Jump to content
 

2999 steams at Didcot


45568
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Thanks to 7007 for drawing my attention to this in the Hornby Prairie thread.

 To see a locomotive whose last example was withdrawn two years after I was born is remarkable. Full credit to those involved at Didcot.

Cheers from Oz,

Peter C.

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Wow amazing to see.

 

its an odd looking beast...

 

very rectangular at the front end when viewed head on, disproportionate height and in cab shape between tender and footplate, and uneven spacing of driving wheels... theres not much gap between the front two driving wheels...

 

I cant wait to see this loco for real, Didcot always impresses.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know much about steam locos!  building a 5in gauge B17, but the cyl cocks i can understand. However snifting valves are usually connected to the inlet side of the superheater and when the regulator is opened is closed by steam pressure. When the regulator is closed, the snifter valves opens usually by gravity( well it does on my loco)  to allow air through the superheater tubes so they do not burn. The amount of steam coming out from between the frames looks more like leaky joints. BUT as it is a GW loco i guess they did thing differently lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Fenway Park said:

...will this be permitted on the main network?...

The potential for this surely depends on whether it has been built within the current gauge limits and equipment fit required by Network Rail, and then also its operational suitability. (The lever reverse strikes me as a fairly scary feature attached to a pair of valves actuated by engines capable of developing a thousand horse. The past is a foreign country, they did things very differently there...)

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
18 hours ago, adb968008 said:

Wow amazing to see.

 

its an odd looking beast...

 

very rectangular at the front end when viewed head on, disproportionate height and in cab shape between tender and footplate, and uneven spacing of driving wheels... theres not much gap between the front two driving wheels...

 

I cant wait to see this loco for real, Didcot always impresses.

 

GWR standard 7' 0"+ 7' 9" common for large 6 coupled locos (except King and Great Bear)

Stars & Castles have the same size wheels so would have the same clearance.

The wheel treads would be 7" apart but the flanges somewhat closer.

Edited by melmerby
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
18 hours ago, adb968008 said:

Wow amazing to see.

 

its an odd looking beast...

 

very rectangular at the front end when viewed head on, disproportionate height and in cab shape between tender and footplate, and uneven spacing of driving wheels... theres not much gap between the front two driving wheels...

 

 

Yes it's an important reminder of how shocking Churchward's  locos must have seemed when they first appeared

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • RMweb Premium

Are lamp brackets correct for the period?

When did the GWR change from sockets?

 

I've just answered my own questions by looking in Russell!

Nos 98 & 100 had sockets when new but within in a couple of years (by the time the main batches were built) they had the what we recognise as normal GWR pattern amp irons

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...