I reckon 2014 was the year that diving cheesed me off more than anything in the PL. I'm a Chelsea fan, and my own club's players have let the game down in that regard, though probably no more so than any number of others.
This year, though, is already shaping up to be the year of refereeing inconsistency. If we take Vertonghen's close-contact handball yesterday as a benchmark, the referee took the (quite right, in my view) decision that it was hand-to-ball. If the decision had gone the other way, Chelsea might have got a point or more, but the ref declared it unintentional, and I think that's right.
By that token, if the same referee had been at Anfield, Liverpool's second penalty would not have been given, and Leicester might not still be rooted to the bottom of the table. I'm assuming, also, that a different ref would know the difference between Wes Morgan's face and his arm, so the first pen would never have been, either...
Stoke, too, would have had a penalty, and that might have changed the result (impossible to say "would have", of course, as you never know how teams react to adversity).
To be fair, I'd love the pundits on MOTD to actually read out loud one of the rules of the game each week. Let's establish once and for all what constitutes a handball, and what is meant by "intentional"! Once we all know what the rules are, we can be in a position to judge whether the referees are applying them. All I know right now is that they are not all interpreting them the same way, which could untimately make a nonsense of the league table.