Jump to content
 

Aeolus Valve Gear


MikeOxon

1,084 views

Interpreting the Valve Motion

 

At the end of my previous post, I commented on the surprising layout of the valve gear, as shown on the Lane sketches. The Works drawing of the engine, as originally designed, shows a more usual arrangement, with the weigh-bar placed under the boiler behind the smokebox.

 

Following further research, however, I have re-interpreted the drawings of Aeolus by E.T. Lane and have, therefore, revised this post on 16th April.

 

According to the recently published book by Brian Arman: ‘BG Engines – Part 3’, several engines built during the 1840s were fitted with a regulator that was placed immediately above the cylinders. Drawings of, for example, the ‘Prince’ class show that the regulator was operated by levers from a shaft across the front of the smokebox, by means of a control on the right-hand side of the footplate.

 

I had not been happy with my previous thought that these components might have represented a ‘throw back’ to much earlier type of valve gear as used on Stephenson’s ‘Planet’ series of engines. It appears that Gooch started fitting his fixed link expansion gear from 1843, so I now suggest that the rebuilt Aeolus may have been one of the first engines to have been fitted with this gear. Far from being a ‘throw back’, this engine may have a been a test-bed for the new arrangement, which was fitted to Great Western and other engines shortly afterwards.

 

This change of interpretation does not actually affect the design of my model very much, it is simply that the parts that I have modelled serve a different purpose from what I initially had thought. The new interpretation is much more convincing than my earlier thoughts.

 

Initially, I produced every piece of the regulator mechanism as a separate ‘body’, so that I could move them all around independently to what seemed to be the most appropriate positions. The plausible outcome looked as below:

 

1248499142_3D-RegulatorMech.jpg.83e8d0971ba773bd0924198db7dcc7ff.jpg
Potential Layout of regulator mechanism in ‘Fusion 360’

 

The next requirement is to provide supports for all these gubbins and, on this matter, I find the available sketches and drawings very confusing.

 

Lane’s sketches, which were clearly used as the basis of the much later G.F.Bird drawings, show what appears to be a rather massive support structure carrying a shaped boss to hold the transverse shaft, presumably in the centre-line of the locomotive. There is no clear indication of how the outer ends of the shaft were supported. As an interim measure, I decided to add support brackets extending forward from the smokebox, as shown in drawings of  ‘Prince’, but there is no indication of such supports in the Lane sketches. There also seems to be a pillar supporting horizontal bars but with no indication of where these were placed laterally. Was there perhaps a curved rail around the front of the engine?

 

1084184651_Aeolus_GFBird800x600.jpg.a9d55abeccc3eeab2abfa678877e06bf.jpg
20th Century drawing by G.F. Bird, derived from Lane’s sketches

 

 

Another puzzle is provided by those rather splendid curved side-brackets shown on the original Works drawing of ‘Aeolus’. It is not clear whether these were retained when the smaller wheels and consequently lower outside frames, were fitted during re-building. It is also not clear where they appeared along the length of the engine, although the photograph of ‘Vulcan’ suggests they were at the front of the smokebox and rear of the firebox, with intermediate straight supports to the sides of the boiler. Bird seems to have assumed this in his drawing but it not clear on Lane’s sketches.

 

Adding Surface Details

 

One of the pleasures of using 3D modelling tools is the ability to add rows of rivets, either in regular arrays or following a defined path, by using a few keystrokes and the ‘pattern’ commands.

 

For the frames, I drew one rivet and then used the rectangular pattern tool to create a 2 x 36 array for all the rivets on one side and then the Copy command to replicate them on the other side. For the smokebox front, I drew one rivet and then told them to follow a path around the edge of the smokebox – job done! With these additions, my 3D model in ‘Fusion 360’ looks like this:

 

3D-Assembly-14.jpg.5b50f06aa5d9c2ce224a8ace7bc1e696.jpg
Assembly of parts within ‘Fusion 360’

 

Preparation for Printing

 

As I have pointed out before, there is a difference between a 3D model and a printable 3D model.

 

My approach is to break the complete model down into several parts that can be printed individually and then assembled as a ‘kit’. In deciding how to separate the parts, I try to ensure that each part has a flat surface which can be laid on my FDM printer bed. An advantage of this approach is that the print times for individual parts can be quite short so, if some re-design is necessary, it can be done without having to re-print the entire model.

 

Smokebox Front

 

I felt that the most demanding task for my printer would be to reproduce the details on the smokebox front, including the supports for the valve gear. For this reason, I did a test print of this part first, since the overall success of my model depends on how well this region can be represented. After printing, my first trial looked as below (Note that I shall print the weigh bars and levers separately.):

 

SmokeboxFront-dims.jpg.d63e4686691677c5d41a8714f80bd1eb.jpg

My first test 3D print of the Smokebox Front

 

There were a few stray strands of filament that had to be carefully removed with fine tweezers but overall, I was very pleasantly surprised to see how well the details had been rendered, including the supports for the valve gear and the protruding piston rods, etc.

 

Further Components

 

Encouraged by this first trial (which took only 10 mins to print), I continued to select and print the various other components.

 

I have learned to keep the various parts in the form of individual ‘bodies’ within ‘Fusion 360’, so that I keep as many options as possible open for printing. In this case, the front of the smokebox, shown above, is a ‘body’ in its own right, separate from the rest of the smokebox. The back of this part is completely flat, to lie on the printer bed, while the front has some very fine details, including the piston rods and eccentric rods, protruding from the front surface.

 

Most of the other parts are simpler and very similar to the equivalent parts on models that I have constructed before. For example, the boiler, smokebox body, and firebox appeared as below, immediately after printing:

 

1609125643_PrintedComponents-1.jpg.6a782c1a7b5940e57860517bf0d5697d.jpg
My 3D Printed Boiler Components on Printer Bed

 

I am especially pleased with the way the combined dome/safety valve cover has turned out. I printed this in two parts: the fluted barrel and the curvaceous top cover. I provided each part with dowels and mating sockets, so that they plugged together on top of the firebox. After fitting together, the printed parts look like this:

 

1256124947_PrintedDome2.jpg.2f452582bdbd9e3aec3a37941a204683.jpg

My 3D-printed Dome/Safety Valve Cover on Firebox

 

I am reminded of Brunel’s statement in a letter to the engineer T. E. Harrison on 5th March 1838. Forgive the sexist remarks but I am quoting verbatim: “Lastly let me call your attention to the appearance - we have a splendid engine of Stephenson's, it would be a beautiful ornament in the most elegant drawing room and we have another of Quaker-like simplicity carried even to shabbyness but very possibly as good as engine, but the difference in the care bestowed by the engine man, the favour in which it is held by others and even oneself, not to mention the public, is striking. A plain young lady however amiable is apt to be neglected. Now your engine is capable of being made very handsome, and it ought to be so.[MacDermot, History of the GWR]

 

I do think this dome is very handsome and has printed very well!

 

Now, I have all the parts needed to complete the boiler assembly. The major parts all plug together, while the smokebox front is glued to the flat front-face of the smokebox itself. I have not yet attached the weigh-bar and rocking levers, to actuate the valve rods, which can be seen protruding from the front face:

 

PrintedBoilerAssy.jpg.cce20fa4d05c786c38177aa231690b21.jpg

My Model ‘Aeolus’ Boiler

 

This is a good place to pause before embarking on the running gear, which will support these completed parts. That will be my next post.

 

Mike

 

 

 

Edited by MikeOxon
further research

  • Like 5
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
  • Round of applause 1

14 Comments


Recommended Comments

You were quick of the mark with your appreciative response, @Annie, thank you.  When I was looking around for anything that would help me understand the appearance of Aeolus, I noticed that there is a model for 'Trainz'.  Sadly, it bears little resemblance to the engine, in the form that I have built.  Also, I think there is no way that Aeolus could have managed a train of the weight depicted in the Trainz video.

Edited by MikeOxon
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

'Aeolus' was one of Steve Flander's Broad Gauge models that I've never previously downloaded, but after having a look at it just now I can see it's a very basic model indeed.  It's been updated for TS2012, but I think it's older than that and possibly goes back to TS2004 days.  I checked the engine spec and it's the same one that was originally written for Steve's  0-6-0 'Hercules' locomotive so no wonder that it's got more pull than it should have. 

One of the problems with Trainz engine specs is that if they are written exactly according to prototype information they end up being about 20% more powerful than they should be so they have to be creatively nerfed in order to make them realistic performers.  Though that doesn't overcome the problem of a completely wrong engine spec being used.

 

I enjoyed reading your analysis of how 'Aeolus' rebuilt valve gear might have been constructed.  It certainly seems to have been an odd way of doing things.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Interesting as ever. 

 

The front elevation does seem to show bolted brackets at the outer edge of the cylinders to support the weigh bar, so your model does look right to me. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Mike, I'm only seeing the header image and last photo now. Strange that they have not come back as they were posted on Monday.

 

 

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
18 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Mike, I'm only seeing the header image and last photo now. Strange that they have not come back as they were posted on Monday.

 

 

I can see all the photos. Very nice they are too! I hope you recover them soon.

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

That's odd. Just tried on the other laptop and on both Chrome and Edge, no success. 

Link to comment

I'm getting all the images (and it's not because they are in my cache, as I cleared that first thing this morning).

 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

That's odd. Just tried on the other laptop and on both Chrome and Edge, no success. 

I can see them all and the ones in the previous post but, for the rest of my blog posts, there are just one or two, here and there. 

 

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they may come back .  I thought it was just the post 2021 ones that were said to be 'lost' but there's not much at all left on either of my two blogs. 

 

It's left them pretty useless in terms of showing my various methods so, if they show no signs of returning after a few weeks, I shall probably delete the lot.  I think Andy Y is feeling the strain enough, so will not add hassle on him.

 

Mike

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

I'm seeing it as below. Looks just like all the other missing images. I have checked further and get the same result on three different devices on two different networks with different browsers and security software. Strange.

 

I can't see any technical reasons why people outside the UK should be seeing it differently, so it can't be that. I don't suppose there is any clue here for the greater problem (e.g. file names not being accepted). Oh well, beyond my expertise so best not speculate.

 

 

image.png

Edited by Mikkel
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

I'm not seeing the images either.  What I'm seeing is the same as the image you have there Mikkel.

Link to comment

Interesting what you are (not) seeing.  Those texts, similar to what your see, Mikeel and Annie, are all I see through most of my two blogs.  Perhaps other people are seeing more of those than I do?  What a mess :(

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Mikkel said:

I can't see any technical reasons why people outside the UK should be seeing it differently, so it can't be that. I don't suppose there is any clue here for the greater problem (e.g. file names not being accepted). Oh well, beyond my expertise so best not speculate.

I've just found that some images which I can see in the post, disappear when I click on them with a message:

 

This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>
<RequestId>R4FCBHHG5D0N7FMB</RequestId>
<HostId>
upRfW0q2vDelYlH5gOmy0CLlfBDOevxlLBjaKM+AhjcI14Lk8iajbIk/TCW7lJcK/lNQcP2ZhGg=
</HostId>
</Error>

 

Some other images open as expected.  Perhaps, to someone more knowledgeable, this is a clue to what is happening?

 

Mike

Edited by MikeOxon
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment

I've been getting the same problem with most of my blogs and forum posts :

 

It might be best to let the system settle down a little longer, to remedy, click on 'edit' and then re-upload or just re--attach your  images, I've got some post's were this has happened three times. I do wonder if multiple images might end up in the database without links to documents.

 

Snitzl

Edited by snitzl
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, snitzl said:

I've been getting the same problem with most of my blogs and forum posts :

I have tried re-loading the images into my 'Bodies and Components' post.  That wasn't difficult but it then takes time to position them all into their correct locations within the post.  There are 80 posts in this blog and many more in my 'Pre-Grouping' blog so re-entering them all is not a task to be undertaken lightly!  I shall wait a few weeks and see if there is any improvement but, since most of these posts are somewhat meaningless without the images, I shall probably simply delete them, if the situation has not changed.

  • Agree 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...