Jump to content
 

Grantham - the Streamliner years


LNER4479
 Share

Recommended Posts

Well so far there are contacts in Sydney, Adelaide and I can throw my hat in the ring for Melbourne, between, Andrew, Jesse and I you have south east Australia contacts! If your through Melbourne be in touch and we can arrange contact with BRMA meetings and see some interesting stay at home layouts!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A close shave...

 

post-16151-0-93587400-1508497624_thumb.jpg

Been dreading this moment. Turned up at the van hire garage this morning to find that my booking for a 'LWB Transit' resulted in the Vauxhall equivalent of a Ford. Very nice vehicle - but not a Ford Transit.

 

Members of the Grantham show team will appreciate the significance of this as the packing arrangements are down to a finest of millimetres in places with a carefully-rehearsed packing sequence. Guess what? A Vauxhall thingy is NOT the same dimensions internally as a Ford Transit (principally, it seems to be about 6 inches shorter in length).

 

But with the patient assistance from Tom D of this parish, we eventually worked out an alternative packing sequence and all is well. :dancer: Phew! Might even adopt it for future shows as it's actually better in some respects...?

 

See you over the weekend if you're able to attend. Otherwise, I'll try and remember to take a few pictures ;)

 

[Edit 'cos it initially showed picture rotated 90deg to landscape. Anyone else notice that with iPhone pix? They seem to be so elongated that the software insists on turning the round 90deg. Solution is to crop top and bottom slightly - unless anyone knows more elegant way?]

Edited by LNER4479
Link to post
Share on other sites

And it's only a good two years since my original intended date for having the livery finished on the streamlined P2 in that final picture. I must set more realistic targets in future!

 

What a very pleasant show it was. Amazing how well the layout ran after more than seven months in pieces, and we even managed to stay reasonably relaxed, organised and civil on the operating side, as far as I could tell. Could we be in danger of becoming good at the job?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Top photo is the up 'Scotsman' - I forget what move that is, but I remember putting the dirty silver A4 onto it just before close of play on Saturday.

 

I think Lord President is on the 13:40 York/Newcastle/Ripon  - that's a heavy train which is usually a Cock duty.  The meat/fish is still in the loop to the right, so we're in the early part of the sequence.  The leading brake seems to have a flat, or something very heavy has been loaded in the van section.  I must have a look at that.

 

Though I built it all, I do like the 'almost but not quite uniform' profile of the stock down the Scotch Goods behind Tony's V2.  That kind of small variation in stock makes a train look much more interesting than a rake of 15 Bachmann (or Parkside) vans.  Both the V2s I was able to deploy, the other being a GK resin version, are just as capable as their prototypes.

 

We see the B16 and meat/fish train again - I like this view across to the maltings and goods sidings.

 

The last shot really deserves an explanation from Mr. King as it was he who channelled Henry Ivatt's fevered imagination.

Edited by jwealleans
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the camera playing tricks on the P2 photo, the Tender and Platform Roof behind the P2 is a bit wayward too. Lovely pictures and stock .

Thanks Mick,

 

The camera is not playing tricks at all. What's probably happened is the P2 has been reversed for the photograph, thus pushing the tender slightly out of line. The leading carriage (built by whom, I don't know; Jonathan?) is not level either; again, probably caused by the train being reversed. This sort of thing is always highlighted in 'perspective' shots, and is not usually noticed by the naked eye. The roof is askew, as is the station nameboard, but the atmosphere is all there, I hope. 

 

Cameras being blamed for 'banana-shaped' carriages is a common excuse given by those who run 'banana-shaped' trains. If railway vehicles are 'wayward' in pictures, it's because (unless the lens is a fish-eye type) they are in reality.  

Edited by Tony Wright
Link to post
Share on other sites

Something is certainly amiss in that P2 photo. The K2 in the bay platform also seems to be sitting "on the slosh" compared to its pony truck's axle. I'm not sure if that loco is the one that spat its valve gear out on the Sunday and received emergency surgery. If it is the same one, the problems may be related.

 

Here's another picture of the same P2, but not of Sir's quality and not in such tight perspective, but it too suggests that either the tender may be slightly nose-down, or that the loco has cab-droop, assuming that the track is level and straight. I've never suspected a significant problem until now, but I'll look again at the loco on a flat surface with a very critical eye.

 

post-3445-0-74862000-1508782869_thumb.jpg

 

3016 is mostly put together from resin parts intended for K2 construction and a somewhat altered Bachmann V3 chassis. It represents an imagined Gresley pre-group 2-cylinder simple expansion re-build of a four-cylinder compound that Ivatt genuinely proposed for fast goods traffic. It would have used the large Atlantic boiler. In the end the Great Northern went for the cheaper-to-build larger-wheeled 0-6-0s of what became classes J1 and J2. That decision may not have boiled down just to penny pinching as the claimed fuel and water saving advantages for compounding were not at all decisive in the few compound Atlantics (and in many other British compound locos) while the construction and maintenance costs were higher. The modest grate sizes of the 0-6-0s also allowed them to do menial stop-start jobs economically when not needed or (inevitably) eventually displaced from heavy fast goods work. The larger grate of the 2-6-2 might have wasted coal on easy work, and the greater size/weight might have limited route availability too.

 

Those GN style clerestory coaches lurking in the V2 picture are a source of amusement too, being cheap partial re-builds of Margate Gresley coaches, items which I was once expertlyy informed to be of no use whatsoever to serious modellers. Maybe I'm not serious enough?

 

  • Like 11
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

The "journey" dirty A4 Silver Link is a Hornby model with additional metal pipework then dirtied as per that famous pic. A bit of added weight in the boiler aids adhesion.  Train name board and lamps courtesy of "Team Grantham".

 

Baz

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a delight to open on a Monday morning, a wonderful set of photographs from a great team a super model railway generally pedant free and with a mischievous sense of humour.

This is exactly the approach which may be likely attract new entrants to the hobby rather than arguing about the colour of a tiny part on a particular engine from a specific works.

Well done chaps.

Thanks very much for that - quite made my day.

 

That I have such a wonderful team associated with the project is a constant source of amazement and gratitude, many of whom I have to thank the existence of RMWeb for as it was this website that put us in touch, either directly or indirectly. The sense of humour and 'craic' within the group is second to none and the contributions at times overwhelming. I feel very blessed.

 

Looks like the camera playing tricks on the P2 photo, the Tender and Platform Roof behind the P2 is a bit wayward too. Lovely pictures and stock .

Aha - yes, the North box operator reported a consistent 'funny sound' on the Saturday as trains passed through the Up main. After the passage of the particularly vertically challenged Raven Atlantic, it was diagnosed as a droopy canopy which was swiftly adjusted. It can be seen in its more usual attitude in the last pic on my posting, coincidentally featuring Mr King's same 'Cock'. He is very proud of them. And rightly so.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely stuff.

 

 

Those GN style clerestory coaches lurking in the V2 picture are a source of amusement too, being cheap partial re-builds of Margate Gresley coaches, items which I was once expertlyy informed to be of no use whatsoever to serious modellers. Maybe I'm not serious enough?

 

Has that re-build ever been "written-up" anywhere, please?  I have a couple tucked away in the loft and I think the novelty of something like that might well offset some deficiencies in pure scale fidelity ... from which you may deduce I may not meet some peoples' definitions of 'serious modeller' - not all the time, anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for sharing these images, the P2 is looking superb, and I bet in 'real life' it looks perfectly straight. I find modern imagery really highlights the minutest of flaws, whereas in actual fact there is no real issue what so ever. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for sharing these images, the P2 is looking superb, and I bet in 'real life' it looks perfectly straight. I find modern imagery really highlights the minutest of flaws, whereas in actual fact there is no real issue what so ever. 

I think it looks straighter in this view, Tom; though the Up canopy definitely leans. 

 

post-18225-0-92595800-1508837644_thumb.jpg

 

post-18225-0-35409200-1508837711_thumb.jpg

 

I managed to arrange this lovely line-up without too much trouble.

 

post-18225-0-71667200-1508837762_thumb.jpg

 

I think this view sums up what this 'modern classic' layout is all about (I can state that without pomposity, because I've done very little towards it). 

  • Like 18
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tony, I agree, the canopy definitely leans; however the P2 looks perfectly acceptable to me, assuming of course the track at this point is perfectly level. I suppose the only way to check would be to place it on some plate glass and check. I bet it's only 1/2 a mm out at most.

 

Grantham a modern classic - definitely! Maybe it is because it is my chosen period and the stock is superb, but yes, it is great, I'm sad to have missed it this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

       none of those namby pamby 3 cyclinder engines for expresses... proper engines with 4 cylinders ......

 

 

        Ah so - just like the GWR. has been doing for all of these years - as well as keeping the valve-gear tucked away neatly 'tween. the frames..

 

        :boast:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...