Jump to content
 

The changing face of Bristol


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
7 hours ago, eastwestdivide said:

Bit of a caption/photo mismatch on that story at the moment. If the station design is like that, then inflation may not be a problem...

802218222_Portisheadstorycaptionproblem.jpg.ec81e5e33d6bd7893cb602de73f7b730.jpg

 

If they'd built Portishead station at the very beginning of the project, that IS what it would look like now.

  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
10 hours ago, eastwestdivide said:

Bit of a caption/photo mismatch on that story at the moment. If the station design is like that, then inflation may not be a problem...

802218222_Portisheadstorycaptionproblem.jpg.ec81e5e33d6bd7893cb602de73f7b730.jpg

 

 

Unfortunately this image may be closer to the truth than we suppose. FosBR (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) gives more details of the compromises that were conceded to get this deal through https://fosbr.org.uk/funding-agreed-for-portishead-railway/

  • Reduction of scope to bring the existing freight line up to passenger train line standards
  • Reduction of Portishead and Pill platform lengths from 5-Car to 3-Car
  • Removal of Portishead station building
  • Reduction in selected highway scope (car parks, bridge works)
  • Change in governance model, with DfT taking on the client role.

 

Still, it's a relief that the project is still going ahead at all.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Andy Kirkham
  • Like 4
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Andy Kirkham said:

Reduction of Portishead and Pill platform lengths from 5-Car to 3-Car

Hmm, that may be a decision that will be regretted in years to come. Commuter traffic to/from Portishead is likely to be heavy. A 3 car limit will mean sardine conditions in the rush hours. 

 

I remember 3 car trains during the morning rush hour on the Portsmouth-Bristol route having people hanging out of the windows after the Bath stop.

 

A shame, since I think that the commuter traffic must be one of the major targets for the Portishead line - Bristol has truly awful road traffic and the rail route is likely to be a success because of that.

 

If I was in charge, 6 car would be my minimum for the platforms.

 

Yours, Mike.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
13 minutes ago, KingEdwardII said:

Hmm, that may be a decision that will be regretted in years to come. Commuter traffic to/from Portishead is likely to be heavy. A 3 car limit will mean sardine conditions in the rush hours. 

 

I remember 3 car trains during the morning rush hour on the Portsmouth-Bristol route having people hanging out of the windows after the Bath stop.

 

A shame, since I think that the commuter traffic must be one of the major targets for the Portishead line - Bristol has truly awful road traffic and the rail route is likely to be a success because of that.

 

If I was in charge, 6 car would be my minimum for the platforms.

 

Yours, Mike.

I've written on this thread earlier Mike, that you can design for longer platforms and bigger car parks but not build them now.  Once the traffic develops, build the extensions.  Having the massive station building from day one is unnecessary (apart from having a fancy building for all the great and good, many of whom have caused a huge amount of delay and increased cost to the project, to have a ceremony in to congratulate themselves); you can start with a temporary building at one end of the platform and build the larger permanent one at the other when needed.

 

Rob

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Northmoor said:

I've written on this thread earlier Mike, that you can design for longer platforms and bigger car parks but not build them now.  Once the traffic develops, build the extensions.  Having the massive station building from day one is unnecessary (apart from having a fancy building for all the great and good, many of whom have caused a huge amount of delay and increased cost to the project, to have a ceremony in to congratulate themselves); you can start with a temporary building at one end of the platform and build the larger permanent one at the other when needed.

 

Rob

Yes I reluctantly agree with this. Get the thing open, hopefully it will be the great success I think it might be, then look to enhance the facilities, and service, as soon as they can be justified/paid for.

I want the Portishead re-opening to add ammunition to other campaigns, for Tavistock re-opening for example.

 

cheers

  • Like 3
  • Agree 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, KingEdwardII said:

Hmm, that may be a decision that will be regretted in years to come. Commuter traffic to/from Portishead is likely to be heavy. A 3 car limit will mean sardine conditions in the rush hours. 

 

I remember 3 car trains during the morning rush hour on the Portsmouth-Bristol route having people hanging out of the windows after the Bath stop.

 

A shame, since I think that the commuter traffic must be one of the major targets for the Portishead line - Bristol has truly awful road traffic and the rail route is likely to be a success because of that.

 

If I was in charge, 6 car would be my minimum for the platforms.

 

Yours, Mike.

 

They may be able to get around this and run 5 car trains, by allowing one car to extend each end of the platform at Portishead. That is certainly allowable, under the ORR rules, for a through station (so ok for Pill) but it would require special dispensation to be undertaken at a terminus, and would require the platform to be relocated from what is presumably the original plan.

 

On the face of it though, the difference in cost between a three car platform and a five car is negligible, amounting to a few hundred thousand pounds (using modern modular construction). There would appear (from Google Earth) to be no gradient problems or special earthworks needed for the longer length. Out of £152m, it seems to be a strange concession. It would appear that this was agreed due to the slow recovery of passenger numbers from covid (which is actually less and less true), but as this does not open until probably 2026, that hardly makes sense.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 5
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Early trip to the Beach this morning and thought of getting pictures of progress, or lack of, at Portway Parkway. But ended up chatting to regulars on a quiet train. I did notice on Thursday that about 2/3 of the platform is in, but much still to do. I'm on the first down tomorrow, so, hopefully, I might get some photos from the back cab.

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

As promised, some shots of Portway Parkway progress.

298025338_10162234685524012_2442599824193904220_n.jpg.63f9670e58ec8e1aeaae32b6b4b07507.jpg

298065448_10162234685989012_1371354859050284916_n.jpg.b98234214c7121087097ec4e492bea80.jpg

298164892_10162234685864012_9004518449449468008_n.jpg.b03c9b729acf08c113e07042b9c8cda9.jpg

298247587_10162234685639012_6732298530697987445_n.jpg.b2d0468e8104755a13717d45c5cf0069.jpg

298025338_10162234685524012_2442599824193904220_n.jpg.d0682751bb2ec1ce6c6eb5e9a03d905e.jpg

'Digital Doris' already has the station code in, when you leave Shirehampton or Avonmouth, you get "The next station is..........." So I presume that there is a transponder for the GPS at the station that will kick in once opened.

Edited by JZ
  • Like 8
  • Informative/Useful 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
38 minutes ago, KeithHC said:

Nice to see at long last Gipsy Patch Lane is now fully opened.

 

Keith

I'll cycle that way on Thurs, I wonder how cyclist friendly the route through the new bridge to the A38 is?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Trip down the Beach this morning. Didn't get to get photograph Portway Parkway as it was still dark on the way out and fairly busy selling tickets on the return. I did get a glimpse of it though and can report that the platform is complete and most of the edging is done. Not certain of the timetable for opening it is, but I imagine the plan is for it to be done for the December timetable changes.

  • Informative/Useful 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

This morning I saw that there are a couple of shelters up. Work is also taking place on the park and ride itself and looks almost ready for surfacing. We have a CRS code, PRI, so it looks like it is to be called Portway Park & Ride, rather than the clumsy Portway Parkway. It has been showing on our diagrams since May and time is allowed for stopping there. That means at the moment we have an extra minutes or so at Shirehampton or Avonmouth.

 

And now a shameless plug. You yourselves can see it for only £2 return from Clifton, or £3 from any station Redland to Temple Meads. I look forward to seeing you.

  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • RMweb Premium
30 minutes ago, Andy Kirkham said:

This thread began eleven years ago with a reflection on the view around the foot of the Temple Meads incline. Well, that view has just undergone a dramatic change as the long-derelict Grosvenor Hotel burned down the other night.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-63310801

How very convenient for the developers.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 6
  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
2 hours ago, The Stationmaster said:

But best rid of it.  it had become pretty awful a good many years back.  So having since lain derelict I doubt it wouild have been worth saving except, possibly as a façade fora new building.

If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's been covered in a false facade for some years now anyway.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, rodent279 said:

If it's the one I'm thinking of, it's been covered in a false facade for some years now anyway.

There is also the George Railway  former railway hotel almost next door, which has had a similar recent history I believe, and also awaits redevelopment.

 

cheers

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...