Indomitable026 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Some photos from Warley IMG_4399.JPG IMG_4400.JPG IMG_4401.JPG IMG_4402.JPG IMG_4387.JPG Very nice. I wonder what the chances are of a 7mm version? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold PaulRhB Posted November 26, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 Many thanks for these photos. Is that the GWR 2-8-0 Night Owl in the background of your second photo, and what is the small tank locomotive 'underneath' in your fourth photo?? John No idea on the 2-8-0 but the locos below are the 1361 and 1366 tanks see the seperate threads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold The Stationmaster Posted November 26, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 26, 2016 No idea on the 2-8-0 but the locos below are the 1361 and 1366 tanks see the seperate threads. It is a GW 47XX Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Y Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold PaulRhB Posted November 28, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 28, 2016 Thanks Andy, they certainly have made a very good job on these. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwardian Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Great pictures and a real treat for those unable to attend Warley, thanks. What stunning locomotives. I have had Yeo on pre-order for sometime. I was expecting great models and these pictures really whet the appetite! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaymzHatstand Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 I was mesmerised by the Waffles in the Heljan case, until someone who obviously thought he was more important decided he needed to be where I was! Andy's studio shots really emphasise how lovely these locos are! I'm glad I've got the two Southern versions on pre-order, I'd best get some crew figures sorted for those nice spacious cabs! Hopefully access to the cab will be pretty easy and non-destructive! Cheers J Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian777999 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Do the lamps work ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold PaulRhB Posted November 29, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 29, 2016 (edited) Do the lamps work ?Doesn't look like it, there's no wiring to the cab rear or smokebox area apparent in the pics I took of the chassis, posted earlier in the thread. The lamps wouldn't be lit in daylight anyway so not really worth the effort for the few running at night. Edited November 29, 2016 by PaulRhB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesg Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 I was also hoping the lamps would work - there's a lot of electronics inside for such a small locomotive. The level of detail is very high though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold PaulRhB Posted November 29, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted November 29, 2016 (edited) Very nice. I wonder what the chances are of a 7mm version? Well they were wary about a 009 version but the pre orders are very high so you never know they might be persuaded in the future. When you see the supposedly niche models Heljan has produced and justified second runs even in multiple liveries, see the Metropolitan Bo Bo's! Edited November 29, 2016 by PaulRhB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDJR7F88 Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 A short video taking a look at the Heljan Stand, during the Warley National Model Railway Exhibition.On show, as well a huge display of current production models, was a number of up and coming and prototypes, including the all 009 L&B Manning Wardle 2-6-2T's, 0 gauge GWR 61xx Large Prairie's, 00 gauge British Rail Class 07's, plus much, much more.Filmed Saturday 26th November 2016, we take a closer look at these new models, plus more. Hope you enjoy! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwMEL_dmQy8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz101 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Nice to see this developing well, and Heljan are to be congratulated. The overall look is good, and I think captures nicely the original. But there is one area that immediately sprung to eye as being somewhat amiss, and that is the application of the livery on the front of the tanks. The lower edge of the lining should be higher, and in line with the lower edge on forward part of the side tanks. The curvature of the underside of the tank here may have something to do with this (is it too large, and thus the lining on the side at all too high?), but the big difference in height really shows to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 (edited) Nice to see this developing well, and Heljan are to be congratulated. The overall look is good, and I think captures nicely the original. But there is one area that immediately sprung to eye as being somewhat amiss, and that is the application of the livery on the front of the tanks. The lower edge of the lining should be higher, and in line with the lower edge on forward part of the side tanks. The curvature of the underside of the tank here may have something to do with this (is it too large, and thus the lining on the side at all too high?), but the big difference in height really shows to me. RM3.jpg Well spotted! However check this one out. The top and bottom horizontals on the tank front DON'T align with the sides. The top is higher and the bottom lower. The outside corners are not rounded and that rounded bottom corner on the model is quite wrong. This all results in the inner, curved side being the wrong shape and the green panel being too small. Bearing in mind that these locos were all hand-painted, there may have been variations in the precise shape and detail of the lining but I can't find a shot that shows the lining as it is on the model - unless that's been taken from the replica loco. Also worth noting that the cab side horizontals below the window are seriously bad - on the real thing! They slope downwards in a manner which would look awful on the model, and have us all complaining. The real thing wasn't always perfect. (CJL) Edited December 6, 2016 by dibber25 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Here's Taw showing exactly the same front end lining as Yeo - square corners and a simple curve around the smokebox with no angled top corner. She matches Yeo pretty exactly, except that her cabside lining is neatly horizontal. This is one of 'Uncle Mac's' shots taken in the last year of operation. (CJL) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
45568 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Please pardon a complete novice to narrow gauge, but... these run on N gauge track, but are to 4mm (OO) scale? Seeking knowledge in Oz, Peter C. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Yes 009 is an established UK gauge/scale combination, that portrays basically a two foot gauge, narrow gauge line, but modellers portray 1foot 6 up to 2.6feet using the same 9mm track. The gauge/scale relationship is deliberately left a bit elastic, as the differences are small in 4mm or H09, the continental version, which has several names. The slightly smaller H0 scale narrow gauge locos and stock are often mixed with 4mm items. The Heljan is nearer a scale 4mm, where the 9mm track portrays 2foot 3inch, instead of the real L&B gauge of 2 foot. Peco's matching L&B coaches and goods stock are 4mm scale to run on 9mm track. Stephen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Indeed the models are 4mm scale on 9mm track, its a slight scale/gauge compromise but allows scratch and kit builders to use N gauge chassis virtually unmodified to represent the narrow gauge system. Its a bit elastic, but tends to be restricted to railways between 1ft11.5 in gauge (Ffestiniog / WHR / L&B) and 2ft 6in (W&LLR, GVR). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Gold PaulRhB Posted December 7, 2016 RMweb Gold Share Posted December 7, 2016 Nice to see this developing well, and Heljan are to be congratulated. The overall look is good, and I think captures nicely the original. But there is one area that immediately sprung to eye as being somewhat amiss, and that is the application of the livery on the front of the tanks. The lower edge of the lining should be higher, and in line with the lower edge on forward part of the side tanks. The curvature of the underside of the tank here may have something to do with this (is it too large, and thus the lining on the side at all too high?), but the big difference in height really shows to me. RM3.jpg I fed this back via Andrew Burnham at Peco a couple of weeks ago when I saw the samples. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No Decorum Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Please pardon a complete novice to narrow gauge, but... these run on N gauge track, but are to 4mm (OO) scale? Seeking knowledge in Oz, Peter C. If you are a novice, I think it worth pointing out that, whilst 009 stock will run on N gauge track and N gauge stock will run on 009 track, the two look a bit different. Sleepers for N gauge depict main line track in N scale. Peco produces two types of 009 track: “crazy track”, which depicts rather haphazardly laid narrow gauge and “main line”, which depicts rather more carefully laid track. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSpencer Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 I've gone and ordered Yeo today and planning has begun for a 00-9 section on the layout. Wise move??? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bertiedog Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 I've gone and ordered Yeo today and planning has begun for a 00-9 section on the layout. Wise move??? Wise indeed, but wallet emptying time is coming soon............. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobby Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 as the differences are small in 4mm or H09, the continental version, which has several names. Would beg to differ. For those of us who have seen the Real Thing the difference between OO and HO scales is quite large. For instance put an HO scale Mini alongside an OO one and you'll see. The reason a lot of HOe scale stock runs on 009 layouts is simply that the HO stock is based on 750/760mm (2ft 6ins) gauge prototypes which are naturally much larger in Real Life than most of the British 2ft and 2ft 3ins prototypes and so the models ends up similar in size to the smaller gauge stock due to the scale difference, same as the HO and OO SG comparison. HO9 was used in the very early days by Egger and Peco I believe, but the standard for Mainland Europe has been HOe for ages or HOn30 in the USA. It is perhaps best to use those two rather than HO9 when looking for anything on the 'Net these days! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coppercap Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) Also worth noting that the cab side horizontals below the window are seriously bad - on the real thing! They slope downwards in a manner which would look awful on the model, and have us all complaining. The real thing wasn't always perfect. (CJL) Wasn't Yeo repainted locally at Pilton not long before closure? Obviously an afternoon job after a few lunchtime ciders! Edited December 8, 2016 by Coppercap Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dibber25 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Wasn't Yeo repainted locally at Pilton not long before closure? Obviously an afternoon job after a few lunchtime ciders! Most work was done locally - even major overhauls I believe. I did once read that the 'SOUTHERN" lettering was hand sign-written because Eastleigh didn't have small enough transfers. Strangely, the sloping line seems to follow some equally sloping rivets! Those who are debating the rivets on the Dean Goods should take a look at the real thing in STEAM. The rivets along the running plate are all over the place - not the neat rows we expect on models! I'm still waiting for someone to produce a Crewe-built 'Western' with the over-stressed skin that's all crumpled! (CJL) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now