Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

On a 4mm one I built. I soldered a channel onto the front step. The three pipes then slide inside this as you attached the chassis, you had to make sure it was able to go in front first.

Hi Peter

That was the way I was thinking. It will be a few weeks yet before I need to decide.

Regards

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah! yes I remember now about the sandpipes ....I did leave them off as, with the front step being cranked inwards towards the front bogie wheel I thought the clearance would be tight, also left off the rear bogie splasher for same reason plus the possibility of shorting The guy I built it for wanted a running model so was not a problem ......

Edited by Crewe North
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The 'Schools' is away at my friends being grit blasted prior to painting. In the meantime I have been resurrecting another distressed Caley engine. This was originally a Meteor Models kit that had been assembled squarely but with little detail. It was covered in a dark blue paint of indescribable quality!

 

The Prototype is a Class 1, 4-4-0 tank engine for use on the Glasgow Central Railway which included the ' underground' lines and was fitted with condensing apparatus. It was initially painted in the full Caley lined dark blue but, when they were replaced with the electric trains, they were relegated to shunting work with the condensing apparatus removed. One of the class survived as Perth's station pilot painted in the lined sky blue livery.

 

This one will be liveried in the red and white lined black of Caley shunting tanks with the condensing pipes removed.

 

This is the model stripped of its 'Paint Job' and ready to start adding some detail and repairing some of the damage.

post-7733-0-70322400-1380183755_thumb.jpg

 

When the paint came off a large 'dent' was discovered in the side tank. It had been filled with some sort of filler which had dissolved in the cellulose thinners used in the paint removal.

 

post-7733-0-73119600-1380183765_thumb.jpg

 

Carr's 'Gap Filling' solder came in very useful here and resolved the problem without too much difficulty.

 

post-7733-0-50909000-1380183773_thumb.jpg

 

Next I had to make up a way of fitting the roof so that it was detachable for access to the cab. This is my preferred method. When I get the roof into position I use a fine permanent marker to mark the four corners by going through the cab cut outs. I then mark a line between the opposite corners.

 

post-7733-0-00513700-1380183781_thumb.jpg

 

I then cut four lengths of brass or N/S wire and bend each to 90 degrees before soldering them to the underside of the roof with the bend at the apex of the corner as already marked.

 

post-7733-0-42997800-1380183788_thumb.jpg

 

A slight outward curve, bent in the wire, will make them a nice sliding fit inside the cab and hold the roof in place.

 

post-7733-0-45764700-1380183796_thumb.jpg

 

post-7733-0-53688400-1380183804_thumb.jpg

 

This is the progress so far.

 

post-7733-0-26339700-1380183812_thumb.jpg

 

 

Sandy

Edited by Sandy Harper
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Barnaby,

 

PAD Mmmm I think it will have to be a slight of hand here. On these engines the door was usually lined as a separate panel so, along with a couple of scratched lines, It may just look the part.

 

Peter, the Schools will be lined olive green.

 

Regards

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have completed the restoration on the Caley tank but really must get back to the Schools!!!

 

I forgot to push the cab roof fully home before taking the photos!!

 

She is now for sale on both the RMweb site and the G0G 'Sales and Wants' section of the forum, if anyone is interested.

 

post-7733-0-57695500-1382517400_thumb.jpg

 

post-7733-0-22028200-1382517405_thumb.jpg

 

Sandy

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Dave

Thanks, the kit is ok (7 out of 10)with clean castings and reasonable instructions but it leaves you high and dry when it comes to the crosshead area. This took quite a bit of trial and error to get it right. The connecting rod has to be inside the coupling rod.

 

Unlike Peter I had a big issue with the chassis as I ended up, after assembly, with 30.3mm between the outside faces of the brass top hat bearings! I had to dismantle and remove nearly 2mm from the width of the frame spacers to give me a bit of side play.

 

I have a second kit to build and I have individually measured all the components across the chassis and it still comes out at 29.7mm So something to be aware of when building. The rest of the chassis went together fine.

 

Peter - the client wants the light olive green and yellow lettering, but, the second one will be a la Blubell version.

 

Jack P - I'm taking pills for the condition!

 

Kind regards

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you want side play on the drivers of a four coupled loco?

Bill

What I meant was, that I needed to get the width over the bearings to less that 29.5 to get a running clearance. I think I ended up with 29.3 over the bearing flanges which was sufficient to avoid any chance of binding between the rear of the wheel and the face of the bearing flange.

The other issue with this kit is the clearance needed between the crosshead and the rear of the front footsteps. Being white metal the steps are slightly thicker than a brass etch (I had already added a N/S strengthening strip behind the steps) and any widening of the chassis reduces this clearance.

 

Regards Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sandy, great job. I think I would have made the steps from brass to give more clearance, but I guess as you are building it to a commission, that would add time and cost into the equation. Cheers, Peter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Sandy

The schools looks great. I did one of the first 10 in EM gauge. That was interesting as there were differences in the tenders too. Still a favourite of mine even if not in keeping with my ex LSWR plans.

I knew about the LG radial. But I do believe they are blown up Jidenco kits. The Beattie well I have been doing from the same stable is. It has all the same troubles as the 4mm one.

As it is one for the future I have time to decide what to do. I need to finish the drawing for my 0395 class first as this is a long term scratch build project for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...