Jump to content
 

My Atmospheric Caper - Part 1


MikeOxon

710 views

Introduction

 

Having worked my way back to the very beginnings of the GWR, it’s been hard to think of where to go next. I’ve enjoyed exploring those odd-ball engines that Brunel ordered for his new concept of a railway, even though they proved to be disastrously undersized. Nevertheless, several of them had quite long lives as branch-line engines.

 

I do enjoy ‘bringing to life’ forgotten areas of railway history and, for the broad gauge, the ultimate in odd-ball ideas was, perhaps, the atmospheric railway that Brunel decided to recommend for the South Devon Railway.

 

Dawlish_NicholasCondy800x600.jpg.aac3e13e2c8aa12d5243776ce4bd3340.jpg

Atmospheric Railway showing Pipe and Pumping Station at Dawlish
by Nicholas Condy (1793-1857)

 

The basic idea was to move things along a pipe by evacuating air from the pipe ahead of the vehicle, so that atmospheric pressure would push from behind. This concept found some long-lived applications in shops and other businesses, where it was used to carry paperwork and cash in small canisters around a building.

 

In 1840, two engineers, Clegg and Samuda, laid out a half-mile long track at Wormwood Scrubs, where railway carriages were drawn along by a piston, placed within an evacuated iron pipe set between the running rails. Several engineers were invited to view the demonstration and, whereas Stephenson dismissed it as a ‘great humbug’, Brunel was captivated and went on to propose it for use on the South Devon Railway.

 

He wasn’t alone and the idea was adopted by a few other railways, including the Nanterre to St Germain railway in France. The first to be built, in 1843, was the Kingstown & Dalkey Railway, on the outskirts of Dublin. It was only one and three-quarter miles long and the atmospheric system was used to take trains up an incline, from which they returned by gravity. A trial was also made on a 5-mile stretch of the London, Croydon & Epsom Railway, authorized in 1844 and opened in January 1846. Many problems were encountered and in May 1847 the whole line was converted to locomotive operation.

 

Typically, Brunel’s plans were more grandiose. On Brunel’s recommendation, the South Devon Railway laid fifteen miles of single track from Exeter St David’s to Teignmouth, later extended by a further five miles to Newton Abbot. The intention was to apply the atmospheric system all the way to Plymouth, so Brunel allowed some unusually steep gradients along his surveyed route, on the assumption that they would be operated by atmospheric traction ... but matters never got that far!

 

Atmospheric operation of the line was very short-lived: public operation began on 13th September 1847 and within the year it was all over!.  The last atmospheric train arrived at Exeter during the night of 9/10 September 1848. This isn’t the place to go into all the reasons for such a catastrophic failure – suffice to say that the multiple reasons were both technical and economic in nature.

 

Misconceptions

 

So why do I want to make a model? My main reason is that there are serious misconceptions about what the railway actually looked like. A lot of credence was given to images based on Clegg and Samuda’s Patent Application, which actually bear very little resemblance to what was actually built. The illustrations were only intended to indicate the principles of operation, as shown below.

 

AtmosphericSystem.jpg.0cac2f378d145388e3c10d3d2a499684.jpg

Schematic diagram from Samuda and Clegg’s Patent on atmospheric railway. 

 

Unfortunately, a commercial artist and writer, Robert Barnard Way, active from 1930 to 1958 created an atmospheric railway scene based on Nicholas Condy's painting of Dawlish (above), with the addition of a train headed by a simple flat car, as shown in the Patent diagram. There are now a great many copies of this image in circulation, so I shall avoid perpetrating this error.

 

A true description of the piston carriage used on the SDR came to light during a meeting of the Broad Gauge Society (BGS), held at Bristol Museum in 1993. There was an opportunity while they were there to browse through the Woodfin Collection, where some BGS members were astonished to discover a real bombshell. Negatives 14471, 14894-14896 and 16141-16150 actually recorded drawings of one of the elusive South Devon Railway piston carriages. Paul Garnsworthy of the BGS created new drawings from the rather faded images and published a pair of articles, including his drawings, in the BGS Journal ‘Broadsheet’ issues 44 and 46. (available to BGS members in digital format)

 

In order to set the record straight, I decided to create a model based on these drawings, using my usual methods of extruding from drawings by means of ‘Fusion 360’ software.

 

Creating my Model

 

The first step was to import the drawings from ‘Broadsheet’ as a ‘canvas’ in ‘Fusion 360’. After scaling to 4mm/foot, I copied the main outlines of the sides and ends, before adding details of doors, windows, and panelling. All these were created by means of the ‘rectangle’ and ‘3-point arc’ drawing tools

 

3D-model_carriageSide.jpg.87a9346f1e1b4b2281ef33eed407cd53.jpg

My sketches of the carriage side overlaid on the ‘canvas’

 

I then used the ‘push-pull’ tool to raise the mouldings above the main extrusion of the side, to create a solid model.

 

The ends of the carriage were created in exactly the same way from the appropriate drawings. The sides and ends were all created as separate ‘bodies’ within ‘Fusion 360’.

 

The floor was created as a simple rectangle and the roof was similar except for an arc profile. I added two oil lamp housings to the roof, placed to be shared between the 2nd and 3rd class compartments, This was a common practice in the early days, when any sort of lighting was considered a ‘luxury’!

 

Once all the parts were extruded, I created a rendered image of the complete assembly in ‘Fusion 360’. The colour of these carriages is unknown. Brown was the standard colour used on both the GWR and the SDR but there is evidence that at least some 2nd class SDR carriages were painted green. I decided to use green, simply to provide a contrast to my usual stock.

 

Accommodation in the prototype comprised two 2nd class compartments towards each end and a central area for 3rd class passengers. The piston carriage was designed to be bi-directional and was not turned at the end of a journey. Because much of the SDR line ran along the coast, the two sides can be referred to as the ‘seaward’ and ‘landward’ sides. Brakes were only fitted on the landward side so the driving position was offset to this side at both ends of the carriage.

 

3D-model_carriagebody.jpg.a5c51cf91150db8c6ac5190ae394e9d0.jpg
my rendered piston-carriage body created in Fusion 360

 

For printing, I divided the components into just four parts – 2 sides, roof, and a floor combined with ends and partitions.

 

3D-model_carriagecomponents..jpg.1656e9628249cbab1727f3900d4a544d.jpg
The four components ready for ‘slicing’ and printing.

 

This division into components allowed me to lay the sides flat on the printer bad, so that there was no need to provide additional support to the window openings. The roof is flat on the underside and the other parts are printed from the floor upwards. I could separate the ends, if this proved necessary to achieve clear window openings but, in practice, I have found that my printer copes well with small simple rectangular openings like these.

 

Printing my Model

 

The printing all went smoothly, including the floor and partitions, where I had hoped that the window openings would print reasonably cleanly without additional supports. There is a little stringing visible (I used the Geeetech printer) but nothing to cause any difficulty.

 

3D-print_floorends.jpg.bf4650484e50c559600ffddefb465084.jpg
Floor and Partitions on Geeetech E-180 printer bed

 

I then printed the two sides and the roof, which included two oil-lamp housings, shared between adjacent compartments. I continue to be amazed by what my printer can achieve. In this case, I could see light through the small holes in the lamp covers that I had included in the 3D model,.

 

3D-print_PistonCarr.jpg.b7943d33c6b3bf1e52f2e0352152a338.jpg

My 3D-printed Piston Carriage Body with oil-lamp housings

 

Of course, this was just a straight-forward carriage design. I now have to tackle the underframe, with its attachments to the atmospheric pistons. On the prototype, these were pivoted such that they could be raised if the carriage had to pass over crossings in ‘ordinary’ track.

 

I intend to represent them in the raised position or, if I can manage to do so, I may even make them hinged! I anticipate that creating them, such that they can be 3D-printed, will be a challenge and I suspect that some ‘hybrid’ construction methods will be necessary.

 

Mike

 

Feature Photo: watercolour by William Dawson (1790-1877) - "view of Newton station, via Brunel's Atmospheric Railway"

Edited by MikeOxon

  • Like 10
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 5
  • Round of applause 2

12 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

I remember the vacuum systems in shops, brass cans that twisted open and had a felt pad at the ends.

 

The coach body looks a good print. It will be interesting to see the running gear, I have often wondered how it worked in practice. 

Link to comment
47 minutes ago, Dave John said:

I have often wondered how it worked in practice. 

I've been on a steep learning curve and intend to write about it in Part 2.  The truth is that it didn't work well in practice and not just because the appropriate materials weren't available.  There were just so many shortcomings, when it came to adapting the idea to railway operations.  No points, no cross-overs, and very little control for the 'driver' of the train.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

@MikeOxon "it was used to carry paperwork and cash in small canisters around a building." ("quote selection" not working)

 

Not just a building: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_pneumatic_post  "The Paris pneumatic post reached its greatest extent in 1934 with 427 kilometres (265 mi) of pneumatic pipes and 130 offices in service". 

 

I'll look forward to seeing this model and thread develop.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by kitpw
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted (edited)

Using models to set history right, I like that very much. And as always done very well.

 

The discovery of the negatives showing the drawings must have been quite something for the BGS members. A day to remember!

 

Edited by Mikkel
Link to comment

I like to try and correct 'fake news' 😄  I agrrr that it must have been an exciting day for the BGS.  I suspect there are quite a few followers of the 19th century GWR who hope that some drawings of the semi-mythical 4-2-4T No.9 will eventually turn up somewhere.

 

Mike

  • Like 1
Link to comment

A brilliant project. Looking forward to watching how this progresses. Will you be bold and try and replicate the means of propulsion too!? I imagine it could be achievable in a model.

 

Did they have freight on the Atmospheric railway too? The fact Brunel managed to persuade the powers that be to endorse this scheme shows what a great politician he must have been, as well as a tremendous innovator. I wonder what other treats are hidden away in the archives!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Thank you for such an enthusiastic response, Crompton.  I have though about propulsion, possibly by using a magnet to connect the car to the piston, but my current problem is to create a model of the apparatus under the car!

 

The did run goods trains and the last one to run was in fact a goods train to Exeter.  The late Eddy Brown, who contributed so much research to the BGS, made a drawing of a goods train, which can be seen in 'Broadsheet' no.44 (Autumn 2000).

 

Brunel certainly had great powers of persuasion.  He frequently managed to convince otherwise staid bankers to support his idealistic schemes.  He always seemed to have a blind spot concerning railway engines, though, since his specifications for steam locomotives were disastrous when implemented.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

A really significant problem with the principle of the atmospheric railway is that the force available to move the train is limited to something less than one atmosphere times the surface area of the piston. I've no idea if the technology of the day would have coped any better with a positive pressure system! (Which, in principle, would have the same advantage as that of air brakes over vacuum brakes.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

A really significant problem with the principle of the atmospheric railway is that the force available to move the train is limited to something less than one atmosphere times the surface area of the piston. I've no idea if the technology of the day would have coped any better with a positive pressure system! (Which, in principle, would have the same advantage as that of air brakes over vacuum brakes.)

 

Or a high pressure steam engine over a Newcomen engine?

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, Dunalastair said:

Or a high pressure steam engine over a Newcomen engine?

 

But the limit remains the same - the maximum differential pressure across the piston is one atmosphere - in practice rather less. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
2 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

A really significant problem with the principle of the atmospheric railway is that the force available to move the train is limited to something less than one atmosphere times the surface area of the piston. I've no idea if the technology of the day would have coped any better with a positive pressure system! (Which, in principle, would have the same advantage as that of air brakes over vacuum brakes.)

Positive pressure would have been a lot more problematical.

 

One of the key problems was how to seal the slot in the tube. With negative pressure, you need the tube to be sealed in front of the train, which ought to be a plausible proposition, and you aren't much concerned with what happens after the train has passed till you need to create a vacuum for the next train. The flaps stick upwards (were they made of leather?) and it ought to be possible to contrive it so they naturally fell together. Perhaps lengthsmen were stationed at intervals to push the flaps together wherever there was a leak.

 

With positive pressure, you need the tube to be sealed behind the train, which is a lot harder with the blade just having passed through the slot. The flaps need to face downwards into the tube, where they risked getting in the way of the piston, or have bits break off, and I am not sure how you could reasonably contrive it so that compressed air would push them together rather than create a hole to escape. If there were a leak, I am not sure how a lengthsman could remedy it, since the flaps they needed to pull together were inside the tube.

 

Edit: I posted this before reading Part 2, where Mike describes how the tube was sealed in detail. It would be possible to configure rollers to close the flap of a positive pressure system before the rear piston passed through the tube, but surely there would be too great a risk of bits of the flap breaking off and falling into the tube. Furthermore, repairing the flap would be a lot harder with it being inside the tube rather than outside.

Edited by Jeremy Cumberland
  • Agree 2
Link to comment

I shall watch this with interest. What a wonderful idea to model this system. My modest knowledge is limited to the Croydon line and perhaps more, the proposed Portsmouth Atmospheric line.

Thank-you for your content so far.

Peter

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...