JSpencer Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I’m really hoping these or the Bullied coaches slip. es Was'nt that the Great Western? Hat coat, gone 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold adb968008 Posted January 19, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 19, 2019 I’m really hoping these or the Bullied coaches slip. Was'nt that the Great Western? Hat coat, gone I was thinking it was Bulleid Pacific’s that did the slipping. :-) joining you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted January 19, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 19, 2019 We have, thankfully, reached the era of the accurate, reliable rendition of prototypical railway models. All manufactures in this day and age can utilise a plethora of resources to ensure the finished product will satisfy that most critical of customer - us. Within a given price range, we can expect fine, exquisite details but, regardless of cost we demand consistent, reliable running every time. I have faith that the Rails and Hornby versions of Mr Stroudley's design will deliver and operate reliably and with visual harmony. When the dust has finally settled and the boxes have been stored away, it will be left to the models themselves to prove their worth. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted January 20, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 20, 2019 Any chance of a sensible decoder socket in this new version? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rising Standards Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 It depends what you define as sensible, but it's getting a 6-pin socket and that'll do nicely for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted January 22, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 22, 2019 It depends what you define as sensible, but it's getting a 6-pin socket and that'll do nicely for me. Thanks. That will be absolutely fine; no 8 pin socket to chop out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exet1095 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 At the Toyfair earlier. Lovely, with see-through frames and everything. Paul 9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pre Grouping fan Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 I need a lie down after seeing that.. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold NHY 581 Posted January 22, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 22, 2019 Roll on the LSWR versions I say.......... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium ianmaccormac Posted January 22, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Missing the tank front lining on Stepney, but otherwise looking good! Edited January 22, 2019 by ianmaccormac Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
County of Yorkshire Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Is there now genuinely still scope in the market for the Rails/Dapol version? If I were them, I'd be having a look at the sales forecasts and the R&D spend committed to date... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
9402 Fredrick Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 How close are these to being out now? I am curious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 At the Toyfair earlier. Lovely, with see-through frames and everything. Paul Nice to see them in physical form. I guess these are decorated samples, so not exactly as will be produced, but giving a very good impression. Note that Stepney sample has, for instance been assembled using a cab from a later version, as the hole in the front sheet for the vacuum exhaust pipe may be seen. I note two improvements on the previous images: (i) the SR green version now has the livery applied to the splasher, and (ii) wheels seem to be blackened, which is a great improvement. Otherwise I think the both the strengths and weaknesses noted earlier remain. The major issue for the A1X being the tank bolts and for the A1 the buffer lamp brackets, chimney and lubricators. The guard irons are still hideous and the coal rails on Rolvenden still wrong. A good solid effort, though. A good Terrier, but perhaps not a great one, and certainly not definitive. Room yet for Rails/Dapol to surprise us. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatthewCarty Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Edits to try and avoid duplication of posts and content Edited January 22, 2019 by MatthewCarty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatthewCarty Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) How close are these to being out now? I am curious. Some as early as March for some if the Hornby website is to be believed, suggests work was started along time before the Rails version (although difficult to understand why it seemed to be a late addition to this year's range if they were so advanced). However even if the March ones turn out to be a mistake, May isn't a long way off! R3767 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32655-era-4.html R3768 - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32636-era-5.html R3780 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/lb-scr-terrier-0-6-0t-655-stepney-era-2.html R3781 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/k-esr-terrier-0-6-0t-no-5-rolvenden-era-2.html R3782 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/se-cr-terrier-0-6-0t-751-era-2.html R3783 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/sr-terrier-0-6-0t-2662-era-3.html R3767X - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32655-era-4-ca7b01.html R3768X - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32636-era-5-b21f92.html R3780X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/lb-scr-terrier-0-6-0t-655-stepney-era-2-7b5ec8.html R3781X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/k-esr-terrier-0-6-0t-no-5-rolvenden-era-2-01709e.html R3782X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/se-cr-terrier-0-6-0t-751-era-2-e9a28d.html R3783X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/sr-terrier-0-6-0t-2662-era-3-89eefe.html Edited January 22, 2019 by MatthewCarty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Ian J. Posted January 22, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Overall they look far better than the old tooling, but, those nuts on the coupling rods really do look absurd, something I hope would not happen on the Rails version. Edited January 22, 2019 by Ian J. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenGiraffe22 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Ohhhh they look fab! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 Some as early as March for some if the Hornby website is to be believed, suggests work was started along time before the Rails version (although difficult to understand why it seemed to be a late addition to this year's range if they were so advanced). However even if the March ones turn out to be a mistake, May isn't a long way off! R3767 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32655-era-4.html R3768 - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32636-era-5.html R3780 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/lb-scr-terrier-0-6-0t-655-stepney-era-2.html R3781 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/k-esr-terrier-0-6-0t-no-5-rolvenden-era-2.html R3782 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/se-cr-terrier-0-6-0t-751-era-2.html R3783 - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/sr-terrier-0-6-0t-2662-era-3.html R3767X - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32655-era-4-ca7b01.html R3768X - March https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/br-terrier-0-6-0t-32636-era-5-b21f92.html R3780X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/lb-scr-terrier-0-6-0t-655-stepney-era-2-7b5ec8.html R3781X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/k-esr-terrier-0-6-0t-no-5-rolvenden-era-2-01709e.html R3782X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/se-cr-terrier-0-6-0t-751-era-2-e9a28d.html R3783X - May https://www.Hornby.com/uk-en/shop/locomotives/locomotives-by-class/a1x-terrier/sr-terrier-0-6-0t-2662-era-3-89eefe.html Hmm. Releasing the BR black versions first, one of which is the same as Rails/Dapols had announced, might be considered to be the way to hit Rails/Dapol sales hardest. I have always spoken up for struggling Hornby and its products, but I'm not sure I like what this Terrier ambush suggests about the people currently running the business. Nice little loco but with an unpleasant savour. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium uax6 Posted January 23, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2019 One question I have is this: How heavy are they? The old version is no-where near heavy enough for reliable pick-up, and unless this has been addressed I feel that these will still suffer from less than perfect running. And of course as they are so small there is very little space to get any extra ballast into them.... Andy G Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernard Lamb Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 Hmm. Releasing the BR black versions first, one of which is the same as Rails/Dapols had announced, might be considered to be the way to hit Rails/Dapol sales hardest. I have always spoken up for struggling Hornby and its products, but I'm not sure I like what this Terrier ambush suggests about the people currently running the business. Nice little loco but with an unpleasant savour. I see it as a very positive attitude. They are back to a belief at the top that Hornby should be the number one name in model trains. They are adopting an aggressive attitude to clearly let any competitors know that they mean business. The other side of the coin is that having taken this stance then they have to see it through. I think it is called Capitalism and I think it is the system by which we do business in the UK. Interesting times ahead. Bernard (Who on the evidence seen so far prefers the Rails/Dapol version) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Legend Posted January 23, 2019 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2019 Hmm. Releasing the BR black versions first, one of which is the same as Rails/Dapols had announced, might be considered to be the way to hit Rails/Dapol sales hardest. I have always spoken up for struggling Hornby and its products, but I'm not sure I like what this Terrier ambush suggests about the people currently running the business. Nice little loco but with an unpleasant savour. Reading too much into that I suspect. Could it be it makes sense to produce the BR Black ones first and then proceed to the more complicated liveries ? In any case its Chinese New Year coming up . If they are not on a boat now I suspect that March will not be met . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 Reading too much into that I suspect. Could it be it makes sense to produce the BR Black ones first and then proceed to the more complicated liveries ? In any case its Chinese New Year coming up . If they are not on a boat now I suspect that March will not be met . Generally one might expect to sell as many BR black versions as all others combined. That in itself is a reason for going with these first, so perhaps that decision isn't directly related to the intention to spike a retail commissioner's guns. The release generally and the way Hornby have sought to ambush Rails/Dapol clearly is intentionally aggressive, however, and I don't think such tactics are Big, Clever or Good for the Hobby. So I stand by the rather sour taste in the mouth this announcement leaves. I have always supported the Hornby brand and its products on RMWeb, even if I have had concerns about some of its antics, and I am disappointed that it has chosen this way to go. Still, there are consequences to what might have been thought a "cheap win", one of which will be the eventual comparison between the models and I think Rails/Dapol is still in with a shot here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold MikeParkin65 Posted January 23, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2019 (edited) Generally one might expect to sell as many BR black versions as all others combined. That in itself is a reason for going with these first, so perhaps that decision isn't directly related to the intention to spike a retail commissioner's guns. The release generally and the way Hornby have sought to ambush Rails/Dapol clearly is intentionally aggressive, however, and I don't think such tactics are Big, Clever or Good for the Hobby. So I stand by the rather sour taste in the mouth this announcement leaves. I have always supported the Hornby brand and its products on RMWeb, even if I have had concerns about some of its antics, and I am disappointed that it has chosen this way to go. Still, there are consequences to what might have been thought a "cheap win", one of which will be the eventual comparison between the models and I think Rails/Dapol is still in with a shot here. How do we know Rails didn't ambush Hornby in the first place (maybe taking advantage of their apparently weak financial position and obvious supply problems)? To have their model this advanced already implies Hornby have been working on the Terrier for a considerable time before its announcement . Edited January 23, 2019 by MikeParkin65 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted January 23, 2019 Share Posted January 23, 2019 How do we know Rails didn't ambush Hornby in the first place (maybe taking advantage of their apparently weak financial position and obvious supply problems)? To have their model this advanced already implies Hornby have been working on the Terrier for a considerable time before its announcement . I think the smiling Mr Kohler speaking of surprises gives you the answer to that, besides Rails announced this near the start of their process, Hornby near the end of theirs. Retailers need a constant supply of new product. For various reasons, both Red Box and Blue Box have struggled to keep up. Retailers need to fill the void so you can hardly blame them for turning to commissions. To hit back with a duplicate product is not, in my view,the best response by Hornby, but, hey, believe what you want. I was disappointed to see these tactics, but, point made, I think the focus should return to the model. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold Right Away Posted January 23, 2019 RMweb Gold Share Posted January 23, 2019 (edited) Whether or not there has been some inter rivalry shenanigans, the old Hornby Terrier could possibly have given the manufacturer a head start with the new tooling, hence the lower price. Southern modellers in recent years have been quite fortunate in the small engine area. Perhaps Hornby might have considered a completely new venture, maybe a D tank, C2X or a K mogul (but the latter would possibly be a logical step forward for Bachmann following on from their Atlantics.) Whatever, duplicated models can appear to be a somewhat lost opportunity for sales and a little frustrating for modellers eager to see what new projects are on the horizon. Edited January 23, 2019 by Right Away Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now