Jump to content
 

Class 04 shunters in action - BR Blue?


GraemeR BR (WR)
 Share

Recommended Posts

Weren't double headed 04s used on traffic to Silksworth Colliery near Sunderland back in the day?

 

Disgusting of Market Harborough

No, multi fitted 03's were used on the Silksworth Branch. D2052+D2053 & D2071+D2074 being so fitted. They seemed to keep that pairing until the end of traffic on the branch.

 

Paul J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, multi fitted 03's were used on the Silksworth Branch. D2052+D2053 & D2071+D2074 being so fitted. They seemed to keep that pairing until the end of traffic on the branch.

 

D2230 and D2232 "double headed" on the branch in late 1967. I say double headed as on the photographs I have showing this pairing, the in between cab area cannot be seen so can't say if jumpers were fitted.

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in my possession a couple of BR drawings (schematics) from the York drawing office dated 1966/67; relating to the fitting of multiple working apparatus to Cl.03 and Cl.04 locos.

.
The system was apparently air operated / pneumatic and involved some twelve jumper cables/hoses connecting the locos which would be coupled cab to cab

..
This appears to be a similar arrangement to that used on some of the 'cut down' BPGV locos

..
The drawings list the locos to which they refer, and is specific in their pairings, namely:-
Cl.03  2052 & 2053, 2071 & 2074.
Cl.04   2204 & 2248, 2230 & 2232, 2242 & 2244, 2260 & 2261, 2263 & 2264, 2265 & 2340,  2271 & 2272,

.

A Silksworth Branch train ( unfortunately with 03s in tandem )  is shown here;-

https://goo.gl/images/tB1WYm

 

Brian R

Edited by br2975
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unusual to see 2204 in there as I believe that was from the earlier batch ,didn't they have smaller wheels?

 

Possibly D2240 ????

 

But then again maybe not.

 

https://flic.kr/p/6Mk9F7

 

and then then perhaps the plot thickens with an undated view of 2204 with 2271

 

p1315131054-5.jpg

 

P

Edited by Porcy Mane
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

D2230 and D2232 "double headed" on the branch in late 1967. I say double headed as on the photographs I have showing this pairing, the in between cab area cannot be seen so can't say if jumpers were fitted.

 

P

I stand corrected. I should have realised they could have got up there, as Gateshead had multi fitted D2230+D2232 on its books.

 

Paul J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unusual to see 2204 in there as I believe that was from the earlier batch ,didn't they have smaller wheels?

 

 

Possibly D2240 ????

 

But then again maybe not.

 

https://flic.kr/p/6Mk9F7

 

P

I have a photo in my collection showing D2204 paired cab to cab with D2271, the usual multi working set up, at Bradford Hammerton Street in the late 60's, so it probably was, although how successful such a pairing would be with the different wheel sizes would be interesting to know?

 

Paul J.

 

Edited. Porcy Main now has the same photo in his post above.

Edited by Swindon 123
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The system was apparently air operated / pneumatic and involved some twelve jumper cables/hoses connecting the locos which would be coupled cab to cab

 

 

There is a phot (I think on this forum) of the intercab plumbing. A quick google hasn't unearthed it.

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have in my possession a couple of BR drawings (schematics) from the York drawing office dated 1966/67; relating to the fitting of multiple working apparatus to Cl.03 and Cl.04 locos.

.

The system was apparently air operated / pneumatic and involved some twelve jumper cables/hoses connecting the locos which would be coupled cab to cab

..

This appears to be a similar arrangement to that used on some of the 'cut down' BPGV locos

..

The drawings list the locos to which they refer, and is specific in their pairings, namely:-

Cl.03  2052 & 2053, 2071 & 2074.

Cl.04   2204 & 2248, 2230 & 2232, 2242 & 2244, 2260 & 2261, 2263 & 2264, 2265 & 2340,  2271 & 2272,

.

A Silksworth Branch train ( unfortunately with 03s in tandem )  is shown here;-

https://goo.gl/images/tB1WYm

 

Brian R

The BP& GV locos had a slight difference as far as I can tell. The drawings you have, and sent me, show there being an electrical connection as well as the air lines, which used to indicate low oil pressure on the trailing loco, by utilising the 2nd low oil pressure light on the leading loco. I have not been able to trace such a mod on 03145, although it might have been removed in later overhauls. Air pipes connected the locos and operated the throttle, 5 gears, forward/reverse, DSD, forward and reverse sanders, main air. The main alteration compared to unmod 03's was that the throttle had to be converted from cable control to air control. We still have the multi-working gear fitted on 03145, and are waiting for the oportunity to multi it up with another of its kind, or even an 04, D2272 still exists, one day.

 

Below is a photo showing under the desk of 03145, with all the extra air pipework, it is the unpainted plastic pipe weaving its way around the other pipework, required for the multi working.

post-7146-0-53771000-1530180643_thumb.jpg

 

Paul J.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

There is a phot (I think on this forum) of the intercab plumbing. A quick google hasn't unearthed it.

 

P

thread, with photos, here: http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/70818-multiple-working-fitted-cl03-cl04/

 

one links to Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/40011/6127593898

Edited by keefer
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unusual to see 2204 in there as I believe that was from the earlier batch ,didn't they have smaller wheels?

 

Well, I agree D2204 would be an odd choice, compared to the rest of the conversions.

.

So, I've dug out the relevant BR drawings, and this is the result:-

.

Brian R

post-1599-0-85089000-1530193342_thumb.jpg

post-1599-0-89963800-1530193364_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a couple of nice photos of D2052+D2053, mutied up in Blue livery in the sidings at Slksworth, and  a side shot on Sunderland shed in the newish, "First Generation Eastern & North Eastern Region Diesels in colour" by Book Law. They are most probably the two in the photo in the link in br2975's post 29. (http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/66882-class-04-shunters-in-action-br-blue/?p=3214261).

 

There is also a colour photo in the same book a few pages later, of D2205 in Green with wasp stripes & yellow buffer beam, but with BR Double arrow logos on the cabside, at Newburn Jcn, September 1967, proving you have to be careful sometimes when looking at B&W photos.

 

Paul J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

The BP& GV locos had a slight difference as far as I can tell. The drawings you have, and sent me, show there being an electrical connection as well as the air lines, which used to indicate low oil pressure on the trailing loco, by utilising the 2nd low oil pressure light on the leading loco. I have not been able to trace such a mod on 03145, although it might have been removed in later overhauls. Air pipes connected the locos and operated the throttle, 5 gears, forward/reverse, DSD, forward and reverse sanders, main air. The main alteration compared to unmod 03's was that the throttle had to be converted from cable control to air control. We still have the multi-working gear fitted on 03145, and are waiting for the oportunity to multi it up with another of its kind, or even an 04, D2272 still exists, one day.

 

Below is a photo showing under the desk of 03145, with all the extra air pipework, it is the unpainted plastic pipe weaving its way around the other pipework, required for the multi working.

attachicon.gif4- cab repaint finished. 2..jpg

 

Paul J.

Bloody pipes everywhere!

Is that still air throttle Paul? I would imagine the throttle lever is lighter in operation than with a cable.

A mate of mine owned 2063 and that had a very heavy throttle.

He also had 2280 an 04 that was better as it had a linkage rather than a cable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloody pipes everywhere!

Is that still air throttle Paul? I would imagine the throttle lever is lighter in operation than with a cable.

A mate of mine owned 2063 and that had a very heavy throttle.

He also had 2280 an 04 that was better as it had a linkage rather than a cable

Yes russ p, still has its air throttle, in fact all its multi working pipework is in place, except for a couple of plastic pipes that were split and we removed/blanked off. Can be a bit of a pain when you want to build up air quickly, as you need air to build the air up! Otherwise it is very light and responsive on the throttle. You can fine adjust it a little as there is an adjuster screw on the base of the air valve attached to the throttle, with which you can adjust the idle speed of the engine. I own D2302, but that has a cable throttle, which is a bit of a , but it needs to be looked at, and probably replaced with a new one. One more job for its upcoming overhaul!

 

Paul J.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Blurred photo of 03120/ 141/ 151? Taken from moving train at Llanelli, 7th Jan 84 clearly showing some gubbins....

 

1984 Jan 7th-14th (2).jpg

Iv modelled a couple of York 04s with the pipes made of fishing wire bt havnt seen a clear pic of the back connections ever. Looks to me like the pipes are hung over the handrails and theres some connector box?? This looks to be the best iv seen. Both on sidelined at mo with rubbish split chassis. Edited by jessy1692
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like I've started something with the Silksworth thread. ...i believe from my research into the Wisbech and Upwell twins that the first 10 (2201-2210?) had smaller wheels....

 

Disgusting of Market Harborough

The listed different wheel dia's, from my varoius BR driver books.

 

D2200-D2214, had 3'3" wheels.

D2215-D2273,  3'6" wheels.

D2274-D2340,  3'7" wheels. 

D2341 isn't listed, but i believe they were 3'6'', but this needs confirming.

 

Paul J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...