Jump to content
Users will currently see a stripped down version of the site until an advertising issue is fixed. If you are seeing any suspect adverts please go to the bottom of the page and click on Themes and select IPS Default. ×
RMweb
 

Stoke Courtenay


checkrail

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium
17 minutes ago, MrWolf said:

I'm a big believer in the six degrees of separation, it works with just about anything.

Yes, Brisbane is about 6 degrees north of Sydney, which is just about far enough away...

  • Round of applause 1
  • Funny 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
12 hours ago, MrWolf said:

I suspect that is the same article which I read in an old magazine sometime in the early 1980s.

A discussion about that article and a conspiracy with a friend on here resulted in two of these making an appearance.

Forgive my ignorance but what was the prototype?  An absorbed loco?  (There was a long period in the 70s and 80s when I didn't see model railway mags so I don't recall Wing Commander Huxley and his work.)

  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, checkrail said:

Forgive my ignorance but what was the prototype?  An absorbed loco?  (There was a long period in the 70s and 80s when I didn't see model railway mags so I don't recall Wing Commander Huxley and his work.)

Yes, I believe that is one of the M&SWJR tanks.   Been talk about it in the pugbash thread.   That line had some attractive power.   Their Fairlie was gone before 1900, though, so no Swindon Fairlie.

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, checkrail said:

Forgive my ignorance but what was the prototype?  An absorbed loco?  (There was a long period in the 70s and 80s when I didn't see model railway mags so I don't recall Wing Commander Huxley and his work.)

 

It was originally M&SWJR Number 15, a Beyer Peacock 0-4-4 of a type that seems to have been built for overseas and colonial work. I found a picture of two headed for Cairo. They had a couple of strange small wheeled 2-6-0 tender engines too which were originally headed for South America, one of which was Swindonised and served on into the 30s.

  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get told off for having too many GWR cattle wagons and not enough from other of the big four. They are/were right. I dug out several 1930#s shots of cattle trains and there are a mix of all companies. I have put that right now. Several Geen kits, K's LMS, Parkside NE and I am away. I even have an ex Scottish cattle wagon from obscure cast parts donated to the cause.

 

I reread the Huxley cattle wagon article last night (RM August 78 if you have a Modeller subscription and can access through the online archive) and it shows W1/W5 conversions. Although Brian is altering the Airfix, the same techniques can be used to correct the Coopercraft end profile.

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Informative/Useful 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
28 minutes ago, Graham T said:

I quite like the Bachmann ones, although I've no idea how accurate they are (not that that matters too much for Chuffnell R to be honest).

 

 

I do believe the model is a scale foot too long but it never stopped me from buying several.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 4
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
5 hours ago, MrWolf said:

 

If it's Sydney avoidance you're after, Perth may be a better bet, or Albany even?

Brisbane avoidance, dear boy!

 

The furthest town from Sydney in mainland Australia is, I believe, Exmouth WA.

  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Graham T said:

I quite like the Bachmann ones, although I've no idea how accurate they are (not that that matters too much for Chuffnell R to be honest).

 

 

The Bachmann one is based on the BR standard design; however, it has one major flaw - it is 4mm too long. Shame really as it is a lovely model otherwise. 

 

I think Geoff Kent wrote a piece in one of his books about adapting the Coopercraft W1/5 kit into one of the more modern variants. 

 

All the best,

 

Nick.

  • Like 3
  • Informative/Useful 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
55 minutes ago, Brinkly said:

 

The Bachmann one is based on the BR standard design;

 

I thought it was based on the W12, which the BR one was later based on.

  • Agree 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
9 hours ago, 57xx said:

 

I thought it was based on the W12, which the BR one was later based on.


Morning Ric,

 

It might well be to be fair. I just remember back in 2010 it arriving and everyone being delighted till someone ran a ruler over it! 
 

Looking in the Atkins book it is incredibly similar to a W12, but it’s still 4mm too long - if the W12 is 18’ -6” over the headstocks.
 

The end panels on the Bachmann model are 2mm too long. It also rides on BR w-irons not RCH one: very picky of me I know! 
 

I was always under the impression Bachmann sold it as ‘BR standard’ and then applied GWR branding. 
 

Warren Shepherd does produce a W12 kit in etched form. I haven’t built one myself but it does look good. 
 

If you can overlook it being too long, then it’s a very useful addition to a wagon fleet, but I found running them along side the Airfix kit, they just looked very odd! Similar to the old Mainline LMS vans compared to the Parkside kit - the Mainline/Bachmann model being 4mm too short! 
 

Run and even number of both in a train mind, and it would still be the right length! 
 

All the best,

 

Nick. 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 5
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
54 minutes ago, Brinkly said:

Warren Shepherd does produce a W12 kit in etched form. I haven’t built one myself but it does look good. 

It makes for a very nice model, I have built one so far (with another on the bench to build.  I have also built a W12 using the Airfix kit as a basis (and a lot of work) I had planed to build a couple more before Warren's kit appeared.

  • Informative/Useful 4
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
8 hours ago, Brinkly said:


Morning Ric,

 

It might well be to be fair. I just remember back in 2010 it arriving and everyone being delighted till someone ran a ruler over it! 
 

Looking in the Atkins book it is incredibly similar to a W12, but it’s still 4mm too long - if the W12 is 18’ -6” over the headstocks.
 

The end panels on the Bachmann model are 2mm too long. It also rides on BR w-irons not RCH one: very picky of me I know! 
 

I was always under the impression Bachmann sold it as ‘BR standard’ and then applied GWR branding. 
 

Warren Shepherd does produce a W12 kit in etched form. I haven’t built one myself but it does look good. 
 

If you can overlook it being too long, then it’s a very useful addition to a wagon fleet, but I found running them along side the Airfix kit, they just looked very odd! Similar to the old Mainline LMS vans compared to the Parkside kit - the Mainline/Bachmann model being 4mm too short! 
 

Run and even number of both in a train mind, and it would still be the right length! 
 

All the best,

 

Nick. 

 

Hi Nick,

Leaving the over-length aside, that is a given either way, looking at the underframe, I hadn't noticed the W irons being wrong (not picky, it's good observation!). Now you've got my attention there, I can see the axleboxes look wrong for a W12 too so I erring on your statement of it being based on the BR version to be  true. I'm not sure what they're supposed to be but look neither like RCH or GWR OK boxes.

Edited by 57xx
  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
3 hours ago, 57xx said:

 

Hi Nick,

Leaving the over-length aside, that is a given either way, looking at the underframe, I hadn't noticed the W irons being wrong (not picky, it's good observation!). Now you've got my attention there, I can see the axleboxes look wrong for a W12 too so I erring on your statement of it being based on the BR version to be  true. I'm not sure what they're supposed to be but look neither like RCH or GWR OK boxes.


A bit of a ‘lash-up’ as my old man would say! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MrWolf said:

On a related matter, as the cattle wagons I have to build up are ancient kits, what is actually wrong with the ends on the Cooper Craft W1/W5?

Roof profile is wrong. Should be flatter. It can be corrected by altering the radius but you lose the frame detail at the top. I managed to replace with microstrip rivetted with a track pin, but not as crisp as the tooled ones. Saying that it is hidden by the roof lip. Making a new thinner roof makes a big difference. I out out from a food tin (cheaper than buying a sheet of brass). It is also a bit narrow but that is not really noticeable. The kit represents a later version with the bottom slat filled in over the brake handle. This was after staff complaints having to touch a "soiled" brake lever.

 

Mike Wiltshire

  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Brinkly said:

 

The Bachmann one is based on the BR standard design; however, it has one major flaw - it is 4mm too long. Shame really as it is a lovely model otherwise. 

 

I think Geoff Kent wrote a piece in one of his books about adapting the Coopercraft W1/5 kit into one of the more modern variants. 

 

All the best,

 

Nick.

 

I'm no expert or masochist in these matters and for reasons forgotten, I settled on buying a couple of Dapol Cattle wagons (4F-020-037) which for some reason haven't entered into the conversation here.

 

How are these considered? They look good to my eye, only issue I found being getting inside to install weights and stock.

Edited by BWsTrains
typo
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Coach bogie said:

Roof profile is wrong. Should be flatter. It can be corrected by altering the radius but you lose the frame detail at the top. I managed to replace with microstrip rivetted with a track pin, but not as crisp as the tooled ones. Saying that it is hidden by the roof lip. Making a new thinner roof makes a big difference. I out out from a food tin (cheaper than buying a sheet of brass). It is also a bit narrow but that is not really noticeable. The kit represents a later version with the bottom slat filled in over the brake handle. This was after staff complaints having to touch a "soiled" brake lever.

 

Mike Wiltshire

 

Thanks for the information, I might just replace the rooves if I can tackle the strapping issues neatly. I've got a couple of broken MINK wagons I can practice on.

ISTR reading about the filling in of the vent /washing out slot over the brake levers.

I can imagine that being a problem, cow or sheep muck is a tolerable nuisance, it wipes off, but pig muck follows you around all day, unless you can have a proper wash and if you get it (or any of the others) on the clothes you're spending 12 or more hours in.... Bleh.

  • Like 1
  • Friendly/supportive 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading David Tisdale's article on creating a much earlier short wheelbase cattle wagon with an overall length of about 14 feet from a Cooper Craft item on a 9ft WB chassis. I can't remember what diagram number it was, but there's a drawing in J. Russell's book on GW wagons.

 

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...