Jump to content
RMweb
 

Formula 1 2022


didcot

Recommended Posts

End of the first Test of 2022 and all made it to the end except Haas, Alpine and Aston Martin.

 

Hamilton lays down a marker in the dying minutes.

17:02

Chequered flag

That's it. The final day of testing draws to a close with Lewis Hamilton topping the timesheet ahead of Mercedes team-mate George Russell.

 

17:04

Post update

Lewis Hamilton had sneaked in one more quick lap for good measure, so finishes testing top of the order with 1:19.138.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary Rose

NEW

Posted at 17:1517:15

Final times

Lewis Hamilton (Mercedes) – 1:19.138– 94 laps

George Russell (Mercedes) 1:19.233 – 66 laps

Sergio Perez (Red Bull) – 1:19.556 – 74 laps

Max Verstappen (Red Bull) 1:19.756 – 59 laps

Sebastian Vettel (Aston Martin) 1:19.824 – 48 laps

Charles Leclerc (Ferrari) 1:19.831 – 44 laps

Carlos Sainz (Ferrari) – 1:20.072 – 92 laps

Alexander Albon (Williams) 1:20.318 – 94 laps

Nicholas Latifi (Williams) 1:20.699 – 13 laps

Daniel Ricciardo (McLaren) – 1:20.790 – 86 laps

Lando Norris (McLaren) 1:20.827 – 52 laps

Fernando Alonso (Alpine) 1:21.242 – 12 laps

Guanyu Zhou (Alfa Romeo) 1:21.939 – 41 laps

Pierre Gasly (Alpha Tauri) 1:22.469 – 40 laps

Nikita Mazepin (Haas) 1:26.229 – nine laps

Valtteri Bottas (Alfa Romeo) – 1:30.433 – 10 laps

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Oldddudders said:

George seems to have been the only one on C5

Lewis went out on C5s at the end too. Don't know if anyone else did.

 

Times from this test mean nothing whatsoever. Even less than usual with the new aero regulations. What's promising is that most teams managed to do a large volume of laps, and nobody was half an hour off the back.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, LNERandBR said:

Yeah, that sounds like the biggest problem the teams will need to get on top of. 

 

Apparently, it was an issue back in the 70s before ground effect was banned.

Yup. To avoid it you end up with almost rigid suspension. The ride by the end was virtually unmanageable for the drivers without the benefit of active suspension.

 

The effectiveness increases the closer the car runs to the ground (so teams will run as low as possible) until the bottom touches the ground and the air flow stalls. Car pops up then and the process starts again. The key to ground effect working is keeping the gap to the ground as small as possible but as stable as possible.

 

I'm surprised the FIA didn't consider the lotus twin chassis concept for this revamp. It was intended to give the driver a better ride (being lotus of cause it was the machinery that was the concern) while mounting the aero bits separately.

Edited by SR71
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Another thought. Has anyone read the rules to know if duel springs are allowed with the simplified suspension regs?

 

That was the pre active solution. Softer springs for when the aero wasn't so much in effect. Then harder springs the car settled into under aero load that minimised bottoming out.

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Andrew P said:

Or how about Roman Grosjean back, he knows the Car, the Team and they know him.

 

With the rule changes, it'll be a significantly different car to the one he last raced for them.

 

In any case, he seems quite comfortable in IndyCar these days; he's contracted to Andretti for 2022.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ejstubbs said:

 

With the rule changes, it'll be a significantly different car to the one he last raced for them.

 

In any case, he seems quite comfortable in IndyCar these days; he's contracted to Andretti for 2022.

If Fitipaldi gets the Drive, as Haas has said he would if Maz is out, then they will have Son and Grandson of two ex World Champions driving probably the slowest car of the pack, (although Alfa could be in contention for that honour).:D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

George makes a valid point but I've not seen anyone talk about what happens if you spin. Going backwards at speed the air going into a Venturi has the probability of lifting the car off the ground so over safety barriers and into catch fencing. This would be a much bigger safety concern.

 

Without addressing this I feel F1 has forgotten why the flat floor rule was brought in. I think Venturis are the right way to go but they need flaps, or similar, like a NASCAR to stop the air flow in the reverse direction.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ferrari backing Antonio Giovinazzi to replace Nikita Mazepin at Haas.

 

Yesterday Gunther Steiner did not deny having considered every scenario, indicating Pietro Fittipaldi (the team’s third driver for three years) as the first option 

 

 

https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-backing-antonio-giovinazzi-to-replace-nikita-mazepin-at-haas/?fbclid=IwAR2QiuUOVrIymBtNvrTWqiUTIOv7JdZqRDoJqWUrqmhSu6cvejCbLqDp04A

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Andrew P said:

 

Maybe the FIA should have extensively tested the reference 2022 car, not just constructed one for illustrative purposes. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rocor said:

 

Maybe the FIA should have extensively tested the reference 2022 car, not just constructed one for illustrative purposes. 

That would have needed some thought from Brawn & Co first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Think of it as an interesting challenge for them to solve as they constantly bang on about how clever they are with technology that can filter down to the roads ;) Strangely Danny R said it’s bad on theirs yet they were showing very strong laps and endurance. 
One of those things that could be solved quite easily with movable aero parts to prevent the stall but that’s banned :) 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PaulRhB said:


One of those things that could be solved quite easily with movable aero parts to prevent the stall but that’s banned :) 

 

Or active suspension, which is also banned.

 

https://www.racefans.net/2019/07/19/why-f1-rejected-proposal-to-legalise-active-suspension-in-2021/

 

If any team does come up with a brilliant solution to the problem within the rules, It is likely that the FIA will just change the rules mid-season. :(

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaulRhB said:

Think of it as an interesting challenge for them to solve as they constantly bang on about how clever they are with technology that can filter down to the roads ;) Strangely Danny R said it’s bad on theirs yet they were showing very strong laps and endurance. 
One of those things that could be solved quite easily with movable aero parts to prevent the stall but that’s banned :) 

 

1 hour ago, rocor said:

 

Or active suspension, which is also banned.

 

https://www.racefans.net/2019/07/19/why-f1-rejected-proposal-to-legalise-active-suspension-in-2021/

 

If any team does come up with a brilliant solution to the problem within the rules, It is likely that the FIA will just change the rules mid-season. :(

Hydralastic suspension, like the old days of the BMC 1100, 1300, and 1800. :D

 

Lando = PIT, PIT, PIT,  We need to pump you up a bit.:scared::notme:

  • Funny 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...