I agree, but I have to say I am disappointed that RE has chosen to criticise other manufacturers (and the entire model rail press!). I've just had their email inviting me to buy a 24 as an existing customer and am disappointed to note that they have another dig at the end of the email.
I've read some of the comments in this thread, particularly in response to Chris Leigh's accurate and insightful point about producing one model versus large numbers. Whatever the historic frustations with other manufacturers (for whom commissions might not have been a priority nor particularly profitable - and we know one has just been cancelled apparently leaving the manufacturer with stock), the harsh reality is that without the big boys there would probably be no RE, as the market would not be big enough. It is not RE who are spending large sums on advertising and PR in mainstream settings or developing and selling products that attract new blood to the hobby (trainsets, Thomas etc), who sponsor high profile events and shows or generate significant economic activity to expand the hobby (yet).
And let's be clear, RE's business model is cutting out the very independent retailers who everyone apparently thinks we should be supporting. Big suppliers may have cut margins, stock may be variable etc, but they are at least giving indie retailers something to sell, and at least one of the big players is now regularly turning out models that are selling, which indies desperately need. There was huge condemnation of Hornby for selling direct but apparently it is OK for RE? It is also a bit ironic to accuse others of a "lack of interest" in this era - exactly what will people be running behind their Class 24's? Presumably wagons and coaches made by these 'uninterested' firms? This is not criticism of RE's business model, but facts that suggest the criticism of others is uninformed.
As was pointed out earlier, several smaller businesses have been doing this recently, and it does not reflect well on them IMHO. I've stopped buying one model rail magazine, as it has appointed one such person as a contributor, and I find it irritating and tiresome.
If this model really is a defining moment in OO gauge loco fidelity let's concentrate on that rather than doing down the opposition. I hope this model lives up to its promise, and that it drives forward railway modelling. I celebrate this apparent leap forward, and wish RE every success.
And now I've got to try and find £160 for one of these in the run up to Xmas.............