Jump to content
 

Building kits for Tyneside in the BR era. J24 and PDK D49/2


rowanj
 Share

Recommended Posts

Is the cab front fixed? as it appears to be buckled at the base, hence the large gap between it and the firebox.

 

Is this a secondhand kit, as there appears to be a huge number of detail parts missing ?

 

Re the Tender there appears to be a lot of solder "blobs" where the Tank meets the Footplate ? A needle file will clean them up nicely before a top coat .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the cab front fixed? as it appears to be buckled at the base, hence the large gap between it and the firebox.

 

Is this a secondhand kit, as there appears to be a huge number of detail parts missing ?

 

Re the Tender there appears to be a lot of solder "blobs" where the Tank meets the Footplate ? A needle file will clean them up nicely before a top coat .

 

Believe it or not, there is an art to building these things imperfectly - the full-size things didn't always look perfect when in service, and there were dents, bulging sheet metal, bent footplates and steps and so on. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the cab front fixed? as it appears to be buckled at the base, hence the large gap between it and the firebox.

 

Is this a secondhand kit, as there appears to be a huge number of detail parts missing ?

 

Re the Tender there appears to be a lot of solder "blobs" where the Tank meets the Footplate ? A needle file will clean them up nicely before a top coat .

Good afternoon, Mick - always good to hear from you.

 

The gap is simply a result of the firebox lying loosely on the footplate. When fitted to the firebox and held by the bolt through the saddle, the gap disappears and, miraculously, the footplate, boiler and cab stay parallel. I don't see a buckle in real life....

 

The kit was new direct from LRM. I think "missing" parts are simply a case of age and higher expectations raised by the like of North Eastern Kits. I know others have criticised this and the J21 kit, and I understand it was not designed by George Norton, but rather "inherited" by him. There are, in fact, quite a lot of detailed etch parts .dotted around the 3 frets but they sometimes took a bit of tracking down, at least by me. I wanted to try to fill the cab which otherwise would look a bit bare, and prefer a plasticard cab floor to avoid shorts - there is an etch but it would require metal removed to clear the wheels and scribed to represent the wooden floor.

 

Solder blobs --yes, there are a few which will be tackled by the usual needle file, scraper ,fibreglass pencil methods. I suspect I keep fibreglass pencil refill manufacturers in business singlehandedly...

 

John

Edited by rowanj
Link to post
Share on other sites

When fitted to the firebox and held by the bolt through the saddle, the gap disappears and, miraculously, the footplate, boiler and cab stay parallel. I don't see a buckle in real life....

 

Honest - but I'm not convinced by the curve on the rear of the cab roof. Why do things that look ok in the flesh seem odd on a digital photo?

post-1659-0-57895100-1514397068_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mike, that is a useful photo.

 

Another addition not supplied in the kit, though easily fabricated, is the reinforcing bar where the firebox meets the footplate, On the RH side of the firebox, there seems to be some pipework emerging from the cab to a point near the rear washout plug. It is small points like this  which add to the pleasure of building these kits.

 

Today has seen a bit of work on the boiler. The outer layer of the smokebox has been fitted, along with handrails. I'm not totally convinced by the chimney and dome, even though they are lovely brass castings .I have a whitemetal Dave Alexander set which look more like the photos I have, including 65967 which is my chosen loco.

 

This loco will have the later 69A boiler, with the dome moved back towards the cab. I expected to have to mark all the points to drill the holes for the dome, Ross Pop valves and whistle, trying to keep them all in a line and central to the boiler. However , when drilling the etched marks which show the location of the handrail knobs, I happened to look under the boiler and noticed similar etched marks for the dome - both 69 and 69A positions, and safety valves.  That makes life much easier

Link to post
Share on other sites

The boiler is fixed to the footplate at the saddle, but not yet at the cab.The loco is held at the 3-way splitting distant at what will become Little Benton North, but is able to proceed, I'm glad to say, either West towards Benton and Newcastle, East to Backworth then either North to Ashington or down the coast to Tynemouth, or straight ahead up the ECML towards Edinburgh.

 

There is a short at the front live driving wheel, and an occasional spark on a wheel at the tender, Neither seem critical, and I'll bolt the loco and tender chassis to the respective footplates and test again .However the loco and tender ran both forward and backward through the pointwork in the fiddle yard without either stalling or de-railing, so all looks as though it will be well.

 

There are no sandpipes in the kit, but these are prominent on Mike's photo above, so these will be fitted. Pity I'd painted the chassis....

 

I'm much happier with the Dave Alexander chimney and dome than with those supplied in the kit.

 

 

 

post-1659-0-00598700-1514563265_thumb.jpg

post-1659-0-31194700-1514563276_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

It may be the photo but the firebox profiling doesn't look exactly right. The two sides of the firebox should be parallel to each other and perpendicular to the footplate, at the lower extremities of the firebox wrapper.

 

At what point, in the build sequence, do the instructions suggest fitting the front and middle pairs of splashers?

 

With the chimney and dome, it really is well worth the time to get the seating as tight on the boiler and smokebox top as possible.

 

Cheers

 

Mike

Edited by mikemeg
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike.

 

At the point at which the photo was taken, the boiler was attached to the footplate only by a bolt through the smokebox saddle. In the meantime, I have tweaked the firebox as you said,and as shown in the photo you posted of the prototype.

 

The order of assembly is . footplate,cab,splashers,boiler.Actually, splashers and boiler are done in sync,using the bolted boiler to check positions for the splashers.

 

I agree about the chimney and dome. At the moment, they are just perched on the boiler, but I like to see them there because it starts to look like a complete loco, even though there is still a fair bit of detailing to do.

 

Cheers and good wishes for 2018

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

Another photo of a J25; this time showing the right hand side. This loco would have been pretty similar to your model, being 65695 against your 65697. They would both have been built at Darlington and both would have had the 'piano' valve chest cover and, by the early 1950's, the 69a boiler with the re-sited dome and one less boiler bands.

 

This photo clearly shows the profile of the front guard irons, the NER tapered buffers (packed out from the buffer beam to accommodate the LNER draw gear) and the profile of the front sand pipes as well as all sorts of other details.

 

Cheers

 

Mike

post-3150-0-80473300-1514903287_thumb.jpg

Edited by mikemeg
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ready for a final rub-down before the first coat of primer. The chimney is not seated correctly and will be attended to. Still some work to do on the chassis. the loco runs well, and the boiler has been packed with lead and tested on a 16 wagon pick-up goods and looked the part under the "2-foot rule" as it emerged from under the bridge onto the limited scenic section of the layout.

 

I'll post the final photos once painting is completed - Railmatch weathered Black- and Archers Rivet transfers have been applied to the smokebox and the cab. 

post-1659-0-73200900-1514927969_thumb.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

Another photo of a J25; this time showing the right hand side. This loco would have been pretty similar to your model, being 65695 against your 65697. They would both have been built at Darlington and both would have had the 'piano' valve chest cover and, by the early 1950's, the 69a boiler with the re-sited dome and one less boiler bands.

 

This photo clearly shows the profile of the front guard irons, the NER tapered buffers (packed out from the buffer beam to accommodate the LNER draw gear) and the profile of the front sand pipes as well as all sorts of other details.

 

Cheers

 

Mike

Hello Mike,

John's thread has encouraged me to make a start on my own LRM J25. Many years in the waiting.

Your 2 photographs have already proved useful.

There are buffer collars provided with the kit bolts.

From your photographs you can see that 65693 has 4 bolts on each buffer collar.

However, 65695 has 4 bolts on one and 8 on the other.

Obviously things could change after maintenance but it is likely to influence my decision on prototype or will encourage me to check if I go for another loco.

Thanks,

Bob 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Mike,

John's thread has encouraged me to make a start on my own LRM J25. Many years in the waiting.

Your 2 photographs have already proved useful.

There are buffer collars provided with the kit bolts.

From your photographs you can see that 65693 has 4 bolts on each buffer collar.

However, 65695 has 4 bolts on one and 8 on the other.

Obviously things could change after maintenance but it is likely to influence my decision on prototype or will encourage me to check if I go for another loco.

Thanks,

Bob 

 

Bob

 

I'm sure you will enjoy building the kit. I have a request in to LRM for a N8/9.

 

When I finish the paintwork, I'll try to make a short list of what I added to the J25. One thing to note now is that the Slaters buffers, though perfectly fine in themselves, have squared shoulders, so I used a set of whitemetal ones from the spares box, I believe Markits do a more accurate set.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob

 

I'm sure you will enjoy building the kit. I have a request in to LRM for a N8/9.

 

When I finish the paintwork, I'll try to make a short list of what I added to the J25. One thing to note now is that the Slaters buffers, though perfectly fine in themselves, have squared shoulders, so I used a set of whitemetal ones from the spares box, I believe Markits do a more accurate set.

 

John

John, 

Are you saying that buffers do not come with the kit?

I've had a look and there are no buffers in mine so I'll have to buy some.

It isn't unusual for me to take parts from one kit and use it on another so I'm not sure that the shortage is down to me.

If LRM don't supply buffers that is certainly a bit off.

Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

Are you saying that buffers do not come with the kit?

I've had a look and there are no buffers in mine so I'll have to buy some.

It isn't unusual for me to take parts from one kit and use it on another so I'm not sure that the shortage is down to me.

If LRM don't supply buffers that is certainly a bit off.

Bob

Interesting you say that. In my two D2 kits there are no buffers included. I'm going to give John a call and ask him, as it does say in the instructions there should be some. It's not a deal breaker but it would be good to have some if they are available.

 

Edit: I like Alan Gibson buffers for smaller LNER buffers and Markits for Pacific buffers.

Edited by grob1234
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting you say that. In my two D2 kits there are no buffers included. I'm going to give John a call and ask him, as it does say in the instructions there should be some. It's not a deal breaker but it would be good to have some if they are available.

 

Edit: I like Alan Gibson buffers for smaller LNER buffers and Markits for Pacific buffers.

I've just ordered a set of Gibson buffers (via Wizard Models). I looked at the Markit's site and it looks as if they don't do NER tapered buffers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me if the Alan Gibson NER tapered loco buffers have the bolted collars as an integral part of the casting/turning (whatever is the process)?

 

If so, I won't need to attach the etched collars included with the LRM kit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me if the Alan Gibson NER tapered loco buffers have the bolted collars as an integral part of the casting/turning (whatever is the process)?

 

If so, I won't need to attach the etched collars included with the LRM kit. 

 

These are Gibson NER tapered buffers, so looks like you'll need the collars. HTH.

 

post-23638-0-32354500-1515075830_thumb.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert on GN locos but shouldn't it have parallel ones?

 

Good spot.

 

Most of them do, but the J3 class had a mixture of parallel and tapered, this locomotive having the latter. I even have photographic evidence to prove it :) (unusal for me as I usually build first and ask questions later!)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...