WR ‘15XX’ 0-6-0PT - 00 Gauge

[AY Mod]

I've been pruning some posts about idiots and 'influencers'.

[G-BOAF]

4 minutes ago, AY Mod said:

 

On a loco we'll normally see one (unless we've bought one for ourselves as well). Most producers will send different liveries or versions to each mag to give variety. On coaches or wagons we may see a couple of diiferent variations or liveries.

Out of interest, is it 'mint boxed' or have the manufacturers tested/inspected before dispatch? Normally when I read reviews which highlight imperfections, this is down to it being a review or production 'sample' that is well handled and/or well run in!

[AY Mod]

9 minutes ago, G-BOAF said:

Out of interest, is it 'mint boxed' or have the manufacturers tested/inspected before dispatch? Normally when I read reviews which highlight imperfections, this is down to it being a review or production 'sample' that is well handled and/or well run in!

 

It can vary; it can be a sample which has seen use or it can be completely unmolested. Neither category seems to have any bearing on findings.

[Silver Sidelines]

1 hour ago, MikeParkin65 said:

Thanks for more footage of your lovely layout of which I am quite jealous! It strikes me that the apparent jerkiness downhill is the caused by the stock being 'loose coupled' which of course in real life it wouldnt be. And is the loco running on the DC equivalent of EMF - the electronics  seems to be trying to compensate for both the gradient and the inconsistent movement of the train if you see what I mean.

Thanks Mike, my wife edits my Posts and is continually pointing out that I need to add more scenery!  Loose coupled, maybe between the engine and the first carriage.  All the mini couplings between the coaches have been moved slightly inboard and the rake is effectively tensioned by the corridor connectors.  1504 is not digital, it doesn't make any difference to the issue whether the brake simulator on the Gaugemaster DS is switched on or off.

 

Cheers Ray

[gwrrob]

1 hour ago, AY Mod said:

 

On a loco we'll normally see one (unless we've bought one for ourselves as well). Most producers will send different liveries or versions to each mag to give variety. On coaches or wagons we may see a couple of diiferent variations or liveries.

 

A heads up for your review in this month's BRM, ugly and functional but brilliantly captured sums it up perfectly.😎

[AY Mod]

1 hour ago, gwrrob said:

A heads up for your review in this month's BRM, ugly and functional but brilliantly captured sums it up perfectly.😎

 

Might I have got away with calling a Pannier ugly? 😁

[PhilMortimer]

Just now, AY Mod said:

 

Might I have got away with calling a Pannier ugly? 😁

Ooooo!! Living dangerously!

[gwrrob]

26 minutes ago, AY Mod said:

 

Might I have got away with calling a Pannier ugly? 😁

 

It will still get into Tim’s First Class Pannier Lounge.

[Ian Hargrave]

28 minutes ago, AY Mod said:

 

Might I have got away with calling a Pannier ugly? 😁

For now…..🌝….just don’t overstep it with Rob by mentioning a double chimney Castle.

[97xx]

@RapidoCorbs I'm now very annoyed.

 

Having returned my badly-running 15xx for a refund, my request has been ignored and I've been sent an even worse one.  It has a hopeless eccentricity - see videos attached.

 

Plus it's blindingly obvious that the rear axle (which was OK on the original one) has a wheel with indeed the centre not in the centre.

 

I don't care how 'detailed' it is if it basically runs like a dog.

 

If you'd done what I explicitly asked for, this post would not be here to show yet another hopeless chassis.

 

https://app.box.com/s/9pm1zx5cq2xn188lkfazrxxmexxj6sck

https://app.box.com/s/9o7pgw34nk52zxwiq2ycv8x87jp021a7

 

For good measure here is a chassis I made in 1975 in my Dad's garage with a drill and two bits of brass strip held together in a vice. If the 15xx was half as good as this (which isn;t brilliant I admit) I'd be fairly happy although bemused why holes and right angles are not possible in modern china.

 

https://app.box.com/s/gvm3brxufwsp3j3fdagp2rh65xtgjd5o

 

@RapidoCorbs What do I now need to do to GET MY MONEY BACK?

[G-BOAF]

One wonders how GWR designs might have evolved had nationalisation not happened. 

[AY Mod]

16 minutes ago, 97xx said:

GET MY MONEY BACK?

 

Stop shouting please. I am confident they will address any needs without you barking on here.

[phil-b259]

16 minutes ago, 97xx said:

 

 

@RapidoCorbs What do I now need to do to GET MY MONEY BACK?

 

Its very simple - return it to the retailer from which you purchased it as not fit for purpose!

 

 

[97xx]

3 minutes ago, AY Mod said:

 

Stop shouting please. I am confident they will address any needs without you barking on here.

Please do not be offensive - if you consider I was raising my voice, that does not constitute me being offensive.

[97xx]

5 minutes ago, phil-b259 said:

 

Its very simple - return it to the retailer from which you purchased it as not fit for purpose!

 

 

Er, this was a warranty return to, and 'repair' by, Rapido, from whom I bought the original direct.

[AY Mod]

4 minutes ago, 97xx said:

Please do not be offensive - if you consider I was raising my voice, that does not constitute me being offensive.

 

I'm not in the mood for crap today. Think before you post; I will not have you using RMweb as leverage for your complaint when there are existing lines of communication.

[phil-b259]

21 minutes ago, 97xx said:

Er, this was a warranty return to, and 'repair' by, Rapido, from whom I bought the original direct.

 

Doesn't matter who you bought it from, your rights are the same regardless of whether you bought it from a retailer or direct from the manufacturer.

 

Rapido will know this - they also know trading standards don't take kindly to people trying to doge their obligations so I'm quite sure that if you simply told Rapido you wanted a refund then they would oblige you.

[RapidoCorbs]

31 minutes ago, 97xx said:

@RapidoCorbs I'm now very annoyed.

 

Having returned my badly-running 15xx for a refund, my request has been ignored and I've been sent an even worse one.  It has a hopeless eccentricity - see videos attached.

 

Plus it's blindingly obvious that the rear axle (which was OK on the original one) has a wheel with indeed the centre not in the centre.

 

I don't care how 'detailed' it is if it basically runs like a dog.

 

If you'd done what I explicitly asked for, this post would not be here to show yet another hopeless chassis.

 

https://app.box.com/s/9pm1zx5cq2xn188lkfazrxxmexxj6sck

https://app.box.com/s/9o7pgw34nk52zxwiq2ycv8x87jp021a7

 

For good measure here is a chassis I made in 1975 in my Dad's garage with a drill and two bits of brass strip held together in a vice. If the 15xx was half as good as this (which isn;t brilliant I admit) I'd be fairly happy although bemused why holes and right angles are not possible in modern china.

 

https://app.box.com/s/gvm3brxufwsp3j3fdagp2rh65xtgjd5o

 

@RapidoCorbs What do I now need to do to GET MY MONEY BACK?

 

Oh crumbs, I'm so sorry that you've twice been sent a dud. Completely understand your frustration - I'll drop you a private message.

[97xx]

Thank you @RapidoCorbs for such a swift, understanding, and courteous reply, plus the PM.

 

To reiterate, you at Rapido HQ designed a potentially truly outstanding model, and I am sure we all feel your pain at the issues you've experienced.

[timbo2857]

Any ideas where I can find number plates for 1501? Fox Transfers have sold out.

[Mark C]

Try 247 Developments (no connection other than a satisfied customer) - I recently bought 1504 cabside plates and a smokebox numberplate.  Very friendly and quick service...

[Mark C]

Here's a quick photo...

[timbo2857]

14 hours ago, Mark C said:

Here's a quick photo...

Thanks, I will give them a try, though its a pity they dont have a proper web site to buy online.

[greatcoleswoodhalt]

On 16/09/2023 at 12:28, RapidoCorbs said:

Hope we/Rails can get it sorted 👍

 

Have to say that Rails of Sheffield have been excellent - quick responses and an immediate issue of a returns label last week.  Received an email Thursday (28th) confirming a replacement had been tested/checked for defects and she arrived this morning.

 

As mentioned previously, it's a fantastic model - a few glue marks (as others have commented on), but nothing too sinister that weathering won't hide.

 

Initial disappointment put into context with 'Thought of the Month' in yesterday's newsletter - over 360 parts with most retailers selling at £127.50, give or take -  everyone will have their own thoughts on what's value, but I can't knock that.

[Mark C]

1 hour ago, timbo2857 said:

Thanks, I will give them a try, though its a pity they dont have a proper web site to buy online.

Indeed, but a quick call and chat with the very helpful proprietor, and a by-return service will sort you out.