Jump to content
 

Hills of the North - The Last Great Project


LNER4479
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, LNER4479 said:

Yes, that's 92167, one of the 3 stoker fitted examples. They were initially allocated to Saltley depot (from 1958) for use on the 'famous' through fitted goods service from Washwood Heath to Carlisle via the S&C, a long standing ex-MR institution. That was always Saltley's 'top link' job, the crews lodging at Carlisle. It was Black 5s, prior to that date. I was aware of the use of 9Fs on this service but again, a late 1950s scenario.

 

 

Terry Essery recounts his experience with mechanical stoker fitted 9Fs in "Saltley Firing Days", including one trip where he had to fire by hand around the apparatus after it failed.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 30851 said:

 

Edit to add - the RCTS book on the 9F's says 92015-7 and 92161/2 were allocated to Newton Heath in June 58 and used on fitted freights from Manchester to Carlisle via the Settle and Carlisle route.

 

Rob

The Newton Heath allocation of 9Fs were seen on a fairly regular basis working through Preston on the WCML, but those workings, and their appearances on Summer dated excursion trains to the Fylde Coast, was pretty much all we saw of them circa 1960.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold
6 hours ago, 30851 said:

 

Seems 92023 (a Crosti) and 92050 were allocated (for a month) to Kingmoor in 1955. There were there for tests - no clue what tests though.

 

Edit to add - the RCTS book on the 9F's says 92015-7 and 92161/2 were allocated to Newton Heath in June 58 and used on fitted freights from Manchester to Carlisle via the Settle and Carlisle route.

 

Rob

 

On further research in the RCTS book 92023 and 92050 were on tests going north to Kilmarnock. The tests were to compare the standard 9F with a Crosti version. These were road trails after tests in the Rugby Testing Station. The test trains consisted of 600 tons of empty passenger stock - which sounds like an expensive train to model!

 

But there was another road trail with 92013 between Skipton and Carlisle in September/October 1954. This was a shorter train but would be unique as it consisted of a Dynamometer car and Mobile Test Units.

 

Crewe did send them north for testing on completion. But I don't know how far north.

 

Other than that it seems 9F's didn't start appearing in general use until 1958 when they started to run on the Settle and Carlisle. 

 

Rob

 

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The lack of 9Fs suggests enough 8Fs of the 2-8-0 and Super D variety?  Had a look at shed allocations and Carlisle seemed light of Super Ds, but there were some at Preston.  You must have something LNWR on the layout…. :-)

 

regards

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can ascertain, the traffic pattern was such that it was the faster-moving, partially or fully fitted goods traffic that was concentrated on the Shap route, with the slower moving stuff routed over the S&C - where necessary, using the now lost Wigan-Chorley-Blackburn link. Consequently, Black 5s (supplemented by occasional 5XPs) were far more common on the Shap route than 8Fs, as has already been alluded to.

 

It was Shap bank itself that led to operating restrictions, a max 15 unbraked wagons being allowed without a banker. And slowing moving trains held up the faster, more prestigious traffic in any case. Not so over the S&C, where there was no banking, fewer prestige trains and where an 8F was good for a prolonged 25mph slog up the 'long drag'. There were some faster goods traffic over the S&C (eg the Washwood Heath working already quoted) but not as much as over Shap.

 

Happy for the above to be corrected / clarified - do bear in mind that it is the 1950s I'm focused on.

Edited by LNER4479
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Informative/Useful 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Friendly/supportive 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
3 hours ago, philip-griffiths said:

The lack of 9Fs suggests enough 8Fs of the 2-8-0 and Super D variety?  Had a look at shed allocations and Carlisle seemed light of Super Ds, but there were some at Preston.

 

Super Ds - Class G2 - were 7F. Apologies if that is to the chagrin of LNWR enthusiasts!

  • Agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

 

Super Ds - Class G2 - were 7F. Apologies if that is to the chagrin of LNWR enthusiasts!

 

Not at all. The fact that a design based derived from locomotives produced in the very early 1900s and which lasted well into BR days is something to applaud.

  • Like 4
  • Agree 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

 

Super Ds - Class G2 - were 7F. Apologies if that is to the chagrin of LNWR enthusiasts!

Conspiracy by derby men to make their locomotives come across as more powerful than they really were…….  🤣 

 

Interest insight about the main line and keeping the slow traffic off it, thanks very much.  Of course you could have a set of locomotives, carriages and wagons to back date Shap to LNWR days…, would make an interesting change..  But I think you’ve got your hands full modelling the 1950s…

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
40 minutes ago, philip-griffiths said:

Conspiracy by derby men to make their locomotives come across as more powerful than they really were…….  🤣 

 

Not at all - the Austin Sevens were 7F, and they were Derbyised G2s. It took an ex-GW man to get us up to Eight. 

  • Like 1
  • Round of applause 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jol Wilkinson said:

Not at all. The fact that a design based derived from locomotives produced in the very early 1900s and which lasted well into BR days is something to applaud.

 

True; but at least back then the pace of technology change was much slower.....  

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BWsTrains said:

at least back then the pace of technology change was much slower.....  

 

Or were people and organisations content with "if it works, why break it?" .

 

Compare to the current need for constant change/ "innovation" and not letting change bed in before the next change starts. 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great photo @46256 - thanks!

 

That departure time (which is entirely logical) would account for why any pictures of the train on the S&C are always southbound. I would surmise a similar departure time from Carlisle for the return working, hence early evening pictures of the Up train on the S&C.

 

I can see that 45268 was a Saltley ever-present throughout the 1950s. So, perhaps I'll number one of my Black 5s accordingly - and have the 9F for the other half of the lodging turn, then everyone's happy 🙂

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium
13 hours ago, philip-griffiths said:

Conspiracy by derby men to make their locomotives come across as more powerful than they really were…….  🤣 

 

Interest insight about the main line and keeping the slow traffic off it, thanks very much.  Of course you could have a set of locomotives, carriages and wagons to back date Shap to LNWR days…, would make an interesting change..  But I think you’ve got your hands full modelling the 1950s…

The layout has  an interesting source of LNWR locos  available.. its the wagons and coaches which would be a problem..

 

Baz

  • Like 3
  • Friendly/supportive 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall a similar picture in the book From the Footplate, the route of the Devonian . I have the book but is in store pending house move. If I recall it has one of the Saltley trio of 9fs in the same spot as the black five awaiting departure . I’ve just been reading an entry, on another blog, by an ex Saltley footplate crew member. In diesel days a class 45 or 25 was rostered. There were two trains daily,  booking on at 0300 hrs to staff the 03 50 departure from Water Orton. The second 15 00 for 1545 departure, arriving at Carlisle at 23 40. The departure from Carlisle was 16 03 arriving at Washwood heath at 23 33 hrs. 

Edited by 46256
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe this may be the class 25 working mentioned. I’ve tried to work out the four figure headcode 

 

4 fast freight

S scotland

 

67 train number.

In any event on the fast lines at Water Orton heading towards Derby and North East

19F215A4-56E7-4426-8C36-A82E373FEE21.jpeg

Edited by 46256
  • Like 6
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Whilst locomotive depot allocations are undoubtedly a valuable indicator of what might have operated where and when, for those not aware there is another resource available that pools train spotters notes of the loco’s that were logged at a particular shed on a specific day.  The shedbashuk website therefore gives a useful indication of how far some locos travelled from their home shed, and where they were turned and serviced at the far end of their runs.
 

www.shedbashuk.blogspot.com

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chamby said:

Whilst locomotive depot allocations are undoubtedly a valuable indicator of what might have operated where and when, for those not aware there is another resource available that pools train spotters notes of the loco’s that were logged at a particular shed on a specific day.  The shedbashuk website therefore gives a useful indication of how far some locos travelled from their home shed, and where they were turned and serviced at the far end of their runs.
 

www.shedbashuk.blogspot.com

 

 

That's really interesting and useful, thank you.

 

Looking at the shed of my RMWeb username, it shows both 9F's and WD's on dates in the 1960's. Plenty of 8F's and ex-LNWR G2's as I would have expected.

 

I have numerous reference book photographs of the area but apart from a polished up 9F on a railtour on the Shropshire Union Line, I've no other picture reference of those types in the area.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...