Jump to content
 

Bucoops

RMweb Gold
  • Posts

    5,923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bucoops

  1. So UK site is changing to Railroad. Rude.

     

    So many people list their items in the wrong scale I gave up searching specifics a long time ago so that doesn't overly bother me.

     

    I see there's a category for empty boxes. Is there really that many listings that it needs its own category?

    • Like 1
  2. 42 minutes ago, bbishop said:

     

    Two minutes of normal breathing, ditto of shaking head, ditto of head up and down, ditto of heavy breathing, ditto of reading out a script, then a final two of normal breathing - all the time stepping back and forward.  Bill

     

    Sounds similar, maybe the treadmill was an optional extra the company went for to really hack us off!

  3. "Stratford" Drawing list - https://www.gersociety.org.uk/index.php/collection/65-stratford-drawings-and-microfilm-lists-nrm-format-7-19

     

    LNER Dwg list - https://www.railwaymuseum.org.uk/sites/default/files/2019-01/London %26 North Eastern Carriage and Wagon.pdf

     

    I think where it refers to suburban quad it means the KX ones? However I did see this on page 597:

     

    110 13285 D 31/5/1928 P 51’-0½” Underframe for Articulated Stock 13285.D* Underframe, bogie outer, quad 10” x 5”, twin 9½” x 4 3/8”, inner 10” x 5”; HNG 1/8/1928

     

    But that's it - everything else with "quad" in is for suburban sets or wagons. "Hertford" doesn't reveal anything useful and the lists don't appear to mention diagram numbers.

  4. 1 hour ago, EHertsGER said:

    Richard

     

    I am taking my guidance from the photograph on p138 of Harris’ book, but it’s hard to tell. The nearest coach (dia 105) looks as if this might be the case, or not, but on p116 is another dia 105 in a twin set showing the four lining up together. Were they staggered only on quad/quints? My interpretation is that the end (dias 105/102) coaches were built on standard 51’ frames, which we know, and so the truss rods were all aligned, being ‘standard’ an’ all. There seems little point redesigning a standard under-frame just for these fourteen sets.
     

    Now you’re going to find that drawing, I just know it…

     

    best,

    Marcus

     

    Looking again at the quint drawings, it's only the outer underframes that have the different height (depth?) trusses - the inner ones are even. Quint coaches are all the same body length so it must be due to the end bogies being set inboard compared to articulated ones. If the H-Quad sets have longer underframes for the outers then it would possibly make sense that all of them were the same depth?

     

    I haven't found anything obvious in the Stratford drawings list for your set - will see if I can find the main LNER ones on the NRM site again.

  5. 4 minutes ago, MikeParkin65 said:

    Will getting swiped by a face mask replace being swiped by a backpack as the new most annoying habit of fellow punters at an exhibition? :jester:

     

    I guess the easiest way to get closer to something you want to see is to cough...

     

    No I am not advising you do this :D

    • Like 1
    • Funny 6
  6. 5 hours ago, bbishop said:

    I had to attend a London Ambulance Service hub to be fit tested for PPE3.  I failed the first mask, then passed the second mask after a 40 minute test.  Yes I look like a Starwars stormtrooper!  Bill

     

    Did you have to use a treadmill whilst wearing it? That's what (very nearly) killed me!

     

    Here's one - all these masks offer the same level of protection (FFP3) -

     

    masks.png.91052d628ba90ff4ac93c38d9b0c6927.png

     

    The difference is the length of time you can wear them and they keep offering it. The hard part is getting anyone to admit how long each one is good for as there are so many variables. Obviously the full face with power can (in theory) be worn for longer than the disposable but even I know don't know how long they are actually effective for!

    • Like 2
  7. Apparently you only get one for that price. I've politely mentioned it's worth maybe £10 at most. 

     

    edit: he's happy with the price apparently. I wished him good luck.

    • Like 2
    • Funny 1
  8. Ok, dynamos - Paul has come up with two options - firstly increase the mounting hole size so a bracket can be fitted:

     

    1931093282_Dynamo1.jpg.68416f9e9f97d30096a139d6f0c1ac3c.jpg

     

    1091728356_Dynamo1a.jpg.b73a1c7ff396b2fb3af104b48be7c31e.jpg

     

     

    And secondly include the bracket - and these actually include a stabilising bracket on both sides - the idea being remove the one that isn't needed so they can be mounted in any position under the coach. I much prefer this method - do others agree?

     

    1759319538_Dynamo2.jpg.72b278aa89627f21d3900ac62d7c0a7a.jpg

     

    This is what it looks like with one side removed:

     

    62428868_Dynamo2a.jpg.fa10bc5f5af09a151dbf281fe1615f92.jpg

     

    2140207960_Dynamo2b.jpg.764cfe7ccd935173d3b04d9118182227.jpg

     

     

    Thoughts? :)

    • Like 5
    • Craftsmanship/clever 1
  9. 41 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

    Do the dynamos not come with brackets?

     

    Good point, I hadn't looked that closely at them yet. As they are scaled down from 7mm I assume it's easier for accurate brackets to be made for those. The mounting brackets appear to be as per the full size variant but would need drilling through and need a bracket making to swing it off. I will ask about the possibility of incorporating the mounting hardware.

  10. I've been watching this seller increase their O gauge range on ebay - https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/floyd_kraemer/m.html - straight away there's a few useful bits for 7mm modellers, but the other day I asked if they were able to re-scale to 4mm.

     

    These arrived today (Ignore the NER body, it's all I had to hand to give a quick trial fit):

     

    LNER Bucket seats (low and high back versions):

     

    1732601041_LNERBucket.thumb.jpg.507f0c2686d54654df55d8186b3de0a7.jpg

     

     

    Heavy duty dynamos (2 types):

     

    Various.thumb.jpg.b5505d6449000782e3c6f090de13d0f0.jpg

     

     

    And also representation of seating for the D30E restaurant car (will need plasticard tables and I just spotted I put the beading on some to the outside instead of the middle):

    1225120579_GERD30Eseats.thumb.jpg.e8d5ecdcd7f6c300d1e2a6c45862441b.jpg

     

     

    1542179857_14600-30E2.thumb.jpg.a7ebe58b7c9d0b5f9ee399aca6910632.jpg

     

     

    I don't think this is a D30E but the seating appears similar - this photo was used to get the approximate shape:

     

    296543965_s-l1600(2).thumb.jpg.ff7d95cb84b118a97077e549d2c75357.jpg

     

     

    The seats may need tweaking on the outside edges to take into account the tumblehome but they look really good.

     

    Paul said he is open to further requests in either scale.

     

    • Like 5
×
×
  • Create New...