Jump to content
 

AlfaZagato

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,328

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by AlfaZagato

  1. AlfaZagato
    Split the first set with a pilot, to make a 2-6-6-0, and I think you'd have it. I'd personally make it a tender loco, as well. I know the locomen didn't want a tender flopping around downhill. For practical reasons, I don't think a tank would really work in the conditions. Admittedly, on very basic math (assuming a Standard 12 boiler from a King, and the same number of cylinders split onto both drive sets,) the suggested artic would be around 15 tons/axle
  2. AlfaZagato
    Depends heavily on the line. The Santa Fe, for example, built mostly, well, Santa Fe's, 2-10-4's, in significant quantities for freight hauling. Tenders on the things were nearly as long as the loco. The ATSF crossed some of the bleakest terrain in the US, though.
  3. AlfaZagato
    Even here in the US, where we have had bogie & braked freight since the 19th century, we still had distinct locomotives for freight service. I do imagine, given more advanced freight wagons in the UK, that the mixed-traffic types would have been built in even greater numbers. More notably, we would have likely seen the end of the 0-6-0 type not long after introduction of bogie freight. I'm happy to be corrected, but having neither pilot nor trailing wheels limits the theoretical speed of the type.
  4. AlfaZagato
    No, the DE that ran on the former LMS. You're thinking 18000. Though I will contend any turbine needs Armor Yellow at the end of the day.
  5. AlfaZagato
    In a slightly sillier tone, how would 10800, or a class 15 or 16, look in ATSF 'Bookend' blue? Or a BR approximation thereof? I bet you couldn't make one for a geep at a glance.
  6. AlfaZagato
    For going by Ruston, you sure do end up with a lot of Barclays. Since I stalk his threads, I know Barclay doesn't have your Rustons, either.
  7. AlfaZagato
    Then what of Pacifics? Same issues present there, yet they're one of the most common types worldwide. I do know that one issue with Prairies is that they like to hunt a bit, having a nominally balanced wheelbase. Especially if the center was driven, as was common.
  8. AlfaZagato
    Tendered 2-6-2 'Prairies' were only rare in the UK. They were fairly common in the US around turn of the century. They lasted forever here, too. Looks like Russia & the USSR both favored the type for passenger work.
  9. AlfaZagato
    Yeah, it's sometimes hard to fathom how a bogie hopper with bottom chutes was harder to accommodate than a 7-planker. Or the big LMS side-dumps. I'd imagine that those could even be emptied (messily) in to a normal staithe, or the chutes I've seen for unloading the 4-wheel planked wagons. Here's an imaginary loco for the thread. LMS Garratt with 8F axleboxes, improved brakes, and a Westinghouse air pump for working automatic hopper doors. Could manage MGR working some 30 years early.
  10. AlfaZagato
    Makes me think of some of my fellow countrymen...
  11. AlfaZagato
    That little blue one on the right is going to start everything. I just know it.
  12. AlfaZagato
    Hate to say so, but that's not it. Not much to do with N20's either way.
  13. AlfaZagato
    Are y'all sure you're not conflating the Bachman Bill/Ben here? Is it possible that one or the other sold the one tooling?
  14. AlfaZagato
    Now we're entering the realm of madness. @Londontram, were you the gentlemen who had a trolleybus layout featured in the publications a number of years ago? Or were you inspired by the same articles? I was always impressed with the layout, though I forget which magazine, and what the name of the layout was.
  15. AlfaZagato
    If I remember my reading correctly, 10000 didn't have a traditional 'firebox,' per se. More of a continuous furnace for direct heat on the watertubes. Though you would lose efficiency, and probably exceed the loading gauge, you could have the rear couple of axles run between the lower drums and the furnace. Can't imagine the wheels would do well, surrounded by that much heat. The rest of the locomotive didn't work, so I doubt too much difference would matter.
  16. AlfaZagato
    Certainly looks like a used tarp.
  17. AlfaZagato
    For the ultimate in compactness, I think you could get a Feldbahn on a 4x6 notecard.
  18. AlfaZagato
    I think an 'N20' to the front axle would be the order of the day on the square tanks.
  19. AlfaZagato
    Thanks for linking that. Looking back on the EP and deco samples, both issues being brought up now look fairly evident. We've had time to say something sooner. Doesn't look like anybody did, not at least here.
  20. AlfaZagato
    Were the thickness issues present on tooling samples? I find it odd that the pendants here and in the press wouldn't have caught something like that earlier. I don't think this is the first time we've seen the models in the flesh.
  21. AlfaZagato
    Do it. Cheaper than trying to go O-16.5
  22. AlfaZagato
    Wouldn't it be Warren on Polly? I don't know with these English placenames.
  23. AlfaZagato
    It was just a thought I had had in response to the comments on the reveal.
  24. AlfaZagato
    Does anyone have a Bachman "Donald" or "Douglas" to hand? Might want to see if the coarse details we're seeing here are present on the T&F jobs. That might be a sign. My original thought to have an 812 was to buy one the above, and (literally) deface it. Now I'm concerned we're paying a premium for a detailed Thomas model.
  25. AlfaZagato
    Now that thing is properly ugly.
×
×
  • Create New...