Jump to content
 

A Nod To Brent - a friendly thread, filled with frivolity, cream teas and pasties. Longing for the happy days in the South Hams 1947.


gwrrob
 Share

Recommended Posts

The lovely Edwardian Loco appears to have gun mounted above its right buffer.

 

 

It's there to blow the "Foriegn" locos outa the way !

 

Colonel Blimp

A mystery!  Going through all the likely books including the Russell tomes, nary an explanation or even a picture of whatever it is!  Its meant to be there for some reason as it appears to be mounted on two stands.  Somebody must know! :scratchhead:

 

Brian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

A mystery!  Going through all the likely books including the Russell tomes, nary an explanation or even a picture of whatever it is!  Its meant to be there for some reason as it appears to be mounted on two stands.  Somebody must know! :scratchhead:

 

Brian

OK OK I give in it's a locomotive jack, in olden days when engines derailed it was up to the footplate crew to put the things back on the rails. 

BTW I'm still looking for those bl00dy doors.

 

Mike Caine

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I see he's planning on doing the SR Lord Nelson if there's enough interest. £3000.

 

https://www.leemarshmodelco.com/collections/future-projects/products/sr-lord-nelson

 

 

attachicon.gifbh_single_1024x1024.png

I’m still curious to know why this locomotive carried the jack shaped gadget on its running plate - if it were essential there would be ample evidence of other examples. None of the images of Dean Singles in the Simon Lathlance collection (David Heys) showed one, a Google image search of Dean locomotives revealed only two examples : The Duchess of Teck as published by the GWRS and a 20xx class (Wikipedia).

post-21027-0-44779900-1517307523.jpeg

post-21027-0-72413900-1517307547_thumb.jpeg

Edited by Limpley Stoker
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I’m still curious to know why this locomotive carried the jack shaped gadget on its running plate - if it were essential there would be ample evidence of other examples. None of the images of Dean Singles in the Simon Lathlance collection (David Heys) showed one, a Google image search of Dean locomotives revealed only two examples : The Duchess of Teck as published by the GWRS and a 20xx class (Wikipedia).

:help:  :banghead:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Duchess of Teck as published by the GWRS and a 20xx class (Wikipedia).

 

You forgot to add the unofficial name of the second locomotive

 

post-9751-0-17183100-1517326212.jpeg

 

Carrying a wrecking ball and cutting equipment would have been more use than a jack.

 

Edited by cary hill
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I’m still curious to know why this locomotive carried the jack shaped gadget on its running plate - if it were essential there would be ample evidence of other examples. None of the images of Dean Singles in the Simon Lathlance collection (David Heys) showed one, a Google image search of Dean locomotives revealed only two examples : The Duchess of Teck as published by the GWRS and a 20xx class (Wikipedia).

 

I do wonder if it was a matter of the Driver's choice as photos of engines carrying jacks are - as you say - far from common.  I'd also wonder to what extent a single bottle jack could be used to re-ail anything let alone an engine (although it might help with a derailed bogie).  the Robinson 2-8-0s in ROD service carried a pair of jacks and photos suggest they were unique in that respect as I've seen no other pictures of Great War ROD engines with jacks which might possibly indicate they were there in case the front bogie wheels derailed - hardly substantial enough for lifting much else in the event of a derailment I would have thought.  And in any case bottle jacks without a traverse bed aren't much use for re-railing anything heavy - they needed a traverse bed even when used to lift  and re-rail c.15 tons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I would not expect anything more than a putting a bogie back on the tracks with the loco's in the photo's with a single jack but I do remember seeing a photo of a gang of men

re-railing a SR tank engine at Brighton with no more than a jack, some timbers and a couple of rerailing plates and I did witness some chaps re-rail the front bogie on a class

4 loco at Bridgenorth yard in early days of the preserved railway with some plates and a shove from another loco.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I reckon they were used more for the funny little things that happen in goods sidings, which is why they wouldn’t be on a single driver express engine. If you tilt a bottle jack slightly, you can get away without putting it on a traverser, with a few wedges and wood blocks, just for a pair of wheels not far off the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I reckon they were used more for the funny little things that happen in goods sidings, which is why they wouldn’t be on a single driver express engine. If you tilt a bottle jack slightly, you can get away without putting it on a traverser, with a few wedges and wood blocks, just for a pair of wheels not far off the line.

I've seen that happen in Southall goods yard a few times after the Loco has bounced a wagon off the tracks I'm surprised any wagon came out of that yard in one piece.   :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As to jacks, those where carried on Cambrian engines after the Welshampton accident of 1897, a practice that lasted into Great Western days. The Cambrian Railways album by C.C. Green has several photo's of Great Western lettered engines with jacks, among them a Dean Goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I reckon they were used more for the funny little things that happen in goods sidings, which is why they wouldn’t be on a single driver express engine. If you tilt a bottle jack slightly, you can get away without putting it on a traverser, with a few wedges and wood blocks, just for a pair of wheels not far off the line.

Absolutely - but don't stand too close...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely one of the most ugliest GW locomotives.  What was the 'hunchback' for anyway?

 

Brian.

That's a Dean "Kruger" named after President Kruger as an insult following the Boer War.

I think that the "hunchback" was used to keep sand dry when used for the driving wheels.

 

Personally I like the beast but then it's my sort of period and I am of GWR persuasion!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

That's a Dean "Kruger" named after President Kruger as an insult following the Boer War.

I think that the "hunchback" was used to keep sand dry when used for the driving wheels.

 

Personally I like the beast but then it's my sort of period and I am of GWR persuasion!

What kind of persuasion was used on you, to get you to like it?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

I reckon they were used more for the funny little things that happen in goods sidings, which is why they wouldn’t be on a single driver express engine. If you tilt a bottle jack slightly, you can get away without putting it on a traverser, with a few wedges and wood blocks, just for a pair of wheels not far off the line.

 

DIdn't use jacks unless something was well and truly off and needed to be traversed - and that meant getting the gang out  otherwise (if the breakdown gang weren't looking) it was set to with fishplates and bits of timber.  Although some decent steel sheet could be better than fishplates which had a habit of breaking at the wrong moment.  A past Yardmaster at Reading West Junction was known as 'spraggy' because he invariably used sprags for rerailing but they were more or less history by my time in a yard.

 

The Bristol breakdown gang - who were an absolute shower - often tried to use the trick of jacking and shoving to save getting out the traverse kit; best advice when they were about was to stand a long way away and watch out for flying shards of wood as the packing timber was wrecked.  The other large depot gangs I worked with over the years (Canton, Landore, and Old Oak) were all very professional and a pleasure to work with but the Bath Road bunch were terrible and seemed to spend most of their time shouting at each other to do the job in a different way - the breakdown supervisor wore a hearing aid and as soon as the shouting started he used to turn it off and ignore everybody (and they usually ignored him).

Edited by The Stationmaster
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

DIdn't use jacks unless something was well and truly off and needed to be traversed - and that meant getting the gang out  otherwise (if the breakdown gang weren't looking) it was set to with fishplates and bits of timber.  Although some decent steel sheet could be better than fishplates which had a habit of breaking at the wrong moment.  A past Yardmaster at Reading West Junction was known as 'spraggy' because he invariably used sprags for rerailing but they were more or less history by my time in a yard.

 

The Bristol breakdown gang - who were an absolute shower - often tried to use the trick of jacking and shoving to save getting out the traverse kit; best advice when they were about was to stand a long way away and watch out for flying shards of wood as the packing timber was wrecked.  The other large depot gangs I worked with over the years (Canton, Landore, and Old Oak) were all very professional and a pleasure to work with but the Bath Road bunch were terrible and seemed to spend most of their time shouting at each other to do the job in a different way - the breakdown supervisor wore a hearing aid and as soon as the shouting started he used to turn it off and ignore everybody (and they usually ignored him).

 

If you can get hold of a copy of 'Taking the Weight' by Bob Willis, you can read about his time on the breakdown crane at Thornaby, brilliant read, there were good and bad gangs all over the country...

 

http://titfield.co.uk/Book-shelves/Books-J6-det.htm#4170

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...