded on agricultural implement wagons, rather than well wagons (crocodiles, hydras and loriets, in GWR-speak). So, for example, the photo here:

 


And the glorious picture at the top of this page:

 

http://phils-pba-hstry.com/archer-cowley--co/archer-cowley--co-photo/archer-cowley--co-history/acco-containers-on-railway.html

 

As well of course as the LSWR example you posted, Mikkel.

 

I suspect most 4-wheel well wagons would be too short for a Pantechnicon, and you can’t end-load onto a Crocodile or similar.

 

Nick.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thank you very much, Nick. That Archer's photo is indeed quite a sight!

 

BTW, Paddington have been in touch, asking why on earth there has been no mention of the company's own Pantechnicons. Here is an 1894 specimen. Tempting subject for a scratchbuild.

 

20240310_150832.jpg.0cdf6268d71461ac218b8f007e28cc57.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Great photo. Interesting that the wheels are outside the body, without wheel arches. Presumably the body is narrower than the other types we have seen. 
 

Nick

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

It looks as if the upper body panels are stepped out above the wheels. This one looks as if it’s designed with rail transport in mind? Presumably those are securing chains hanging down, there are no placard boards above the roof to take down, and the front pole for the horse harness pushes back under the vehicle, rather than detaches. Suppose it’s painted chocolate? Pity the sign writing front or back doesn’t show.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Northroader said:

It looks as if the upper body panels are stepped out above the wheels.

 

Good spot - I hadn't noticed when looking on my phone yesterday, but you are right.

 

Nick.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

20240311_204125.jpg.39f04fc4780b4ddd8063bf0dcb2c6589.jpg

 

This is a later shot of the same vehicle, taken in 1920. Smaller wheels with thicker spokes have been fitted, and the sides are now straight.

 

There are a couple of drawings in Janet Russell's "Great Western Horsepower". She implies that the GWR made different types of these, but it is also possible that the drawings show the same van in  different configurations. The best drawing says 8 ft high (and a bit, not quite legible).

 

Tony Atkins GWR Goods cartage Vol 1 also has one of the drawings, although quite small.

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...