Jump to content
 

New product announcement - GW Mica 'B' van


Fishoutofwater
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Summarising from Atkins Hyde Beard & Tourret "A history of GWR goods wagons":

  • Diagrams for true Mica Bs were X2, X4, X5, X7 and X8.
  • X2/X4: Mansell coach wheels, vacuum brake, clasp shoes, 2ft buffers.
  • X4: long lever replaced by a DC quadrant and fixed cylinder arrangement.
  • The vacuum fittings of X1/X2 were gradually changed to match X4, some given a DCIII system.
  • X5: In 1912, freight wheels and axleguards replaced the Mansell coach wheels.
  • Height of all MICA vans was 11ft 9in with rather low buffer height of 3ft 4 1/2in.
  • X7 of 1921 as X5 but with 1ft 8in self contained buffers, fixed bars on doors.
  • X8 of 1923-6 as X7 but with Morton brake.

 

 

Edited by Harlequin
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Harlequin said:

Summarising from Atkins Hyde Beard & Tourret "A history of GWR goods wagons":

  • Diagrams for true Mica Bs were X2, X4, X5, X7 and X8.
  • X2/X4: Mansell coach wheels, vacuum brake, clasp shoes, 2ft buffers.
  • X4: long lever replaced by a DC quadrant and fixed cylinder arrangement.
  • The vacuum fittings of X1/X2 were gradually changed to match X4, some given a DCIII system.
  • X5: In 1912, freight wheels and axleguards replaced the Mansell coach wheels.
  • Height of all MICA vans was 11ft 9in with rather low buffer height of 3ft 4 1/2in.
  • X7 of 1921 as X5 but with 1ft 8in self contained buffers, fixed bars on doors.
  • X8 of 1923-6 as X7 but with Morton brake.

 

 

 

I did write an article on the MICA vans that @Miss Prismhas posted on the GWR Modelling page. I find them a very interesting wagon. And more a reason with the X8 being done, I hope to soon see a TEVAN and and the X7 diagram.

  • Like 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 minutes ago, Pendennis said:

Does anyone know whether KR Models interact with these fora like Accurascale/Rapido or stand aloof?

 

They did to begin with but unfortunately their chosen funding mechanism meant that they attracted a lot of criticism along the lines of 'this is a scam they are going to run off with my money'. (This was not long after a number of folk lost money to an unconnected failed operation funded on similar lines.)  Given the at times intense negativity I am not surprised that they withdrew from regular contact, although, as the threads on RMweb evidence, their products would be better if they were more open to help constructively offered.

  • Like 4
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Aktkins Beard & Tourret (p434 of the 2013 edition) indicate that '...representatives of all the X-group (except X3/6) passed into nationalisation.' Larkin, in Vol 4 of his 'Acquired Wagons' series only documents X9 & X10 vehicles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Larkin is incomplete. There is a photo of X4 W79771 dated to 1958 on p108 of Geoff Kent's 4mm Wagons (Part 2). This would be evidence of an appropriate post Nationalisation Livery, although the wagon in question appears to have lost its roof vents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
10 hours ago, Dungrange said:

 

Looking at the options, it looks to me as though it's whatever livery the preserved versions carry.

That is the way I interpreted it - although the prototype photographs are all of the Severn Valley example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 23/04/2023 at 10:05, Wickham Green too said:

Well, I hope the Didcot-derived ones aren't finished like this - http://www.ws.rhrp.org.uk/ws/WagonInfo.asp?Ref=6850 ............. though it MIGHT imply a post 1936 livery choice. 

 

Going by what little information we have given so far on the livery of the models and considering their focus has been on the SVR's example (GWR 105873), I would most likely say that the liveries will be pre-1936 as that is what 105873 has been presented in since returning to traffic. I cannot though speak for @KR Models so you would need to email them as to the livery.

 

The MICA at Didcot is currently a bare frame and is beginning it's overhaul. The photo on the Wagon Survey is quite an old photo now. Although I've only seen 105860 in post-36 livery as per below, I know the van has been in both pre and post 36 liveries during it's time at Didcot.

 

16845032644_4251d0528d_b.jpg

Edited by Garethp8873
  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 29/04/2023 at 22:53, Corbs said:

Maybe it's a sign of my age but I can't read MICA B without the voice in my head putting it to the theme tune of 'Byker Grove'.

 

 

I get Mika's 'Grace Kelly' stuck in my head every time I read this thread 😅 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
8 hours ago, rovex said:

So did these run in rakes or individually or a combination of the two?

I think there is probably evidence of them being used both ways out there. However, I believe that the most common usage would have been in larger numbers grouped together as where traffic justified the use of one wagon, the chances are that there was enough stuff to shift to justify the use of many (ship arriving at port and offloading huge quantities for example) 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Edge said:

I think there is probably evidence of them being used both ways out there. However, I believe that the most common usage would have been in larger numbers grouped together as where traffic justified the use of one wagon, the chances are that there was enough stuff to shift to justify the use of many (ship arriving at port and offloading huge quantities for example) 

 

As @Edge says it varied on the location in question. I have seen photos of either single or several MICA to varying diagrams in goods trains or in goods yards. I suspect you'd find the larger rakes of GWR MICA around London owing the markets. Outside London it would vary.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...