Del Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) While digging around in a second-hand shop, I came across an old 0-4-0T, which looked like it might make a nice characterful light railway goods loco. There was no guarantee that it worked, but for a fiver, I thought I'd take a punt. Well, it does work, and a little bit of research tells me it's a Triang 'Nellie', very loosely based on a LSWR C14. I don't want it to be a C14, just a better-looking 0-4-0T. The plan is to rewheel it, possibly remotor it, new buffers, some proper handrails, a proper bunker, get rid of that odd front 'shield' around the base of the smokebox, maybe remove the toolbox on the footplate. However, a brief excursion around the Internet seems to suggest that rewheeling for Code 100 is not a simple task, with talk of specific Romford wheels and axles required, and I was wondering if there are any other RTR chassis that might fit under it, like the Hornby 0-4-0 ('Smokey Joe', 101 etc) or the Pug? Edited October 14, 2016 by Del Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Isn't it OK on Cade 100 with its original wheels? K Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG John Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Someone has put it on an 0-6-0 chassis. I think you'll find it somewhere on RMweb. I've got one in my box of stuff to convert to O-16.5, but haven't decided what to do with it yet, although the wheels will probably go, either in the lathe or the bin! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayfield Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 You could buy a set of Romford/Markit wheels and the correct axles. The MRRC 5 pole motor is a good drop in replacement, but you will have to obtain one second hand, though I think Southeastern Finecast used to do a conversion bracket tor the Anchorage motors. I bought one (Nellie) off eBay which had a P4 conversion done to it !! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardTPM Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Since System 6 track (from 1970) was code 100 and the Nellie locos were in production until the late 1970s any of the later Tri-ang-Hornby/Hornby wheelsets used on them must have been compatible with the track as it was used in the train sets. It may be that the early examples which didn't have see-through spokes, might have had coarser treads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJS1977 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 My father's layout has two Nellies (not end of run ones either, they have X04 motors) on it which AFAIK have not been rewheeled and run fine on Code 100 Streamline track. As do a various other locos (the 1956 Princess has been rewheeled, but I think that's the only one). Rolling stock though, is another story! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 All the Nellies will run on code 100 track, but they might not like Peco code 100 points if the back to back is too tight. The wheels need easing out a fraction to work without a bump on the frog. The steel rimmed wheels will convert easily in a lathe to fine scale EM or P4, just move the tyre outwards in a press and re-machine the flange, and face the tyre front. The body will tidy up easily, with extra detailing as far as you want, The Xo4 motor should be OK they can be serviced in minutes, or if missing use a Chinese can motor from Ebay, with a brass sleeve to take the worm on to the metric shaft. Most small can motors will fit with a home made bracket. They make a useful industrial or light railway engine. Stephen 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 The easing of the back to back is easy, just hold the chassis in your hand and tap the axle centre with a punch till it moves a bit out. The back to back measurement should be about 14.3 to 14.4. in theory 14.5, but at 14.5 the overall width might foul the body, check and see, and if all clear, then use 14,5, but be prepared to experiment a bit, There is no need to rush to buy the replacement wheels, it is only appearance that would be improved, Stephen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del Posted October 14, 2016 Author Share Posted October 14, 2016 Thanks for the wheel advice. I only checked that it ran by a controller onto the pickups, so haven't actually put it on track yet. Going by my ancient Triang Jinty's struggles I had assumed that this would be similar, but looks like I might be OK. It's a green one, numbered 27. Any idea how old it's likely to be? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Alex TM Posted October 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 14, 2016 Hi folks, I have had a couple of those over the years, and they ran fine on the range if 00 track types that I had. Fitted wire handrails and crew. Repainted, too, but nothing inspiring on that part. As for alternate chassis types, I've seen them fitted onto the 'Smokey Joe'/Caley Pug type and, I'm sure, a Terrier too! Just go and have some fun with it. Regards, Alex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 If anybody wants a P4 Polly, then the supplied wheels are perfect, you don't even need to alter the back to back of the centres, just push out the tyre in a vice or press, or tap it out, then thin the flange to scale, and trim the outer tyre back to the casting, Very easy conversion, I did one in the 1960's to test out P4 track design. There are however some early Pollys with solid wheels, these will run on 00 track onyl, but can be eased out a tiny bit for Peco points Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Also general advice, the X04 motor is near indestructible, unless burnt out, and even then can have a new armature, There is nothing in it that you cannot service, exchange, make or bodge to keep them running, The key is lubrication, heavy oil on the bearings every so often, and occasional new carbon tips on the brush arms. By the time they need this they would have run hundreds of hours. If you you have access to a lathe then skim the commutator and pole faces, balance the armature and pop in ball races,,,,,,you will not find a better motor design, all the troubles come from wear and tear due to no servicing, no oil, or physical damage due to drops and bangs, Stephen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Moxy Posted October 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 14, 2016 Someone has put it on an 0-6-0 chassis. I think you'll find it somewhere on RMweb. I think this is the conversion John means http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/82968-niles-mostly-freelance-bodging-bench-coach-wagon-bodging/?p=1763373 I have also seen a conversion described somewhere (which I can't now find) using the 'Smokey Joe' chassis, which since that is made of plastic is fairly easy to shorten. You will still have to lose the front steps from the Nellie body to fit over the cylinders. HTH Moxy 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium New Haven Neil Posted October 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 14, 2016 I am aware of at least three different wheel types on these locos, the green 27 will have the middle version, with a sort of black finish, the odd late one did have the silver tyred wheels usually found on the blue or bright red ones with the Lord of the Isles dome. I'm a Nellie geek....I have a cupboard full of them, trying to get all the variations! The early solid wheeled ones won't run on code 100. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium jessy1692 Posted October 14, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted October 14, 2016 If you can find a cheap terrier chassis the body looks good on it, iv got one in a cupboard sonewhere. Makes a nice little model Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
28XX Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I cut the body through, stretched it by about 12mm, cut the cab back off, fitted a firebox backplate and a pair of Dublo trailing wheels. Painted it beige. Fun and funky. 0-4-2 ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG John Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I cut the body through, stretched it by about 12mm, cut the cab back off, fitted a firebox backplate and a pair of Dublo trailing wheels. Painted it beige. Fun and funky. 0-4-2 ! Photo? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJS1977 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Also general advice, the X04 motor is near indestructible, unless burnt out, and even then can have a new armature, There is nothing in it that you cannot service, exchange, make or bodge to keep them running, The key is lubrication, heavy oil on the bearings every so often, and occasional new carbon tips on the brush arms. By the time they need this they would have run hundreds of hours. If you you have access to a lathe then skim the commutator and pole faces, balance the armature and pop in ball races,,,,,,you will not find a better motor design, all the troubles come from wear and tear due to no servicing, no oil, or physical damage due to drops and bangs, Stephen Originally designed to be fitted to reconaissance cameras on Spitfires! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJS1977 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I cut the body through, stretched it by about 12mm, cut the cab back off, fitted a firebox backplate and a pair of Dublo trailing wheels. Painted it beige. Fun and funky. 0-4-2 ! I cut and shut two bodies onto a Bachmann 03 chassis for a passable representation of an ex-Cambrian (Tanat Valley) 0-6-0T. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyman7 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Since System 6 track (from 1970) was code 100 and the Nellie locos were in production until the late 1970s any of the later Tri-ang-Hornby/Hornby wheelsets used on them must have been compatible with the track as it was used in the train sets. It may be that the early examples which didn't have see-through spokes, might have had coarser treads. Triang models were made code 100 compatible from around 1963 so that they could be run on HD 2-rail track. The systems were formally merged in 1965. The standard loco wheelsets exist in coarse and finer flanged versions whilst 1963 marked the move from split-axle to pinpoint axle wheelsets for most rolling stock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardTPM Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 It's a green one, numbered 27. Any idea how old it's likely to be? Early 1970s, so at the time System 6 code 100 track was introduced. It should have see though, blackened wheels. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nearholmer Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Yep, early 1970s. I bought one then, still have it, and it still runs quite nicely. Can I make a plea on behalf of poor little Nell, and all her sisters? Please don't saw them up; they have a working-class beauty, all of their own, and a heritage not only in the LSWR C14, but the Bassett Lowke 112 tank. Simple, but effective engines, from a simple but effective (when not on strike) era. Those things at the front are smokebox wing plates, and are entirely typical of Victorian and Edwardian locos, built prior to a change in smoke-box design convention. K 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJS1977 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 In my case, I had a couple of spare bodies and the cut 'n' shut seemed a good way of putting them to use! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hayfield Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 I think this is the conversion John means http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/82968-niles-mostly-freelance-bodging-bench-coach-wagon-bodging/?p=1763373 I have also seen a conversion described somewhere (which I can't now find) using the 'Smokey Joe' chassis, which since that is made of plastic is fairly easy to shorten. You will still have to lose the front steps from the Nellie body to fit over the cylinders. HTH Moxy Looks great, I have not got my model to hand so size of body not known, but it depends on how much super detailing is done but here is a thought How about fitting a Branchlines (Southeastern Finecase also do one) P class chassis which is about 83 mm long wheelbase 44 mm.Or a Branchlines Terrier which is 92 mm long with a wheel base of 44 mm. Southeastern Finecase may also do an 0-4-0 etched chassis. With a modern motor etc OK its freelance but might be quite a fun winter project Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG John Posted October 15, 2016 Share Posted October 15, 2016 It's a shame I can't think of a suitable prototype to justify converting it to broad gauge! I've got a BG Smokey Joe, and have recently discovered it's not a bad match for some real BG dock tanks, so it's on the list for more surgery. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now