RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 1, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 1, 2013 I hadn't noticed that the thread had passed 50,000 views. not that it really matters but it's an excuse for a couple of photos, with the 8F and the (almost finished) Black Five on the layout. The camera (or possibly me) was struggling today and the below two are the best ones of the 8F to come out but as can be seen, the flash went off in the first and you can see too much of the 'real World' (e.g. the wall, lamp, etc) in the second. Still..... And here is the Black Five, running light (most of my stock is in boxes now, awaiting the forthcoming move to a location where I can actually have a backscene, proper lighting, etc). Just for kicks, I thought I would get a photo of the Hornby image of how the loco once looked, with how it now looks. The flash went off again 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 (edited) Just an observation Jason. While it might be assumed the inside of the coal space would be rusty, and it would be if a loco was left out of service for some period of time, the coal that was dumped into tenders and bunkers was often wet. The smaller particles adhered to the coal space sides just as they did in coal wagons, and as the coal was used up it left a tidemark of sludge. Even if loaded dry, the fieman would soon have the hose on it to keep down dust. Edited May 1, 2013 by coachmann 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold roundhouse Posted May 1, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 1, 2013 Lovely and grimey! I think one of the most satisfying things after buying a new loco is weathering it. Some times I have even forgotten to test run it before attacking with a the paints etc!! Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 1, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 1, 2013 Just an observation Jason. While it might be assumed the inside of the coal space would be rusty, and it would be if a loco was left out of service for some period of time, the coal that was dumped into tenders and bunkers was often wet. The smaller particles adhered to the coal space sides just as they did in coal wagons, and as the coal was used up it left a tidemark of sludge. Even if loaded dry, the fieman would soon have the hose on it to keep down dust. I picked up the rusty coal space 'tip' from Shackleton's book. I'll take it back a bit with some soot, etc. Cheers Larry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted May 1, 2013 RMweb Gold Share Posted May 1, 2013 I picked up the rusty coal space 'tip' from Shackleton's book. I'll take it back a bit with some soot, etc. Cheers Larry. I would take it back more than bit to be honest Jason - Larry is very much on the money and in the period you're portraying the coal space metalwork was as he said - often layered with coal while any rust that did show tended to be dark and, again, not much different in shade from the coal blackened areas. And of course there would also possibly still be some of the original black paint present as well - but not much and in patches. the idea of 'rust everywhere' on steam engines in traffic is far from accurate from what I remember - yes there was sometimes rust, especially on burnt smokebox areas and on engines which had been out of traffic for a while. But otherwise there was a coating of grime which included oil or grease in many areas and that kept rust at bay. The fine 'dirty rust' misting on cylinder fronts (as you've got on 5026) was caused by steam and water and is a very typical effect on slightly down at heel locos although it could as easily be found on locos in otherwise clean condition. One effect which tends to drive me onto the soapbox is 'white streaks' - these came from lime/chalk in the water and were thus something which were affected by local water supplies; lots of lovely soft water and there'd be little or no such staining, hard water and it could get quite bad especially if softening plants weren't present or weren't properly maintained. In other words folk should study engines as they were in the area they are modelling. (Not a criticism of your weathering in this regard but as I'd mounted my hobby-horse ... etc, sorry). 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 1, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 1, 2013 (edited) I've taken it right back with black weathering powders and real soot now. After taking the photo, I have added some more coal at the front too; it hadn't registered earlier, but the back of the doors to access the coal bunker isn't detailed in any way and it looked a bit odd. Not the best shot, but I wanted to get it in natural light rather than the flash or the yellow glow of the lamp I use to try and get photos without flash in the attic. Edit: I agree about the streaking from limescale for locos from this area. It is spot on for engines from, say, the Peaks but for Lancashire, West Riding and Cumbria, the water is lovely and soft. My Mum has had the same kettle for years and there is no limescale in it whatsoever, whereas mine in Oxford seems to be growing a rockery ! Edited May 1, 2013 by Sandside 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LNER4479 Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 The fine 'dirty rust' misting on cylinder fronts (as you've got on 5026) was caused by steam and water and is a very typical effect on slightly down at heel locos although it could as easily be found on locos in otherwise clean condition. I also think that a contributory factor to this common effect is the simple action of what ever is on the rail surface (particularly on a wet day) being 'flicked' back towards the cylinder front by the leading wheel as it travels forward. You get precisely the same effect if you ride your bike on a rainy day without mudguards!! Quote from Dick Hardy's seminal 'Steam in the Blood' in a photo caption (p.47) of 70004 sparkling like a new pin, ready for the "Golden Arrow": 'On a dirty day she would come home covered with mud and dirt from end to end'! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy C Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 I'd go further than Stationmasters very sage advice about studying the area you model - Use a photo of the actual machine you are weathering, you can't go wrong then! Something Ive done on all of mine, that way no know it all can say its wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebottle Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 (edited) Who'd have thought that a discussion of the colour of the inside of a tender coal space could be so interesting? It's typical of this thread, though, that Jason describes and photographs the latest step in the building of Bacup; this stimulates informed comment and advice; appropriate modifications are made and photographed and ... A virtuous circle indeed! Edit: underlining. Edited May 1, 2013 by bluebottle 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
51235 Posted May 1, 2013 Share Posted May 1, 2013 Another thing to consider with the inside of the coal space in tenders, is the abrasive action of the coal itself. Coal dropped from any height which then slides down the slope of the tender inside, removes paint and rust and will leave a shiny metallic surface. In the case of the 8F and black 5, the coal in the tender covers this nicely - but it is one to consider if you want to model an almost empty tender. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Popular Post Jason T Posted May 1, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Popular Post Share Posted May 1, 2013 A couple more in progress. Maybe a bit too much metalcote gunmetal for the 3f? I have a photo of 43734 in Rochdale on a parcels working (of all things). I'm sure Andy C knows the very shot I am talking about Ivatt 2MT 46406. The cabside numbers are possibly a tiny bit wonky on this side, much better on the other but showing that side would be cheating. How 46406 used to look (when it was 46426), after a really poor weathering attempt a few years ago, pictured on the previous layout. Hopefully it is looking better now... Both together 22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Physicsman Posted May 1, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 1, 2013 Jason, the weathering on the Ivatt is superb, with just the right amount of grot and rust on the boiler and handrails. I hope you are able to dismantle Bacup with minimal damage during your forthcoming move. It gets better every time I look at it. The attention to detail is quite fantastic! Jeff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium 2ManySpams Posted May 1, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 1, 2013 Jason, if Damian offers to help you move the layout with the help of some of his 'fine touch' modelling tools then beware and search him for crowbar, circular saw and sledge hammer!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark axlecounter Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Another ivatt what was a local one was 46437 it was a regular one and it also went up on a special The layout looks good Jason hope you are keeping well you will have to come to bacup to see the nutters lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew P Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 A couple more in progress. Maybe a bit too much metalcote gunmetal for the 3f? I have a photo of 43734 in Rochdale on a parcels working (of all things). I'm sure Andy C knows the very shot I am talking about Ivatt 2MT 46406. The cabside numbers are possibly a tiny bit wonky on this side, much better on the other but showing that side would be cheating. How 46406 used to look (when it was 46426), after a really poor weathering attempt a few years ago, pictured on the previous layout. Hopefully it is looking better now... Both together Cracking weathering there Jason. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 14, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 14, 2013 (edited) I've not been up to much recently, what with the impending move. However, I have been tinkering away at a couple of things. Firstly, adding the low railings to the other pavement under the road bridge, still in need of weathering. The telegraph pole needs straightening out Secondly, numbering the two Cambrian ex-LMS 5 plank wagons and the Hornby LMS brake van I messed around with ages ago, with HMRS Methfix numbers. I thought renumbering locos was fiddly; I was wrong. I swear that I went cross-eyed trying to get them aligned, etc. Edit: Yes, individual numbers Edited May 14, 2013 by Sandside 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy C Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 A couple more in progress. Maybe a bit too much metalcote gunmetal for the 3f? I have a photo of 43734 in Rochdale on a parcels working (of all things). I'm sure Andy C knows the very shot I am talking about I Yes indeed Jason and its a bit of a snap situation as 43734 is on New Hey working the evening Oldham / Stoke parcels. The loco at the time was allocated to Rose Grove - Richard Greenwood can tell you in graphic detail just how much these Midland machines were hated by the ex L and Y men up there, they were sent out on this working as often as possible in the forlorn hope that they would never come back! It was inevitable as such I'd do it for New Hey on the short parcels - theres another photo of it in the Jeff Wells books at Jubilee Crossing just coming out of New Hey on the same working, thats the train I've modelled - just got to get round to the EM conversion of the Loco! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 16, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 16, 2013 I've just uploaded a new header photo for the thread: 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebottle Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 Secondly, numbering the two Cambrian ex-LMS 5 plank wagons and the Hornby LMS brake van I messed around with ages ago, with HMRS Methfix numbers. I thought renumbering locos was fiddly; I was wrong. I swear that I went cross-eyed trying to get them aligned, etc. Edit: Yes, individual numbers Excellent job, but the Oxford English Dictionary ought to include this as an example in their entry for the word "masochism"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 16, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 16, 2013 Yep, and when they are weathered, you won't really be able to make them out anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachmann Posted May 16, 2013 Share Posted May 16, 2013 I've just uploaded a new header photo for the thread: Mills in't thills........Shades of Holinwood there except Hollinwoods bridge sometimes made single deckers out of double deckers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Jason T Posted May 16, 2013 Author RMweb Premium Share Posted May 16, 2013 You know, I'm still not sure what colour to paint the bridge. At the moment, it is GWR Wagon Grey, which I am sure is not right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium southern42 Posted May 16, 2013 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 16, 2013 (edited) I've not been up to much recently, what with the impending move. However, I have been tinkering away at a couple of things. Firstly, adding the low railings to the other pavement under the road bridge, still in need of weathering. The telegraph pole needs straightening out ............................etc Hi Jason. This is looking really great but I wouldn't worry too much about that telegraph pole. Have a look at this one! Former railway station, Widmerpool, Nottinghamshire. Polly Edit: delete delete duplicate Edited May 16, 2013 by southern42 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizard of the Moor Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 I see that the Britannia Coconut Dancers get a mention on the BBC News website today: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22528184 Good on 'em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now