Jump to content
 

East Coast Mainline Blockade for Werrington Junction diveunder


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
45 minutes ago, corneliuslundie said:

I often wonder how the GNR would have managed a project like this.

 

Jonathan

Dive unders didn't seem particularly popular, apart from in very restricted layouts, so I would guess a flyover instead.

 

Edited by melmerby
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
59 minutes ago, corneliuslundie said:

I often wonder how the GNR would have managed a project like this.

 

4 blokes in trousers, waistcoat and jacket, 2 wheelbarrows and shovels and a lot of beer, bread and cheese. ......I'd say 4 days tops..:D

  • Funny 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Possessions tended to be much shorter and there is a photo of a new bridge being connected at Lancaster Green Ayre in 1911 which entailed moving a double junction. There are about 50 workmen in the photo. I'm not sure about the copyright but hope it is of interest for illustrative purposes only.

 

1486117328_GreenAyreStation1.jpg.d5069d16ec6bc3422d1203404c654c5e.jpgThe tracks in the foreground are those onto the new bridge that had been constructed parallel to the old bridge. You can just see the start of the previous bridge in the lower left of the photo. the signal box had been moved about 20 yards a month previously. The OHLE structures were put in place in 1908 but the new bridge was already planned so you can see a temporary bracket bolted to the left hand end of the gantry that supported the wires over the old bridge. 

 

As an aside, this photo has given me all sorts of detail information for my model of the station.

 

Jamie

  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot remember if I have posted this before.  I only have vague memories of the works, well it was 61 years ago:scared:

From the article what struck me was that the speed restriction of the junction was increased to 55mph running on to the Joint Line whereas the existing junction today has a limit of 40mph, progress?

 

1539352379_werringtonjunction19591.jpg.2a60644ebce35aa50edad1fe3543cb7a.jpg

1863983006_werringtonjunction19592.jpg.405f1eeb8537fc3796dbb06259f6fff6.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, jamie92208 said:

Possessions tended to be much shorter and there is a photo of a new bridge being connected at Lancaster Green Ayre in 1911 which entailed moving a double junction. There are about 50 workmen in the photo. I'm not sure about the copyright but hope it is of interest for illustrative purposes only.

 

1486117328_GreenAyreStation1.jpg.d5069d16ec6bc3422d1203404c654c5e.jpgThe tracks in the foreground are those onto the new bridge that had been constructed parallel to the old bridge. You can just see the start of the previous bridge in the lower left of the photo. the signal box had been moved about 20 yards a month previously. The OHLE structures were put in place in 1908 but the new bridge was already planned so you can see a temporary bracket bolted to the left hand end of the gantry that supported the wires over the old bridge. 

 

As an aside, this photo has given me all sorts of detail information for my model of the station.

 

Jamie

I notice just one guy in the small group to the right appears to be not wearing head protection (cloth cap)!:jester:

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
20 minutes ago, Donington Road said:

I cannot remember if I have posted this before.  I only have vague memories of the works, well it was 61 years ago:scared:

From the article what struck me was that the speed restriction of the junction was increased to 55mph running on to the Joint Line whereas the existing junction today has a limit of 40mph, progress?

 

1539352379_werringtonjunction19591.jpg.2a60644ebce35aa50edad1fe3543cb7a.jpg

1863983006_werringtonjunction19592.jpg.405f1eeb8537fc3796dbb06259f6fff6.jpg

I think you have posted it before but a second view is worth a look.

 

What they call "poor alignment " of the junction to the Spalding line, looks much better than today's zig-zag ladder.

  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, melmerby said:

I notice just one guy in the small group to the right appears to be not wearing head protection (cloth cap)!:jester:

 

Mandatory head gear is not applicable to those of a certain religious persuasion.  Although I am unsure if colour co-ordination is.:jester:

 

1244453194_2020-0758a.jpg.6e615b831a8b60555263f13dfaacc06e.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

There was an article in Rail Engineer about the project. IIRCthe jacks will push against what you see in the picture. Presumably there will be anchorages then the jacks will do their stuff then move up and repeat.

 

Jamie

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The large heap of ballast has gone, but where?

There has been weekend working at Glinton Junction on the cross over, but cannot see any new ballast.

 

IMG_6222.jpg.94067defe34838adc8a3b837db1630bb.jpg

 

IMG_6214.jpg.f8e58ff4cb351d5b05dcd16400c2b4fe.jpg

 

IMG_6220.jpg.11963c592ad568926775e1116d08df38.jpg

 

New ballast that was brought in last week.

IMG_6221.jpg.b2c3ce4c10a377853a02b9ed0ee3c0fd.jpg

 

Work continues with assembling rebar on Lincoln Road bridge to produce higher side walls in the centre.

IMG_6223.jpg.038b296d1d179a884e5e9175233031b1.jpg

 

IMG_6224.jpg.1505bd0d5a81dc6e00a98fea6211f5ce.jpg

 

At Hurn Road the ramp is being steadily shaped form the A15 road bridge towards the dive under.  Lot of water about which is quite normal in this very clay orientated area.

IMG_6227.jpg.8c75593166f2c19e1629b9f0701e0029.jpg

 

350157366_IMG_6233_stitchc.jpg.44b27a4fc6e1cc885a35d0d53cc71ee8.jpg

 

IMG_6239w.jpg.49dec730cd61265afe45a0f44ec83e79.jpg

 

IMG_6246.jpg.03f73dfce98c6925451884295edcc89f.jpg

 

IMG_6250.jpg.0244faf015ed21184dd0eb8f516791b2.jpg

 

IMG_6254.jpg.81a17aa7c4fbe26ef649b9599e553e94.jpg

 

IMG_6266.jpg.a7015b666429b972c08c24c42f0584f8.jpg

 

IMG_6263.jpg.52bf0cd8b68189224ad224500101e4b2.jpg

 

  • Like 10
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, 40F S & T said:

Hi  To get that to move is one thing but to go 100 yards is another.  Where are the jacks going to be and what is at the back of the jacks also how is it moved 100 yards?

 

22 hours ago, jamie92208 said:

There was an article in Rail Engineer about the project. IIRCthe jacks will push against what you see in the picture. Presumably there will be anchorages then the jacks will do their stuff then move up and repeat.

 

Jamie

 

Here is the link https://www.newcivilengineer.com/the-future-of/future-of-rail-curved-box-jack-takes-out-east-coast-main-line-junction-19-02-2020/

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

An appropriate person to involve in part of the job:

(excerpt from the item linked to by Mick)

"Mott MacDonald worked with Preene Groundwater Consulting and WJ Groundwater to design the dewatering system which features 300 wells, which were constructed by Stuart Wells.":D

  • Funny 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40F S & T said:

Hi Mick    Many thanks for the information.  I hope they are right it look very big item to move

Thanks again also thanks to everyone for the videos, photos & information. What will we do when it's finished?

Barrie

 

The box is not going in straight line, so that's half the problem solved :good:

When it's all finished we'll play trains :crazy:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

"What will we do when it's finished?"

I think the three main contributors should get together and produce a book, the definitive work on the project.

Jonathan

PS The only problem might be that most of those of interested have been following this thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 hours ago, melmerby said:

An appropriate person to involve in part of the job:

(excerpt from the item linked to by Mick)

"Mott MacDonald worked with Preene Groundwater Consulting and WJ Groundwater to design the dewatering system which features 300 wells, which were constructed by Stuart Wells.":D

To rather quell the levity, Stuart are a company that specialises in groundwater services including constructing wells

https://www.stuartwells.co.uk/

If i had put that it wouldn't have semed funny.:yes:

Edited by melmerby
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
17 hours ago, Donington Road said:

The large heap of ballast has gone, but where?

There has been weekend working at Glinton Junction on the cross over, but cannot see any new ballast.

 

IMG_6222.jpg.94067defe34838adc8a3b837db1630bb.jpg

 

Right, turn your pockets out!

 

We'll be watching Ebay for the auctions for 7mm, 4mm and 2mm ballast at cheap prices :D

  • Funny 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...