Jump to content
 

Charlie Strong Metals (and Watery Lane Sidings)


Recommended Posts

This is the one I need for my current layout:

image.png.75c66b9969c54c8b95ec13ddf888ff29.png

 

This is the one I fancy as the centrepiece of a future layout. I’d probably have to make it work somehow. The practicality of lowering containers in stacks or onto wagons would be tricky though. 

craning-containers_1970.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you given thought to the old Airfix Throneycroft/Coles motor crane?  The kit that is paired with the Bedford/Queen Mary trailer combo?   That kit can be built into a surprisingly nice model.   All the shapes are right.   The detail is mostly lacking.   Listed as 1/76, as well.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AlfaZagato said:

Have you given thought to the old Airfix Throneycroft/Coles motor crane?  The kit that is paired with the Bedford/Queen Mary trailer combo?   That kit can be built into a surprisingly nice model.   All the shapes are right.   The detail is mostly lacking.   Listed as 1/76, as well.


Agreed, though it’s a rather bigger crane and I think(?) the OP works in 7mm scale.

 

The rest of that set is more problematic - the Bedford tractor measures out as spot on. For H0. I’m not sure about the trailer.

 

Adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another view of the big Scotch Derrick that was at Manchester Docks 8 Pier from around 1965 to 1985. This is a later shot when the area was pretty much abandoned.

Photo by Philip Royle and it was posted on the MSC Facebook page recently, but also features in one of his two excellent photo album books of MSC photos. 

259461320_10224362573365325_7035925803074709252_n.jpg.31b5048a42110741c9ff932b06c735a3.jpg

Although there aren't actually any railway trucks under the outriggers, they are certainly high enough for that to be possible, and I expect the idea was that road vehicles loaded with containers could drive underneath them. That would help to explain the stripy bollards protecting the support towers.

Note that there is also a stand for the end of the jib to rest on.

 

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose at this point, you already have a plan.    If you're still considering, why not have a Scotch Derrick at the fore of the layout?   If you have it positioned right, you could imply more yard 'off the table.'   Then you'd have you're derrick in full itself, while only modelling 1/3 of the space it works.

 

Admittedly, this plan leads to a tall, awkward set of objects at the front of your layout.   I think any notable crane will be adverse to access, though.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mol_PMB said:

Superb! Make it so...

(If it were me, I'd be thinking a custom etch)

I would but am unable to design such a thing, so I'll have to make it my more basic methods and from plastic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mol_PMB said:

I may be able to help if that would be useful...

Thanks. I'll have to see how I get on and come up with an actual overall design. It really could do with being nearer to the track for appearance sake. The only way to do this would be to have the leg that is at the near end of the building going into the building. I suppose this could be feasible. The building and crane could have been built at the same time and the building could have been almost built around the leg and the leg anchored to the floor, or a large block, somewhere inside. I can put another, perhaps even older, building at this end to give a reason for having to put the leg inside the new building. The idea behind this area of the yard, and the building, is that it was some sort of engineering works that closed and was bought by Charlie Strong, who uses the building as an office/store/workshop. The derrick was recommissioned and an electromagnet fitted to load scrap into railway wagons.

 

From where it is currently placed, the jib isn't really long enough so I need to increase it by about 30mm. It appears that a lot of these things have a jib of much greater length than the legs, or height of the mast.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a go at making part of the jib by pantograph milling 20 thou cartridge brass. I missed a cross piece that goes at 90 degrees to the main rails off the pattern, so that needs to be modified. It's gone a little wobbly in places but this one was just a test piece to see if it was at all possible. I have never attempted to make anything so fine before. I usually make patterns to 4:1 but the size of the finished piece meant 2:1 was as big as I could go. I even had to turn down the end of an old stylus and use it without a bobbin because I don't have one for 2:1 and have never even set the machine to that ratio before. I suppose you could say it's all a bit experimental.

DSCF8586.JPG.ed58016397139d9b03278c4d73d39e4e.JPG

I need to make a pattern for the top and bottom parts of the jib, and one more pattern for the legs. All 8 pieces of the legs will be identical, so only one pattern is required. There will also be a pattern to make for the mast.

 

I'll probably mill the legs from plasticard as it's far quicker to mill and easier to assemble. It's not as if the legs will actually support anything on the model. In fact I may make the entire thing from plasticard. Once the legs and jib are assembled they should be strong enough as it's not going to be a working model.

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 5
  • Craftsmanship/clever 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/01/2022 at 16:02, Enterprisingwestern said:

 

 

Personally I can't see a Scotch Derek lifting much!

 

Mike.

Jesus Christ! Are they the Scots version of Village People? :D No, don't even answer that. Let's just try to pretend that wasn't posted on my thread.

 

Right...

 

I've studied a few more photos and there were two basic problems with the card mock-up.

It was too big - the backlegs were almost as large as the jib, which isn't the case in most prototypes.

The backlegs and mast/racewheel base should be connected in a triangle at ground level, or at the top of any bases that the derrick is mounted on. The latter was impossible with the original position of the bases, one being round the side of the building from the other, and one being on the opposite side of the railway track, unless the bases were higher than anything that would pass under the connecting part (sleeper).

 

The square, placed on the baseboard, shows the positions that the bases of the backlegs and mast will now assume. I have made one backleg and the jib. Both are 30 thou. Plastikard.

DSCF8588.JPG.43b9faa74c3a2121b087f40d04142df7.JPG

 

 

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 5
  • Craftsmanship/clever 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ruston said:

It was too big - the backlegs were almost as large as the jib, which isn't the case in most prototypes.

The backlegs and mast/racewheel base should be connected in a triangle at ground level, or at the top of any bases that the derrick is mounted on

  something like this :

Pond Quarry on part of the Brookes Ltd system at Lightcliffe

 

800585639_xingHxRd4.jpg.9e6fdf18a0a899d7227d7392d73e5c04.jpg

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have gone for a Coles, or a 22RB. This thing takes up a lot of space!

DSCF8589.JPG.5d8de1ebbdadee91a171e0f7893934a6.JPG

I've set it out as an equilateral triangle. I don't have a plan view of one of these things but it seemed to make sense to have each leg of the base being the same length. With the backlegs set up, and the racewheel/slewing ring in place, I can now take the final measurement to allow for the mast to be built.

Edited by Ruston
  • Like 13
  • Craftsmanship/clever 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...