Jump to content
 


Gopher
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Gopher said:

Been a while since the Curran's siding was used

 

The infernal combustion engine and associated economics starting to mark a change in approach to transportation of goods and people by rail that will soon see the demise of so many similar facilities.

 

But I'm telling you the plot. . . . .

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fishplate said:

 

The infernal combustion engine and associated economics starting to mark a change in approach to transportation of goods and people by rail that will soon see the demise of so many similar facilities.

 

But I'm telling you the plot. . . . .

You are spot on John.  I'm always amazed at how many private owner sidings there were on our railways back in the day.     

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A bit of a battle going on at the moment (all in my head).  I model BR Western region late 1950s/60s.  I am not adverse to using Rule 1 (within reason).  So I run  trains from other regions on my layout.  The consistent theme being they are all pretty much of the same era, and possibly might have visited the Welsh Marches.   

 

So why am I consistently drooling over the Kernow Steam Rail Motor ?  I never thought I'd see a ready to run model of this loco, and it looks wonderful apart from the oversized lamps.  I could just about justify running the preserved version number 93.   Or even argue under rule 1 that another version was preserved    (I quite like the GWR lined crimson lake livery - number 85).

 

Get thee behind me Satan (and keep pushing).  I also normally pay for new locos by selling other locos/rolling stock.  Can't see me doing that this time, so may have to sell my body 😄.  (which is very unlikely to raise anywhere near the required funds).   I have not mentioned any of this to my wife - so please keep it between us.        

Edited by Gopher
  • Like 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 5
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

8 minutes ago, Gopher said:

Get thee behind me Satan (and keep pushing). 

 

 Either its a Railtour. Or. Perhaps...... Dewchurch has become a 1980's preservation line . . . 😇

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
17 minutes ago, Fishplate said:

 Either its a Railtour. Or. Perhaps...... Dewchurch has become a 1980's preservation line . . . 😇

 

I don't think that you're helping 😁

It's a very nice model though, isn't it? I also can't think of why I would want one on an 1930's SDJR railway, but…

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobAllen said:

I don't think that you're helping 😁

 

Just offering options. . . . .😇

 

(One of which can be 'do nothing')

 

1 hour ago, RobAllen said:

It's a very nice model though, isn't it? I also can't think of why I would want one on an 1930's SDJR railway, but…

 

Now who's not helping ??? 🤣🤣🤣

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fishplate said:

Either its a Railtour. Or. Perhaps...... Dewchurch has become a 1980's preservation line . . . 😇

 

Yes that would work John .  Other alternatives - do nothing (as you say), build a 1920s/30s GWR layout (no room).  Stretching Rule 1 to the limit - there is of course the very well known GWR museum in Worcester, where they have a number of preserved and still working locos  - including the rail motor  

 

1 hour ago, RobAllen said:

I don't think that you're helping 😁

It's a very nice model though, isn't it? I also can't think of why I would want one on an 1930's SDJR railway, but…

I think you should go for it Rob.  Then I can use the time honoured excuse "Well Rob bought one"

Edited by Gopher
  • Like 1
  • Funny 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

When I decided to build St Mungo's it was to be purely a Caledonian Railway small terminus in Glasgow set between 1918-1920.  That soon changed, due to my interests, so I'm currently building stock for LNER c1936, BR c.1957, BR 1962-68, Tyneside electrics and, rather an odd one, a fictitous terminus for the Spurn Head Railway!  Fortunately, all that will need changing are to accommodate all these are a couple of buildings, road vehicles, people and signals! A third rail for the tyneside electrics will be easy to add/remove, which means that I could even buy/build some SR stock, both prewar and and  BR periods!  If I was ever tempted to join the dark side I think it could even become a GWR terminus!  

 

I think I need help!😂

 

Roja

 

 

  • Round of applause 1
  • Friendly/supportive 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 37Oban said:

Hi,

 

When I decided to build St Mungo's it was to be purely a Caledonian Railway small terminus in Glasgow set between 1918-1920.  That soon changed, due to my interests, so I'm currently building stock for LNER c1936, BR c.1957, BR 1962-68, Tyneside electrics and, rather an odd one, a fictitous terminus for the Spurn Head Railway!  Fortunately, all that will need changing are to accommodate all these are a couple of buildings, road vehicles, people and signals! A third rail for the tyneside electrics will be easy to add/remove, which means that I could even buy/build some SR stock, both prewar and and  BR periods!  If I was ever tempted to join the dark side I think it could even become a GWR terminus!  

 

I think I need help!😂

 

Roja

 

 

That is a good plan Roja.  I think you should embrace the dark side and factor in a GWR terminus.  You know it makes sense, so resistance is futile 😄    

 

Clive

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Funny 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...