Jump to content
 

The World's Worst Maintained Railway?


Baby Deltic

Recommended Posts

Those type lines are lines that were in such bad shape and had low traffic, that the original major railroad owners sold them off to shortlines. The shortlines operate them at the bare minimum requirements to squeeze out the last few cars of business until something major goes then it will be unprofitable to continue operations. First time a bridge goes out, the line shuts down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the warning signs on the front of the loco - 'Watch your step' and 'Always be careful'

 

Clearly they relate to climbing the ladders but given the state of the track may also be a good message to heed when powering anything along the permanent way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Seasick tablets for the crew?

 

I'll bet the crews are noted for their strict observence of the speed limit.

 

Would the rollingstock be subject to special inspection before being accepted by a Class 1 Railroad after a trip along here?

 

 

Kevin Martin

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also have to consider land mass - the whole of the UK dry land including all the railway lines ever to have existed would all fit inside just one US state, Wisconsin. The US has 49 other States a lot of which are considerably bigger than Wisconsin.

I say this because the scale of the USA is really awesome. Try driving alongside one of BNSF's Transcon route across Arizona on I40 for hours alongside some of the most beautifully laid concrete sleepered (tied) double track in the World carrying train after train of 1.4mile long InterModal freight travelling at 60 mph. Then realize you have only just scratched the surface of the US rail system.

 

It is amazing how they keep the mainlines so well.

 

 

 

Out of interest here's my local commuter line:

 

post-9016-0-74645200-1334455614_thumb.jpg

 

post-9016-0-60491500-1334455901_thumb.jpg

 

Here's my local Shortline:

 

post-9016-0-47997200-1334456071_thumb.jpg

 

Photos:â“’ Spooky Muse Inc. 2011 & 2012

 

Something for everyone, just like the UK........

 

Best, Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Natalie Graham

Is the a federal inspection system for lines such as these?

 

 

If there is, it doesn't seem particularly rigourous.

 

Try driving alongside one of BNSF's Transcon route across Arizona on I40 for hours alongside some of the most beautifully laid concrete sleepered (tied) double track in the World carrying train after train of 1.4mile long InterModal freight travelling at 60 mph.

Or try waiting at a level crossing while a 1.4 mile long train goes by. :rolleyes: It gets a bit tedious after the eight or so locos have gone by and you just have a mile and a bit of freight cars to wait for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the a federal inspection system for lines such as these?

 

Sure there is. Remember this is the lowest class of track there is, it is speed restricted and there are restrictions on hauling hazardous commodities over it. Its also extremely low volume. A class 5 or 6 main track might haul more tonnage in one or two trains than this type of line will haul in a year. Plus its exagerated through the telephoto lens to enhance the poor ride quality. Looking at this is like looking at some old alleyway and and saying the country doesn't have a very good highway system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

given the Maumee road crosses the Great Black Swamp.....an area [apparently] of NE Ohio that until relatively recent times was considered impassible for transportation....and was originally laid with light track anyway..it is no surprise that the shoestring outfit suffers from 'bad track'...!

 

[wiki is amazing really...I'm no US historian, BTW]................I suppose the road equates to the byelines of Norfolk and around the Wash in this country?

 

It is rather pleasant, however, to realise someone is prepared to eke out a living from moving freight [serving customers]..in this day and age? Keeping rail service going when, elsewhere, customers would have been 'encouraged' to revert to road transport, simply because rail interests could 'not be bothered?'

 

And the state of the track wont be any worse than that seen on certain UK industrial areas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...